Not From Around Here: Evaluation of In-Person Interviews in an Urban General Surgery Residency Program

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Daniel Castellanos MD , Cassie Eno PhD
{"title":"Not From Around Here: Evaluation of In-Person Interviews in an Urban General Surgery Residency Program","authors":"Daniel Castellanos MD ,&nbsp;Cassie Eno PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study used a program evaluation approach to investigate the perceptions of utilizing in-person applicant interviews for a general surgery residency program.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>The study utilized de-identified data routinely collected during the residency program applicant interviews in the General Surgery Residency Program during the fall of 2023. Applicant and faculty/resident exit interview questionnaires were developed to evaluate perceptions of in-person interviewing; the questions were informed by domains for considering the appropriateness and feasibility of continuing in-person interviews as identified by the institution's Graduate Medical Education Committee. Applicants completed the survey at the end of their interview day; faculty and resident interviewers completed the survey following the applicant rank meeting.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The Sponsoring Institution approved a pilot transition from virtual to in-person interviews for the General Surgery Residency Program 2023 recruitment cycle. Surveys were completed electronically.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Sixty-four applicants were interviewed and requested to complete the exit survey. The survey was completed by 55 (Response rate = 86%) program applicants and eight (Response rate = 100%) faculty and residents in the program.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>49.1% of applicants indicated a preference for in-person interviews, 40.0% of applicants indicated a preference to choose and only 10.9% indicated a preference for virtual interviews<em>.</em> Applicants from out-of-state had a significantly higher preference for in-person interviews than those from in-state. Applicants and faculty interviewers perceived in-person interviews to provide a strong assessment of applicants. Applicants from out-of-state had a significantly higher confidence in their ability to demonstrate their strength and assess fit than those from in-state.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While most applicants and faculty interviewers were generally comfortable with an in-person interviewing format, applicants from out-of-state had a particularly high preference for and perception of in-person interviews. General surgery residency programs and sponsoring institutions would benefit from the development of a comprehensive program evaluation strategies for their residency program interviews to make evidence-informed decisions about how best to structure interviews for their programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 12","pages":"Article 103283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study used a program evaluation approach to investigate the perceptions of utilizing in-person applicant interviews for a general surgery residency program.

Design

The study utilized de-identified data routinely collected during the residency program applicant interviews in the General Surgery Residency Program during the fall of 2023. Applicant and faculty/resident exit interview questionnaires were developed to evaluate perceptions of in-person interviewing; the questions were informed by domains for considering the appropriateness and feasibility of continuing in-person interviews as identified by the institution's Graduate Medical Education Committee. Applicants completed the survey at the end of their interview day; faculty and resident interviewers completed the survey following the applicant rank meeting.

Setting

The Sponsoring Institution approved a pilot transition from virtual to in-person interviews for the General Surgery Residency Program 2023 recruitment cycle. Surveys were completed electronically.

Participants

Sixty-four applicants were interviewed and requested to complete the exit survey. The survey was completed by 55 (Response rate = 86%) program applicants and eight (Response rate = 100%) faculty and residents in the program.

Results

49.1% of applicants indicated a preference for in-person interviews, 40.0% of applicants indicated a preference to choose and only 10.9% indicated a preference for virtual interviews. Applicants from out-of-state had a significantly higher preference for in-person interviews than those from in-state. Applicants and faculty interviewers perceived in-person interviews to provide a strong assessment of applicants. Applicants from out-of-state had a significantly higher confidence in their ability to demonstrate their strength and assess fit than those from in-state.

Conclusions

While most applicants and faculty interviewers were generally comfortable with an in-person interviewing format, applicants from out-of-state had a particularly high preference for and perception of in-person interviews. General surgery residency programs and sponsoring institutions would benefit from the development of a comprehensive program evaluation strategies for their residency program interviews to make evidence-informed decisions about how best to structure interviews for their programs.
不是本地人:城市普通外科住院医师培训项目中的面谈评估。
目的本研究采用项目评估的方法,调查普外科住院医师培训项目申请人对亲自面试的看法:本研究利用了 2023 年秋季普外科住院医师项目在住院医师项目申请者面试过程中收集的去身份化数据。申请者和教员/住院医师退出面试问卷是为了评估他们对当面面试的看法而设计的;这些问题是根据该机构的研究生医学教育委员会确定的考虑继续进行当面面试的适当性和可行性的领域而提出的。申请人在面试日结束后填写调查问卷;教师和住院医师面试官在申请人排名会议后填写调查问卷:主办机构批准在普通外科住院医师项目 2023 年招聘周期中试行从虚拟面试到现场面试的过渡。调查以电子方式完成:64名申请人接受了面试,并被要求完成离职调查。55名(回复率=86%)项目申请人和8名(回复率=100%)项目教师和住院医师完成了调查:49.1%的申请人表示倾向于面谈,40.0%的申请人表示倾向于选择,只有10.9%的申请人表示倾向于虚拟面谈。外州申请者对现场面试的偏好明显高于本州申请者。申请者和面试官都认为面对面面试能对申请者进行有力的评估。来自外州的申请者对自己展示实力和评估适合度的信心明显高于来自本州的申请者:虽然大多数申请人和教员面试官对亲自面试的形式普遍感到满意,但来自外州的申请人对亲自面试的偏好和看法尤其高。普外科住院医师培训项目和赞助机构将受益于针对住院医师培训项目面试制定的综合项目评估策略,从而在有据可依的基础上决定如何最好地组织项目面试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信