Probabilistic risk assessment of civil aircraft associated failures under condition-based maintenance

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Yuanyuan Guo , Youchao Sun , Qingmin Si , Xinyao Guo , Nongtian Chen
{"title":"Probabilistic risk assessment of civil aircraft associated failures under condition-based maintenance","authors":"Yuanyuan Guo ,&nbsp;Youchao Sun ,&nbsp;Qingmin Si ,&nbsp;Xinyao Guo ,&nbsp;Nongtian Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2024.110550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maintenance can improve an aircraft system's reliability over a long operation period or when a component has failed. However, inappropriate maintenance inspection intervals will cause latent failures to be covered or undetected, leading to a large number of unplanned flight disruptions for airlines. In this paper, we present a two-stage framework to assess the associated failure risk of civil aircraft under condition-based maintenance. In the first stage of the framework, the probability of primary functional failure across the lifecycles of the monitored component is determined by analyzing whether the current inspection interval prevents the component from progressing from latent failure to functional failure. In the second stage of the framework, the associated failure probability between components and related systems is formulated by the adjacency matrix. The structure and performance of the proposed model were tested on a case study by run-to-failure data associated with aircraft engines from a large airline. Focusing on the scenario of turbine disk cracking leading to fragment penetration of the fuel tank and causing fire as the consequential fault impact path, the results show that the risk of aircraft fire caused by turbine disk fragments falls within an acceptable range, necessitating the completion of inspections and subsequent monitoring within the stipulated timeframe. The method can be used to readjust the inspection interval, optimize the operation plan, improve the on-time performance of flights, and reduce the risk of aviation accidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 110550"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024006227","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maintenance can improve an aircraft system's reliability over a long operation period or when a component has failed. However, inappropriate maintenance inspection intervals will cause latent failures to be covered or undetected, leading to a large number of unplanned flight disruptions for airlines. In this paper, we present a two-stage framework to assess the associated failure risk of civil aircraft under condition-based maintenance. In the first stage of the framework, the probability of primary functional failure across the lifecycles of the monitored component is determined by analyzing whether the current inspection interval prevents the component from progressing from latent failure to functional failure. In the second stage of the framework, the associated failure probability between components and related systems is formulated by the adjacency matrix. The structure and performance of the proposed model were tested on a case study by run-to-failure data associated with aircraft engines from a large airline. Focusing on the scenario of turbine disk cracking leading to fragment penetration of the fuel tank and causing fire as the consequential fault impact path, the results show that the risk of aircraft fire caused by turbine disk fragments falls within an acceptable range, necessitating the completion of inspections and subsequent monitoring within the stipulated timeframe. The method can be used to readjust the inspection interval, optimize the operation plan, improve the on-time performance of flights, and reduce the risk of aviation accidents.
基于状态的维护下民用飞机相关故障的概率风险评估
维护可以提高飞机系统在长时间运行或某个部件出现故障时的可靠性。然而,不恰当的维护检查间隔会导致潜在故障被掩盖或未被发现,从而给航空公司带来大量计划外的飞行中断。在本文中,我们提出了一个分两个阶段评估基于状态的维护下民用飞机相关故障风险的框架。在该框架的第一阶段,通过分析当前检查间隔是否能防止部件从潜伏故障发展为功能故障,来确定受监控部件在整个生命周期内发生主要功能故障的概率。在该框架的第二阶段,通过邻接矩阵确定组件和相关系统之间的相关故障概率。通过对一家大型航空公司的飞机发动机运行到故障的相关数据进行案例研究,对所提出模型的结构和性能进行了测试。结果表明,涡轮盘碎片导致飞机起火的风险在可接受范围内,因此有必要在规定时间内完成检查和后续监控。该方法可用于重新调整检查间隔,优化运行计划,提高航班准点率,降低航空事故风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信