AI-generated vs. student-crafted assignments and implications for evaluating student work in nursing: an exploratory reflection.

IF 1.3 Q3 NURSING
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/ijnes-2023-0098
Kateryna Metersky, Kaveenaa Chandrasekaran, Rezwana Rahman, Murtaza Haider, Areej Al-Hamad
{"title":"AI-generated vs. student-crafted assignments and implications for evaluating student work in nursing: an exploratory reflection.","authors":"Kateryna Metersky, Kaveenaa Chandrasekaran, Rezwana Rahman, Murtaza Haider, Areej Al-Hamad","doi":"10.1515/ijnes-2023-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an artificial intelligence-powered language model that can generate a unique outputs, in reponse to a user's textual request. This has raised concerns related to academic integrity in nursing education as students may use the platform to generate original assignment content. Subsequently, the objective of this quality improvement project were to explore and identify effective strategies that educators can use to discern AI-generated papers from student-written submissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four nursing students were requested to submit two versions a Letter to the Editor assignement; one assignment that was written by the student; the other, exclusively generated by ChatGPT-3.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-generated assignments were typically grammatically well-written, but some of the scholarly references used were outdated, incorrectly cited, or at times completely fabricated,. Additionally, the AI-generated assignments lacked detail and depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nursing educators should possess an understanding of the capabilities of ChatGPT-like technologies to further enhance nursing students' knowledge development and to ensure academic integrity is upheld.</p>","PeriodicalId":35294,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2023-0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an artificial intelligence-powered language model that can generate a unique outputs, in reponse to a user's textual request. This has raised concerns related to academic integrity in nursing education as students may use the platform to generate original assignment content. Subsequently, the objective of this quality improvement project were to explore and identify effective strategies that educators can use to discern AI-generated papers from student-written submissions.

Methods: Four nursing students were requested to submit two versions a Letter to the Editor assignement; one assignment that was written by the student; the other, exclusively generated by ChatGPT-3.5.

Results: AI-generated assignments were typically grammatically well-written, but some of the scholarly references used were outdated, incorrectly cited, or at times completely fabricated,. Additionally, the AI-generated assignments lacked detail and depth.

Conclusions: Nursing educators should possess an understanding of the capabilities of ChatGPT-like technologies to further enhance nursing students' knowledge development and to ensure academic integrity is upheld.

人工智能生成作业与学生自制作业的对比,以及对护理专业学生作业评价的影响:探索性思考。
目标聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)是一种人工智能驱动的语言模型,可根据用户的文本请求生成独特的输出。这引起了人们对护理教育中学术诚信的关注,因为学生可能会利用该平台生成原创的作业内容。因此,本质量改进项目的目标是探索和确定有效的策略,以便教育者从学生提交的论文中分辨出人工智能生成的论文:方法:要求四名护理专业学生提交两个版本的 "致编辑的信 "作业;其中一个作业由学生自己撰写,另一个则完全由 ChatGPT-3.5 生成:人工智能生成的作业通常语法通顺,但使用的一些学术参考文献过时、引用错误,有时甚至完全是编造的。此外,人工智能生成的作业缺乏细节和深度:护理教育者应了解类似 ChatGPT 技术的功能,以进一步加强护理学生的知识发展,并确保学术诚信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship publishes significant research and scholarship in the broad field of nursing education. The mandate of the journal is to present high quality papers to advance nursing education through research, description of innovative methods, or introduction of novel approaches about all aspects of nursing education in a timely manner. The specific aims of IJNES are to: - Promote worldwide scholarship in nursing education - Enhance and advance nursing education globally - Provide a forum for the dissemination of international perspectives and scholarship in nursing education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信