Theta oscillations in observers’ temporal cortex index postural instability of point-light displays

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Banty Tia , Mitsuaki Takemi , Thierry Pozzo
{"title":"Theta oscillations in observers’ temporal cortex index postural instability of point-light displays","authors":"Banty Tia ,&nbsp;Mitsuaki Takemi ,&nbsp;Thierry Pozzo","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether postural equilibration follows the same principles of motor resonance as goal-oriented actions, namely, whether an individual activates the same neuronal substrates when experiencing postural perturbation as when observing another individual in this condition. To address this question, we examined electroencephalographic dynamics while subjects observed point-light displays featuring an unstable human display, a stable human display, and their respective scrambled counterparts lacking shape information and biological motion. We focused on theta band (4–7 Hz), which is a fundamental frequency for modulating brain activity during challenging balance tasks and reflects postural stability monitoring. Rather than mirroring activity, our findings suggest an inhibitory response to postural instability. Theta event-related synchronization in the left temporal cortex was dampened for the unstable display as compared to its scramble counterpart and to the stable display. This low theta response coincided with an increase in left temporal-prefrontal connectivity, compatible with top-down inhibitory mechanisms. By contrast, the stronger theta response to the stable display as compared to the unstable one could be due to the difficulty of recognizing low-motion biological stimuli, or alternatively, to a facilitation of stimulus processing and strengthening of the mirroring response. The response facilitation for stable posture, coupled with a diminished response to the unstable display, could contribute to a broader mechanism mitigating postural threats and ensuring stable balance. Future investigations should leverage these findings to explore how posture-related responses correlate with perceptual and motor expertise, and to more clearly define these mechanisms during dynamic social interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"561 ","pages":"Pages 107-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452224005396","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates whether postural equilibration follows the same principles of motor resonance as goal-oriented actions, namely, whether an individual activates the same neuronal substrates when experiencing postural perturbation as when observing another individual in this condition. To address this question, we examined electroencephalographic dynamics while subjects observed point-light displays featuring an unstable human display, a stable human display, and their respective scrambled counterparts lacking shape information and biological motion. We focused on theta band (4–7 Hz), which is a fundamental frequency for modulating brain activity during challenging balance tasks and reflects postural stability monitoring. Rather than mirroring activity, our findings suggest an inhibitory response to postural instability. Theta event-related synchronization in the left temporal cortex was dampened for the unstable display as compared to its scramble counterpart and to the stable display. This low theta response coincided with an increase in left temporal-prefrontal connectivity, compatible with top-down inhibitory mechanisms. By contrast, the stronger theta response to the stable display as compared to the unstable one could be due to the difficulty of recognizing low-motion biological stimuli, or alternatively, to a facilitation of stimulus processing and strengthening of the mirroring response. The response facilitation for stable posture, coupled with a diminished response to the unstable display, could contribute to a broader mechanism mitigating postural threats and ensuring stable balance. Future investigations should leverage these findings to explore how posture-related responses correlate with perceptual and motor expertise, and to more clearly define these mechanisms during dynamic social interactions.
观察者颞叶皮层中的θ振荡反映了点光源显示的姿势不稳定性。
本研究探讨了姿势平衡是否遵循与目标导向动作相同的运动共振原理,即个体在经历姿势扰动时激活的神经元基底是否与在此条件下观察他人时激活的神经元基底相同。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了受试者在观察点光源显示时的脑电动态,点光源显示包括不稳定的人体显示、稳定的人体显示以及各自缺乏形状信息和生物运动的乱码显示。我们重点研究了θ波段(4-7赫兹),它是在高难度平衡任务中调节大脑活动的基本频率,反映了姿势稳定性监测。我们的研究结果表明,姿势不稳定性是一种抑制性反应,而不是镜像活动。与不稳定显示和稳定显示相比,左颞叶皮层的 Theta 事件相关同步受到抑制。这种低θ反应与左侧颞叶-前额叶连接的增加相吻合,与自上而下的抑制机制相符。相比之下,与不稳定显示相比,稳定显示的θ反应更强,这可能是由于识别低运动生物刺激的困难,或者是由于刺激处理的促进和镜像反应的加强。对稳定姿势的反应促进,再加上对不稳定显示的反应减弱,可能有助于建立一个更广泛的机制,以减轻姿势威胁并确保稳定平衡。未来的研究应该利用这些发现来探索姿势相关反应如何与知觉和运动专长相关联,并在动态社会互动中更清晰地定义这些机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信