A closer look at the demographics of same-sex marriage in the United States: Implications for research, practice, and policy.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1111/famp.13065
Nicholas S Perry, Jenny Lee, Galena K Rhoades
{"title":"A closer look at the demographics of same-sex marriage in the United States: Implications for research, practice, and policy.","authors":"Nicholas S Perry, Jenny Lee, Galena K Rhoades","doi":"10.1111/famp.13065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2015, the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, setting in motion a sweeping social change for sexual minority people and their romantic relationships. The United States Census Bureau collects demographic data on same-sex couple households, offering an opportunity to better understand the demographic makeup of same-sex marriage today. This knowledge is essential for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers who aim to understand and support same-sex couples' relationships. We used national probability data from the American Community Survey collected in 2021 (the most recent year these data are available) on married and unmarried, cohabiting same-sex and opposite-sex households. Respondents reported their own age, race, ethnicity, education, employment, income, home ownership, and whether they had children living with them in their household. Differences between married and unmarried opposite-sex couples were observed in race, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic status, consistent with prior research. Many of these demographic gaps also existed for same-sex couples, although these were often smaller. Several of these differences further varied between male and female same-sex couples. Same-sex married couples appear to be more demographically diverse than opposite-sex married couples. However, like opposite-sex couples, same-sex couples from multiple minoritized groups were less likely to be married. Future research is needed to understand drivers of these differences (e.g., different attitudes about marriage or lack of access to marriage) and their impact. Policymakers and clinicians will need to bear these group differences in mind when designing policy and delivering services to support the well-being of sexual minority couples.</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2015, the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, setting in motion a sweeping social change for sexual minority people and their romantic relationships. The United States Census Bureau collects demographic data on same-sex couple households, offering an opportunity to better understand the demographic makeup of same-sex marriage today. This knowledge is essential for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers who aim to understand and support same-sex couples' relationships. We used national probability data from the American Community Survey collected in 2021 (the most recent year these data are available) on married and unmarried, cohabiting same-sex and opposite-sex households. Respondents reported their own age, race, ethnicity, education, employment, income, home ownership, and whether they had children living with them in their household. Differences between married and unmarried opposite-sex couples were observed in race, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic status, consistent with prior research. Many of these demographic gaps also existed for same-sex couples, although these were often smaller. Several of these differences further varied between male and female same-sex couples. Same-sex married couples appear to be more demographically diverse than opposite-sex married couples. However, like opposite-sex couples, same-sex couples from multiple minoritized groups were less likely to be married. Future research is needed to understand drivers of these differences (e.g., different attitudes about marriage or lack of access to marriage) and their impact. Policymakers and clinicians will need to bear these group differences in mind when designing policy and delivering services to support the well-being of sexual minority couples.

仔细研究美国同性婚姻的人口统计数据:对研究、实践和政策的影响。
2015 年,美国最高法院在全国范围内将同性婚姻合法化,为性少数群体及其恋爱关系掀起了一场翻天覆地的社会变革。美国人口普查局收集了同性伴侣家庭的人口数据,为更好地了解当今同性婚姻的人口构成提供了机会。这些知识对于旨在了解和支持同性伴侣关系的研究人员、从业人员和政策制定者来说至关重要。我们使用了 2021 年(可获得这些数据的最近一年)从美国社区调查中收集的已婚和未婚、同性和异性同居家庭的全国概率数据。受访者报告了自己的年龄、种族、民族、教育程度、就业、收入、房屋所有权,以及是否有子女与其同住。已婚和未婚异性夫妇在种族、民族、年龄和社会经济地位方面存在差异,这与之前的研究结果一致。同性伴侣之间也存在许多这样的人口统计学差异,尽管这些差异通常较小。男性和女性同性伴侣之间的差异还进一步扩大。与异性已婚夫妇相比,同性已婚夫妇在人口统计学上似乎更加多样化。然而,与异性夫妇一样,来自多个少数群体的同性夫妇结婚的可能性较低。未来的研究需要了解这些差异的驱动因素(如对婚姻的不同态度或缺乏结婚机会)及其影响。政策制定者和临床医生在制定政策和提供服务以支持性少数群体夫妇的福祉时,需要牢记这些群体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信