Association of novel dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores with incidence and progression of coronary artery calcification in middle-late adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study.
{"title":"Association of novel dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores with incidence and progression of coronary artery calcification in middle-late adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Azra Ramezankhani, Parto Hadaegh, Farzad Hadaegh","doi":"10.1186/s12937-024-01028-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary patterns and lifestyle factors can influence the intensity of systemic inflammation and, consequently, the development and progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC). This study aimed to explore the relationship between the inflammatory potentials of diet and lifestyle, as captured by novel dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores (DIS and LIS), with CAC incidence and progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data on 5949 Black and White men and women ≥ 45 years old participating in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort. Baseline data on diet and lifestyle factors were collected from 2000 to 2002 and used to construct the DIS and LIS, which reflect the overall inflammatory potential of diet and lifestyle. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for CAC incidence and progression across quartiles of DIS and LIS, adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years, among 2638 participants with zero CAC score at baseline, 977 individuals developed positive scores, and 1681 out of 2561 participants showed CAC progression. For individuals in the highest (more pro-inflammatory) compared to the lowest (more anti-inflammatory) quartiles of the LIS, the multivariable-adjusted HR for CAC incidence was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.10-1.65; P trend < 0.002). This association was stronger among younger adults aged < 60 years compared to those aged ≥ 60 years, with respective values of 1.76 (1.34-2.30) and 1.02 (0.78-1.35) (P interaction < 0.001). However, the LIS was not significantly associated with the progression of existing CAC. Among the components of the LIS, a body mas index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and current smoking were significant predictors for the incidence and progression of CAC, respectively. No significant association was found between DIS and CAC incidence and progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lifestyle factors, through their impact on systemic inflammation, may be associated with a higher risk of CAC incidence in middle and late adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-01028-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dietary patterns and lifestyle factors can influence the intensity of systemic inflammation and, consequently, the development and progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC). This study aimed to explore the relationship between the inflammatory potentials of diet and lifestyle, as captured by novel dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores (DIS and LIS), with CAC incidence and progression.
Methods: We analyzed data on 5949 Black and White men and women ≥ 45 years old participating in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort. Baseline data on diet and lifestyle factors were collected from 2000 to 2002 and used to construct the DIS and LIS, which reflect the overall inflammatory potential of diet and lifestyle. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for CAC incidence and progression across quartiles of DIS and LIS, adjusting for potential confounders.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years, among 2638 participants with zero CAC score at baseline, 977 individuals developed positive scores, and 1681 out of 2561 participants showed CAC progression. For individuals in the highest (more pro-inflammatory) compared to the lowest (more anti-inflammatory) quartiles of the LIS, the multivariable-adjusted HR for CAC incidence was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.10-1.65; P trend < 0.002). This association was stronger among younger adults aged < 60 years compared to those aged ≥ 60 years, with respective values of 1.76 (1.34-2.30) and 1.02 (0.78-1.35) (P interaction < 0.001). However, the LIS was not significantly associated with the progression of existing CAC. Among the components of the LIS, a body mas index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and current smoking were significant predictors for the incidence and progression of CAC, respectively. No significant association was found between DIS and CAC incidence and progression.
Conclusions: Lifestyle factors, through their impact on systemic inflammation, may be associated with a higher risk of CAC incidence in middle and late adulthood.
期刊介绍：
Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered.
Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies.
In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
