Pieter Sanczuk, Kris Verheyen, Jonathan Lenoir, Florian Zellweger, Jonas J. Lembrechts, Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez, Lander Baeten, Markus Bernhardt-Römermann, Karen De Pauw, Pieter Vangansbeke, Michael P. Perring, Imre Berki, Anne D. Bjorkman, Jörg Brunet, Markéta Chudomelová, Emiel De Lombaerde, Guillaume Decocq, Thomas Dirnböck, Tomasz Durak, Caroline Greiser, Radim Hédl, Thilo Heinken, Ute Jandt, Bogdan Jaroszewicz, Martin Kopecký, Dries Landuyt, Martin Macek, František Máliš, Tobias Naaf, Thomas A. Nagel, Petr Petřík, Kamila Reczyńska, Wolfgang Schmidt, Tibor Standovár, Ingmar R. Staude, Krzysztof Świerkosz, Balázs Teleki, Thomas Vanneste, Ondrej Vild, Donald Waller, Pieter De Frenne
{"title":"Unexpected westward range shifts in European forest plants link to nitrogen deposition","authors":"Pieter Sanczuk, Kris Verheyen, Jonathan Lenoir, Florian Zellweger, Jonas J. Lembrechts, Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez, Lander Baeten, Markus Bernhardt-Römermann, Karen De Pauw, Pieter Vangansbeke, Michael P. Perring, Imre Berki, Anne D. Bjorkman, Jörg Brunet, Markéta Chudomelová, Emiel De Lombaerde, Guillaume Decocq, Thomas Dirnböck, Tomasz Durak, Caroline Greiser, Radim Hédl, Thilo Heinken, Ute Jandt, Bogdan Jaroszewicz, Martin Kopecký, Dries Landuyt, Martin Macek, František Máliš, Tobias Naaf, Thomas A. Nagel, Petr Petřík, Kamila Reczyńska, Wolfgang Schmidt, Tibor Standovár, Ingmar R. Staude, Krzysztof Świerkosz, Balázs Teleki, Thomas Vanneste, Ondrej Vild, Donald Waller, Pieter De Frenne","doi":"10.1126/science.ado0878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >Climate change is commonly assumed to induce species’ range shifts toward the poles. Yet, other environmental changes may affect the geographical distribution of species in unexpected ways. Here, we quantify multidecadal shifts in the distribution of European forest plants and link these shifts to key drivers of forest biodiversity change: climate change, atmospheric deposition (nitrogen and sulfur), and forest canopy dynamics. Surprisingly, westward distribution shifts were 2.6 times more likely than northward ones. Not climate change, but nitrogen-mediated colonization events, possibly facilitated by the recovery from past acidifying deposition, best explain westward movements. Biodiversity redistribution patterns appear complex and are more likely driven by the interplay among several environmental changes than due to the exclusive effects of climate change alone.</div>","PeriodicalId":21678,"journal":{"name":"Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":44.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado0878","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate change is commonly assumed to induce species’ range shifts toward the poles. Yet, other environmental changes may affect the geographical distribution of species in unexpected ways. Here, we quantify multidecadal shifts in the distribution of European forest plants and link these shifts to key drivers of forest biodiversity change: climate change, atmospheric deposition (nitrogen and sulfur), and forest canopy dynamics. Surprisingly, westward distribution shifts were 2.6 times more likely than northward ones. Not climate change, but nitrogen-mediated colonization events, possibly facilitated by the recovery from past acidifying deposition, best explain westward movements. Biodiversity redistribution patterns appear complex and are more likely driven by the interplay among several environmental changes than due to the exclusive effects of climate change alone.
期刊介绍:
Science is a leading outlet for scientific news, commentary, and cutting-edge research. Through its print and online incarnations, Science reaches an estimated worldwide readership of more than one million. Science’s authorship is global too, and its articles consistently rank among the world's most cited research.
Science serves as a forum for discussion of important issues related to the advancement of science by publishing material on which a consensus has been reached as well as including the presentation of minority or conflicting points of view. Accordingly, all articles published in Science—including editorials, news and comment, and book reviews—are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.
Science seeks to publish those papers that are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected papers should present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and general public provided by publication in Science, beyond that provided by specialty journals. Science welcomes submissions from all fields of science and from any source. The editors are committed to the prompt evaluation and publication of submitted papers while upholding high standards that support reproducibility of published research. Science is published weekly; selected papers are published online ahead of print.