Faster bladder filling in rats reduces detrusor overactivity but worsens (i.e., decreases) bladder compliance.

Wei He, Nick Slavik, Jacob Braun, Farshad Samadifam, James A Hokanson
{"title":"Faster bladder filling in rats reduces detrusor overactivity but worsens (i.e., decreases) bladder compliance.","authors":"Wei He, Nick Slavik, Jacob Braun, Farshad Samadifam, James A Hokanson","doi":"10.1152/ajprenal.00209.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of bladder filling rate on cystometric outcomes remains unclear. Clinically, faster bladder filling is believed to increase the likelihood of observing detrusor overactivity (DO) in those with bladder dysfunction, although evidence of this is lacking. We executed this study to clarify how changes in bladder filling rate impact cystometric parameters. Urethane-anesthetized female CD rats (<i>n</i> = 19) underwent bladder filling at five different fill rates, a baseline rate scaled to have a filling phase of ∼7 min (in line with our previous work) and scaled rates of 1/3×, 2×, 4×, and 8× that speed. Contrary to expectations, filling at faster rates decreased the likelihood of observing detrusor overactivity, with 4× and 8× filling rates demonstrating less detrusor overactivity than the baseline (1×) rate (<i>P</i> = 0.0091 for 4× and <i>P</i> = 0.019 for 8×). However, faster filling rates did decrease bladder compliance. Filling at 4× and 8× demonstrated decreased bladder compliance compared to 1× (<i>P</i> = 0.032 for 4× and <i>P</i> < 0.0001 for 8×). Finally, increasing the filling rate led to increases in bladder capacity at 4× (<i>P</i> = 0.034) and 8× (<i>P</i> = 0.0066) relative to 1×. These results suggest that, contrary to expectations, faster filling may not be more effective at eliciting detrusor overactivity (i.e., not a better diagnostic approach). As reductions in detrusor overactivity and increases in bladder capacity are critical parameters for evaluating preclinical therapeutics, faster filling may impair the ability to demonstrate further improvements.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Little is known about the effects of different bladder filling rates on cystometric results. Various sources have suggested that faster filling is \"provocative\" to the bladder. However, in this study we varied bladder filling rates in anesthetized rats and observed less detrusor overactivity with faster filling, not more. We explain this discrepancy as a miscommunication about what being provocative means, where faster filling leads to worse bladder compliance (as we observed), not more detrusor overactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93867,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Renal physiology","volume":" ","pages":"F985-F993"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Renal physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00209.2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of bladder filling rate on cystometric outcomes remains unclear. Clinically, faster bladder filling is believed to increase the likelihood of observing detrusor overactivity (DO) in those with bladder dysfunction, although evidence of this is lacking. We executed this study to clarify how changes in bladder filling rate impact cystometric parameters. Urethane-anesthetized female CD rats (n = 19) underwent bladder filling at five different fill rates, a baseline rate scaled to have a filling phase of ∼7 min (in line with our previous work) and scaled rates of 1/3×, 2×, 4×, and 8× that speed. Contrary to expectations, filling at faster rates decreased the likelihood of observing detrusor overactivity, with 4× and 8× filling rates demonstrating less detrusor overactivity than the baseline (1×) rate (P = 0.0091 for 4× and P = 0.019 for 8×). However, faster filling rates did decrease bladder compliance. Filling at 4× and 8× demonstrated decreased bladder compliance compared to 1× (P = 0.032 for 4× and P < 0.0001 for 8×). Finally, increasing the filling rate led to increases in bladder capacity at 4× (P = 0.034) and 8× (P = 0.0066) relative to 1×. These results suggest that, contrary to expectations, faster filling may not be more effective at eliciting detrusor overactivity (i.e., not a better diagnostic approach). As reductions in detrusor overactivity and increases in bladder capacity are critical parameters for evaluating preclinical therapeutics, faster filling may impair the ability to demonstrate further improvements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Little is known about the effects of different bladder filling rates on cystometric results. Various sources have suggested that faster filling is "provocative" to the bladder. However, in this study we varied bladder filling rates in anesthetized rats and observed less detrusor overactivity with faster filling, not more. We explain this discrepancy as a miscommunication about what being provocative means, where faster filling leads to worse bladder compliance (as we observed), not more detrusor overactivity.

加快大鼠的膀胱充盈速度可减少逼尿肌过度活动,但却会恶化(即降低)膀胱顺应性。
膀胱充盈率对膀胱测量结果的影响仍不明确。临床上认为,膀胱充盈速度越快,膀胱功能障碍患者观察到逼尿肌过度活动(DO)的可能性就越大,但目前还缺乏这方面的证据。我们进行了这项研究,以明确膀胱充盈率的变化如何影响膀胱测量参数。尿烷麻醉的雌性 CD 大鼠(n = 19)以五种不同的充盈速度进行膀胱充盈,基线充盈速度按比例计算,充盈阶段约为七分钟(与我们之前的研究一致),按比例计算的充盈速度分别为 1/3x、2x、4x 和 8x。与预期相反,较快的充盈速度降低了观察到逼尿肌过度活动的可能性,4 倍和 8 倍的充盈速度比基线(1 倍)速度显示出较少的逼尿肌过度活动(4 倍的 P = 0.0091,8 倍的 P = 0.019)。不过,较快的充盈率确实会降低膀胱顺应性。与 1x 相比,4x 和 8x 的充盈率会降低膀胱顺应性(4x 的 P = 0.032,8x 的 P <0.0001)。最后,与 1x 相比,4x(P = 0.034)和 8x(P = 0.0066)充盈率的增加会导致膀胱容量的增加。这些结果表明,与预期相反,更快的充盈速度可能不会更有效地引起逼尿肌过度活动(即不是更好的诊断方法)。由于减少逼尿肌过度活动和增加膀胱容量是评估临床前疗法的关键参数,更快的充盈速度可能会影响进一步改善的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信