Analyzing Wooclap’s Competition Mode With AI Through Classroom Recordings

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Óscar Cánovas Reverte;Pilar González Férez;Félix J. García Clemente;Federico Pardo García
{"title":"Analyzing Wooclap’s Competition Mode With AI Through Classroom Recordings","authors":"Óscar Cánovas Reverte;Pilar González Férez;Félix J. García Clemente;Federico Pardo García","doi":"10.1109/RITA.2024.3458865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents findings derived from the implementation of different modes of using an interactive response system in a Computer Engineering Degree course. The research focuses on the use of the Wooclap platform, which allows posing questions to students for real-time responses using their mobile devices. The designed experience addresses two modalities of platform use: one without competition and another with competition based on points. The methodology involves two distinct groups of students responding to the same questions, led by the same teacher in separate tests, using different platform modes. This quasi-experimental approach is based on data collection regarding student performance (correct responses to questions) and the overall level of classroom interaction during the tests. Furthermore, an audio recording analysis system supported by artificial intelligence is utilized to characterize the participation of the various actors involved.To further the analysis, transcriptions of the teacher’s oral interventions are examined, investigating the typology of these interventions and evaluating if the quantity and distribution of these types vary between the competition mode and the non-competition mode. The results reveal distinctive patterns in the level of student interaction during the tests, depending on the mode used, as well as in the type of interventions made by the teacher. Despite these variations, the results indicate that the mode of use does not have a significant influence on the performance achieved by the students.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10677522/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents findings derived from the implementation of different modes of using an interactive response system in a Computer Engineering Degree course. The research focuses on the use of the Wooclap platform, which allows posing questions to students for real-time responses using their mobile devices. The designed experience addresses two modalities of platform use: one without competition and another with competition based on points. The methodology involves two distinct groups of students responding to the same questions, led by the same teacher in separate tests, using different platform modes. This quasi-experimental approach is based on data collection regarding student performance (correct responses to questions) and the overall level of classroom interaction during the tests. Furthermore, an audio recording analysis system supported by artificial intelligence is utilized to characterize the participation of the various actors involved.To further the analysis, transcriptions of the teacher’s oral interventions are examined, investigating the typology of these interventions and evaluating if the quantity and distribution of these types vary between the competition mode and the non-competition mode. The results reveal distinctive patterns in the level of student interaction during the tests, depending on the mode used, as well as in the type of interventions made by the teacher. Despite these variations, the results indicate that the mode of use does not have a significant influence on the performance achieved by the students.
通过课堂录音分析 Wooclap 的人工智能竞争模式
本文介绍了在计算机工程学位课程中采用不同模式使用交互式应答系统的研究结果。研究的重点是 Wooclap 平台的使用,该平台允许使用学生的移动设备向他们提出问题,让他们进行实时回答。设计的体验涉及两种平台使用模式:一种是无竞争模式,另一种是基于积分的竞争模式。该方法涉及两组不同的学生,在同一教师的引导下,使用不同的平台模式,在不同的测试中回答相同的问题。这种准实验方法基于对学生成绩(对问题的正确回答)和测试期间课堂互动整体水平的数据收集。此外,还利用人工智能支持的录音分析系统来描述各参与方的参与情况。为了进一步进行分析,研究人员对教师的口头干预进行了转录,调查了这些干预的类型,并评估了这些类型的数量和分布在竞争模式和非竞争模式之间是否存在差异。结果表明,学生在测试期间的互动程度(取决于所使用的模式)以及教师的干预类型都有不同的模式。尽管存在这些差异,但结果表明,使用的模式对学生取得的成绩没有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信