Impact of the Quality of Life Supports Model on the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: A scoping review

IF 2.9 2区医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Research in Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104850

Óscar Gonzalo , Inés Heras , José Luis Castillo , Cuauhtémoc Meza , Miguel Ángel Verdugo

{"title":"Impact of the Quality of Life Supports Model on the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: A scoping review","authors":"Óscar Gonzalo , Inés Heras , José Luis Castillo , Cuauhtémoc Meza , Miguel Ángel Verdugo","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Quality of Life Supports Model (QOLSM) is a well-suited framework for enhancing the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. No research aimed at assessing its impact has been identified.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This review aims to map the scientific literature to assess the current impact of QOLSM on higher education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><div>A Scoping Review of educational practices, policies, and cultures aimed at enhancing the quality of life for students with disabilities was conducted. Databases from EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and Scielo were employed to identify studies written in English or Spanish from 1978 to 2023. Four independent reviewers screened results for inclusion.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><div>Out of 5361 records, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Students with developmental disabilities are the primary recipients of Quality-of-life support strategies. The reported educational practices were poorly aligned with the disability rights framework, the social-ecological model of disability, and the multidimensional Quality-of-Life construct. Specialized supports and mainstream settings were more common than generic supports and segregated settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><div>This review highlights the currently limited impact of the QOLSM in fostering the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. Conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis is not recommended at this stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Quality of Life Supports Model (QOLSM) is a well-suited framework for enhancing the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. No research aimed at assessing its impact has been identified.

Aims

This review aims to map the scientific literature to assess the current impact of QOLSM on higher education.

Methods and procedures

A Scoping Review of educational practices, policies, and cultures aimed at enhancing the quality of life for students with disabilities was conducted. Databases from EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and Scielo were employed to identify studies written in English or Spanish from 1978 to 2023. Four independent reviewers screened results for inclusion.

Outcomes and results

Out of 5361 records, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Students with developmental disabilities are the primary recipients of Quality-of-life support strategies. The reported educational practices were poorly aligned with the disability rights framework, the social-ecological model of disability, and the multidimensional Quality-of-Life construct. Specialized supports and mainstream settings were more common than generic supports and segregated settings.

Conclusions and implications

This review highlights the currently limited impact of the QOLSM in fostering the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. Conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis is not recommended at this stage.

查看原文本刊更多论文

生活质量支持模式对残疾学生融入高等教育的影响：范围综述。

背景：生活质量支持模式（QOLSM）是一个非常适合加强残疾学生融入高等教育的框架。目的：本综述旨在对科学文献进行梳理，以评估 QOLSM 目前对高等教育的影响：对旨在提高残疾学生生活质量的教育实践、政策和文化进行了范围界定。我们使用了 EBSCOHost、ProQuest 和 Scielo 数据库，以确定 1978 年至 2023 年期间用英语或西班牙语撰写的研究。四位独立审稿人对结果进行了筛选，以纳入研究：在 5361 条记录中，有 21 条符合纳入标准。发育障碍学生是生活质量支持策略的主要接受者。所报告的教育实践与残疾人权利框架、残疾的社会生态模式以及多维生活质量构建不甚一致。特殊支持和主流环境比一般支持和隔离环境更为常见：本综述强调了 "QOLSM "目前在促进残疾学生融入高等教育方面的有限影响。现阶段不建议进行系统回顾或荟萃分析。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Research in Developmental Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

6.50%

发文量

178

期刊介绍： Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.