Correction to "The development of Tibetan children's racial bias in empathy: The mediating role of ethnic identity and wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias" by Sheng et al. (2024).

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
{"title":"Correction to \"The development of Tibetan children's racial bias in empathy: The mediating role of ethnic identity and wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias\" by Sheng et al. (2024).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"The development of Tibetan children's racial bias in empathy: The mediating role of ethnic identity and wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias\" by Jing Sheng, Li Wang, Shuang Lin, Yousong Hu, Yiting Ouyang, Shumin Duan, Shuilian Luo, Qiwen Cai, Yongtao Wu, Wenjun Yan and Jun Chen (<i>Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology</i>, Advanced Online Publication, Apr 11, 2024, np). In the article, the authors wish to remove biased language and inappropriate discussion surrounding the comparison between the Tibetan sample and the non-Tibetan samples, and the text discussing the development of Tibetan children's awareness of their own racial prejudice. The necessary corrections are present in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2024-72017-001).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals often automatically have more empathy for same-race members. However, there are no studies on racial bias in empathy (RBE) among Tibetan school-aged children. The present study aimed to examine the development of RBEs, including racial bias in cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and behavioral empathy, in Tibetan school-aged children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In Experiment 1 (<i>N</i> = 108, aged 7-12), ethnic identity was primed using Tibetan and Han names. Then negative and neutral events were applied to measure the RBEs of Tibetan children. In Experiment 2 (<i>N</i> = 148, aged 7-12), negative events were replaced by pain events. In Experiment 3 (<i>N</i> = 60, aged 7-12), Tibetan children's ethnic identity and the awareness of the wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias were added to examine the underlying mechanism.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Results found that RBEs increased among Tibetan children aged 7-10 and decreased among those aged 11-12, Moreover, we analyzed age as a continuous variable and found that 10 years old was the inflection point in the development of RBEs in Tibetan children. Importantly, children aged 11-12 years old realized more wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias than children aged 7-10. The ethnic identity of Tibetan children aged 7-10 mediated the relation between age group and RBEs. And the wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias mediated the link between age group and RBEs in Tibetan children aged 9-12.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study sheds light on the development of RBEs in Tibetan school-aged children and highlights the importance of identifying the appropriate timing for intervening in prejudice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports an error in "The development of Tibetan children's racial bias in empathy: The mediating role of ethnic identity and wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias" by Jing Sheng, Li Wang, Shuang Lin, Yousong Hu, Yiting Ouyang, Shumin Duan, Shuilian Luo, Qiwen Cai, Yongtao Wu, Wenjun Yan and Jun Chen (Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Apr 11, 2024, np). In the article, the authors wish to remove biased language and inappropriate discussion surrounding the comparison between the Tibetan sample and the non-Tibetan samples, and the text discussing the development of Tibetan children's awareness of their own racial prejudice. The necessary corrections are present in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2024-72017-001).

Objectives: Individuals often automatically have more empathy for same-race members. However, there are no studies on racial bias in empathy (RBE) among Tibetan school-aged children. The present study aimed to examine the development of RBEs, including racial bias in cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and behavioral empathy, in Tibetan school-aged children.

Method: In Experiment 1 (N = 108, aged 7-12), ethnic identity was primed using Tibetan and Han names. Then negative and neutral events were applied to measure the RBEs of Tibetan children. In Experiment 2 (N = 148, aged 7-12), negative events were replaced by pain events. In Experiment 3 (N = 60, aged 7-12), Tibetan children's ethnic identity and the awareness of the wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias were added to examine the underlying mechanism.

Result: Results found that RBEs increased among Tibetan children aged 7-10 and decreased among those aged 11-12, Moreover, we analyzed age as a continuous variable and found that 10 years old was the inflection point in the development of RBEs in Tibetan children. Importantly, children aged 11-12 years old realized more wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias than children aged 7-10. The ethnic identity of Tibetan children aged 7-10 mediated the relation between age group and RBEs. And the wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias mediated the link between age group and RBEs in Tibetan children aged 9-12.

Conclusion: Our study sheds light on the development of RBEs in Tibetan school-aged children and highlights the importance of identifying the appropriate timing for intervening in prejudice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

对 Sheng 等人(2024)的 "藏族儿童移情中种族偏见的发展:民族认同和民族间偏见错误性的中介作用 "的更正。
报告盛静、王丽、林爽、胡友松、欧阳怡婷、段淑敏、罗水莲、蔡启文、吴永涛、闫文君、陈军的《藏族儿童移情中种族偏见的发展:民族认同与族群间偏见错误性的中介作用》(《文化多样性与少数民族心理学》,高级网络版,2024年4月11日,np)中的一处错误。在这篇文章中,作者希望删除藏族样本与非藏族样本对比中的偏颇语言和不当讨论,以及讨论藏族儿童对自身种族偏见的认识发展的文字。勘误中包含必要的更正。(原文摘要如下,载于 2024-72017-001 号记录):个人通常会自动地对同种族成员产生更多的同情。然而,目前还没有关于藏族学龄儿童移情中的种族偏见(RBE)的研究。本研究旨在考察藏族学龄儿童共情种族偏差的发展情况,包括认知共情、情感共情和行为共情中的种族偏差:在实验 1(108 人,7-12 岁)中,使用藏族和汉族的名字作为民族身份的引物。然后应用负面和中性事件来测量藏族儿童的 RBE。实验 2(N = 148,7-12 岁)中,负面事件被疼痛事件取代。在实验 3 中(N = 60,7-12 岁),增加了藏族儿童的民族认同和对民族间偏见错误性的认识,以研究其潜在机制:结果发现,7-10 岁藏族儿童的 RBEs 增加,11-12 岁藏族儿童的 RBEs 减少,而且,我们将年龄作为连续变量进行分析,发现 10 岁是藏族儿童 RBEs 发展的拐点。重要的是,与 7-10 岁的儿童相比,11-12 岁的儿童意识到了更多民族间偏见的错误性。7-10 岁藏族儿童的民族认同在年龄组与 RBE 之间起着中介作用。结论:我们的研究揭示了藏族学龄儿童RBEs的发展,并强调了确定干预偏见的适当时机的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信