Associations of parenting styles with substance use in the offspring-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE

Drug and alcohol review Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1111/dar.13961

Martin Pinquart, Jana Lauk

{"title":"Associations of parenting styles with substance use in the offspring-A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Martin Pinquart, Jana Lauk","doi":"10.1111/dar.13961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issues: Parenting styles have been suggested to predict the use of psychoactive substances in the offspring, although the size of associations might vary between cultures. The present meta-analysis tested whether parenting styles show concurrent and longitudinal associations with substance use and whether this association is moderated by study characteristics.Approach: A systematic search in electronic data bases resulted in 184 studies that were included in multi-level meta-analysis.Key findings: An authoritative parenting style correlated with lower substance use (r =-0.12, confidence interval [CI] -0.14 to -0.10) while the reverse was found for neglectful (r = 0.10, CI 0.08 to 0.13), permissive (r = 0.04, CI 0.01 to 0.07) and authoritarian parenting (r = 0.03, CI 0.00 to 0.05). Analysis of cross-lagged effects found only an effect of authoritative parenting on decline of substance use (r = -0.06, CI -0.12 to -0.00). The size of associations varied, in part, by levels of horizontal and vertical collectivism or individualism, assessment of three versus four parenting styles, type of substance, and use of same versus different informants for assessing parenting and substance use.Implications: Parenting styles show small to very small associations with substance use.Conclusions: Although parents are recommended to behave in an authoritative manner, we should have only modest expectations about the effects of parenting styles on substance use in the offspring.","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issues: Parenting styles have been suggested to predict the use of psychoactive substances in the offspring, although the size of associations might vary between cultures. The present meta-analysis tested whether parenting styles show concurrent and longitudinal associations with substance use and whether this association is moderated by study characteristics.

Approach: A systematic search in electronic data bases resulted in 184 studies that were included in multi-level meta-analysis.

Key findings: An authoritative parenting style correlated with lower substance use (r =-0.12, confidence interval [CI] -0.14 to -0.10) while the reverse was found for neglectful (r = 0.10, CI 0.08 to 0.13), permissive (r = 0.04, CI 0.01 to 0.07) and authoritarian parenting (r = 0.03, CI 0.00 to 0.05). Analysis of cross-lagged effects found only an effect of authoritative parenting on decline of substance use (r = -0.06, CI -0.12 to -0.00). The size of associations varied, in part, by levels of horizontal and vertical collectivism or individualism, assessment of three versus four parenting styles, type of substance, and use of same versus different informants for assessing parenting and substance use.

Implications: Parenting styles show small to very small associations with substance use.

Conclusions: Although parents are recommended to behave in an authoritative manner, we should have only modest expectations about the effects of parenting styles on substance use in the offspring.

查看原文本刊更多论文

养育方式与后代使用药物的关系--系统回顾和荟萃分析。

问题：有人认为，养育方式可预测后代使用精神活性物质的情况，尽管不同文化之间的关联程度可能有所不同。本荟萃分析检验了养育方式是否与药物使用存在并发和纵向关联，以及这种关联是否受研究特征的调节：方法：在电子数据库中进行了系统搜索，结果有 184 项研究被纳入多层次荟萃分析：权威型养育方式与较低的药物使用率相关（r =-0.12，置信区间 [CI] -0.14至-0.10），而忽视型（r = 0.10，CI 0.08至0.13）、放任型（r = 0.04，CI 0.01至0.07）和专制型（r = 0.03，CI 0.00至0.05）则相反。对交叉滞后效应的分析发现，只有权威型养育方式对药物使用下降有影响（r = -0.06，CI -0.12至-0.00）。相关性的大小部分取决于横向和纵向集体主义或个人主义的水平、三种或四种养育方式的评估、物质类型以及使用相同或不同的信息提供者来评估养育方式和物质使用情况：影响：养育方式与药物使用的关系很小：结论：尽管建议父母以权威的方式行事，但我们对养育方式对后代药物使用的影响只能抱有适度的期望。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

10.50%

发文量

151

期刊介绍： Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.