Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Posterior-Only Transforaminal Debridement and Interbody Fusion With Preservation of Posterior Ligamentous Complex Versus Conventional Posterior-Only Debridement and Interbody Fusion for Thoracic Spine Tuberculosis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial - A Pilot Study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurospine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2448356.178
Yuxiang Wang, Shuntian Xiao, Guohui Zeng, Hongqi Zhang, Emmanuel Alonge, Zhuocheng Yang
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Posterior-Only Transforaminal Debridement and Interbody Fusion With Preservation of Posterior Ligamentous Complex Versus Conventional Posterior-Only Debridement and Interbody Fusion for Thoracic Spine Tuberculosis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial - A Pilot Study.","authors":"Yuxiang Wang, Shuntian Xiao, Guohui Zeng, Hongqi Zhang, Emmanuel Alonge, Zhuocheng Yang","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448356.178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy and feasibility of surgical management for patients with thoracic spinal tuberculous spondylitis (STB) by using posterior-only transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion (PTDIF) with preservation of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and noninferior of PTDIF compared with conventional posterior-only debridement and interbody fusion (CPDIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2019 to January 2022, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in which patients with thoracic STB were enrolled and assigned to undergo either the PTDIF group (group A) or CPDIF group (group B) in a 1:1 ratio. The clinical efficacy was evaluated on average operation time, blood loss, hospitalization durations, visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index scores, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-Reactive protein (CRP), and neurological function recovery using the American Spinal Injury Association's impairment scale and operative complications. Radiological measurements included kyphosis correction, loss of correction. The outcomes were compared between the groups at preoperation, postoperaion, and final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 65 patients were completely cured during the follow-up. The intraoperative blood loss and operation time in group B were more than that in group A. All patients were pain-free at the final follow-up visit. ESR, CRP returned to normal limits in all patients 3 months after surgery. All patients had improved neurological signs. No significant difference was found in kyphosis angle correction, loss of correction between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTDIF, with preservation of PLC, achieved debridement, decompression, and reconstruction of the spine's stability, similar to CPDIF in the surgical treatment of thoracic STB. PTDIF has less surgical trauma with less intraoperative blood loss and operation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448356.178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy and feasibility of surgical management for patients with thoracic spinal tuberculous spondylitis (STB) by using posterior-only transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion (PTDIF) with preservation of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and noninferior of PTDIF compared with conventional posterior-only debridement and interbody fusion (CPDIF).

Methods: From January 2019 to January 2022, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in which patients with thoracic STB were enrolled and assigned to undergo either the PTDIF group (group A) or CPDIF group (group B) in a 1:1 ratio. The clinical efficacy was evaluated on average operation time, blood loss, hospitalization durations, visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index scores, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-Reactive protein (CRP), and neurological function recovery using the American Spinal Injury Association's impairment scale and operative complications. Radiological measurements included kyphosis correction, loss of correction. The outcomes were compared between the groups at preoperation, postoperaion, and final follow-up.

Results: All 65 patients were completely cured during the follow-up. The intraoperative blood loss and operation time in group B were more than that in group A. All patients were pain-free at the final follow-up visit. ESR, CRP returned to normal limits in all patients 3 months after surgery. All patients had improved neurological signs. No significant difference was found in kyphosis angle correction, loss of correction between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: PTDIF, with preservation of PLC, achieved debridement, decompression, and reconstruction of the spine's stability, similar to CPDIF in the surgical treatment of thoracic STB. PTDIF has less surgical trauma with less intraoperative blood loss and operation time.

单纯后路经椎间孔清创术和保留后路韧带复合体的椎体间融合术与传统的单纯后路清创术和椎体间融合术治疗胸椎结核的临床效果比较:一项前瞻性、随机对照临床试验--试点研究。
研究目的本研究的主要目的是分析对胸椎结核性脊柱炎(STB)患者采用保留后韧带复合体(PLC)的单纯后路经椎间孔清创和椎体间融合术(PTDIF)进行手术治疗的有效性和可行性,以及PTDIF与传统单纯后路清创和椎体间融合术(CPDIF)相比的非劣效性:从2019年1月至2022年1月,我们开展了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,入组胸椎STB患者,并按1:1的比例分配至PTDIF组(A组)或CPDIF组(B组)。临床疗效评估包括平均手术时间、失血量、住院时间、视觉模拟量表、Oswestry残疾指数评分、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、美国脊柱损伤协会损伤量表的神经功能恢复情况以及手术并发症。放射学测量包括脊柱后凸矫正、矫正丧失。两组患者在术前、术后和最终随访时的结果进行了比较:结果:65 名患者在随访期间全部治愈。结果:65 名患者在随访期间均完全治愈,B 组术中失血量和手术时间多于 A 组。术后 3 个月,所有患者的血沉、CRP 均恢复正常。所有患者的神经体征均有所改善。两组患者在脊柱后凸角度矫正和矫正丧失方面无明显差异:结论:在胸椎脊柱侧凸的手术治疗中,PTDIF在保留PLC的情况下实现了清创、减压和脊柱稳定性重建,与CPDIF相似。PTDIF 手术创伤小,术中失血少,手术时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信