{"title":"A comprehensive framework for estimating the remaining useful life of Li-ion batteries under limited data conditions with no temporal identifier","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2024.110517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The escalating applications of Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries in renewable energy and electric vehicles underscore the need for enhanced prognostics and health management systems to reduce the risk of sudden failures. Remaining useful life (RUL) determination is one of the most critical tasks in the field of battery prognostics nowadays. Even though statistical and machine learning (ML) methods have proven effective in research setups, many challenges prevent applying these prediction methods to real-life scenarios. These challenges include (1) scarcity of run-to-failure datasets with similar experimental conditions, (2) low data granularity when presented in capacity vs. discharge cycle pairs, and (3) lack of “temporal identifiers” in real-life scenarios. A temporal identifier is any label that provides knowledge about the current degradation state of a working battery. The research question developed for this study was, ‘Can the remaining useful life of a Li-ion battery having limited data without a temporal identifier be predicted?’ The specific aims were to estimate the temporal identifier of limited data and to predict the remaining useful life (RUL). An innovative framework incorporating reliability analysis and deep learning addresses these specific aims. Experimental data is used to test the framework's capabilities, limiting the training dataset to only three batteries and the testing dataset to a small sample (< 10 data points) of another battery. This new approach enabled the RUL prediction to achieve errors as low as ∼5 cycles and root mean square error of 6.24 cycles, outperforming other benchmark studies on Li-ion battery RUL prediction that use more battery degradation data without temporal identifier.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024005891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The escalating applications of Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries in renewable energy and electric vehicles underscore the need for enhanced prognostics and health management systems to reduce the risk of sudden failures. Remaining useful life (RUL) determination is one of the most critical tasks in the field of battery prognostics nowadays. Even though statistical and machine learning (ML) methods have proven effective in research setups, many challenges prevent applying these prediction methods to real-life scenarios. These challenges include (1) scarcity of run-to-failure datasets with similar experimental conditions, (2) low data granularity when presented in capacity vs. discharge cycle pairs, and (3) lack of “temporal identifiers” in real-life scenarios. A temporal identifier is any label that provides knowledge about the current degradation state of a working battery. The research question developed for this study was, ‘Can the remaining useful life of a Li-ion battery having limited data without a temporal identifier be predicted?’ The specific aims were to estimate the temporal identifier of limited data and to predict the remaining useful life (RUL). An innovative framework incorporating reliability analysis and deep learning addresses these specific aims. Experimental data is used to test the framework's capabilities, limiting the training dataset to only three batteries and the testing dataset to a small sample (< 10 data points) of another battery. This new approach enabled the RUL prediction to achieve errors as low as ∼5 cycles and root mean square error of 6.24 cycles, outperforming other benchmark studies on Li-ion battery RUL prediction that use more battery degradation data without temporal identifier.
期刊介绍:
Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.