Iliotibial-Band and Gluteus Medius Percutaneous Ultrasound Tenotomy for Refractory Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Longitudinal Observational Study with One-Year Durability Results.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Sandeep Yerra, Tahereh Naeimi, Alan D Kaye, Ferdinand J Chan, David Gonzalez, Ugur Yener, Sayed Emal Wahezi
{"title":"Iliotibial-Band and Gluteus Medius Percutaneous Ultrasound Tenotomy for Refractory Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Longitudinal Observational Study with One-Year Durability Results.","authors":"Sandeep Yerra, Tahereh Naeimi, Alan D Kaye, Ferdinand J Chan, David Gonzalez, Ugur Yener, Sayed Emal Wahezi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a common cause of lateral hip pain that affects patients' quality of life and functioning. The condition is often associated with tightness of the iliotibial band (ITB) and tendinopathy of the gluteus medius (GMed) tendon, which are subjected to excessive stress and inflammation. A traditional treatment for GTPS is conservative medical management (CMM), which includes but is not limited to physiotherapy, oral anti-inflammatory medication, and/or local steroid injections. Surgery is performed when these treatments fail. The failure of these techniques indicates that some treatments classified as CMM may not be feasible for some patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined GMed and ITB injections for a cohort of CMM-refractory GTPS patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center, academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 01/01/2022 and 12/31/2022, a retrospective analysis of 68 hips that underwent combination GMed-ITB percutaneous ultrasound tenotomy (PUT) was performed. The primary outcome measure was a numeric rating scale (NRS) for hip pain, and the secondary outcome measures were VISA-G (Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Gluteal Tendinopathy) scores, sitting-to-standing and walking tolerance, and side-lying tolerance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients' NRS scores decreased, and the VISA-G scores and all functional measures increased one year after the procedure, indicating significant improvement in pain and functioning (P < 0.001). Treatment success, defined as 50% reduction in pain and side-lying tolerance, was achieved by 83% of the patients. No major complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The lack of a comparable cohort reduces the data's interpretative significance. Having a control arm would have enabled a statistical comparison between treated and untreated patients to provide a valid assessment of the procedure's benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of combined GMed-ITB PUT as a novel treatment for GTPS in patients who failed CMM. The results showed significant and durable improvement in pain, function, and quality of life at the one-year follow-up. Our study suggests that both ITB and GMed tendons are involved in the pathogenesis of GTPS. The present study compared favorably with previous studies that reported outcomes of either ITB PUT or GMed PUT alone, implying that combining the approaches may offer superior benefits. Furthermore, the study had several strengths, such as the use of a validated outcome measure (VISA-G), the elimination of bias by independent practitioners, and the inclusion of a difficult population with severe pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a common cause of lateral hip pain that affects patients' quality of life and functioning. The condition is often associated with tightness of the iliotibial band (ITB) and tendinopathy of the gluteus medius (GMed) tendon, which are subjected to excessive stress and inflammation. A traditional treatment for GTPS is conservative medical management (CMM), which includes but is not limited to physiotherapy, oral anti-inflammatory medication, and/or local steroid injections. Surgery is performed when these treatments fail. The failure of these techniques indicates that some treatments classified as CMM may not be feasible for some patients.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined GMed and ITB injections for a cohort of CMM-refractory GTPS patients.

Study design: A retrospective chart review.

Setting: Single-center, academic hospital.

Methods: Between 01/01/2022 and 12/31/2022, a retrospective analysis of 68 hips that underwent combination GMed-ITB percutaneous ultrasound tenotomy (PUT) was performed. The primary outcome measure was a numeric rating scale (NRS) for hip pain, and the secondary outcome measures were VISA-G (Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Gluteal Tendinopathy) scores, sitting-to-standing and walking tolerance, and side-lying tolerance.

Results: The patients' NRS scores decreased, and the VISA-G scores and all functional measures increased one year after the procedure, indicating significant improvement in pain and functioning (P < 0.001). Treatment success, defined as 50% reduction in pain and side-lying tolerance, was achieved by 83% of the patients. No major complications were reported.

Limitations: The lack of a comparable cohort reduces the data's interpretative significance. Having a control arm would have enabled a statistical comparison between treated and untreated patients to provide a valid assessment of the procedure's benefit.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of combined GMed-ITB PUT as a novel treatment for GTPS in patients who failed CMM. The results showed significant and durable improvement in pain, function, and quality of life at the one-year follow-up. Our study suggests that both ITB and GMed tendons are involved in the pathogenesis of GTPS. The present study compared favorably with previous studies that reported outcomes of either ITB PUT or GMed PUT alone, implying that combining the approaches may offer superior benefits. Furthermore, the study had several strengths, such as the use of a validated outcome measure (VISA-G), the elimination of bias by independent practitioners, and the inclusion of a difficult population with severe pain.

髂胫束和臀中肌经皮超声腱切开术治疗难治性转子痛综合征:纵向观察研究与一年耐久性结果。
背景:大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)是髋关节外侧疼痛的常见原因,影响患者的生活质量和功能。该病症通常与髂胫束(ITB)和臀中肌(GMed)肌腱过度紧张和炎症有关。GTPS 的传统治疗方法是保守疗法(CMM),包括但不限于物理治疗、口服消炎药和/或局部类固醇注射。当这些治疗方法无效时,就需要进行手术治疗。这些技术的失败表明,某些被归类为 CMM 的治疗方法对某些患者来说可能并不可行:本研究旨在评估对CMM难治性GTPS患者进行GMed和ITB联合注射的疗效和安全性:研究设计:回顾性病历审查:单中心学术医院:在 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间,对 68 例接受 GMed-ITB 经皮超声腱切开术 (PUT) 的髋关节进行了回顾性分析。主要结果指标是髋关节疼痛的数字评分量表(NRS),次要结果指标是VISA-G(维多利亚运动评估研究所-臀部肌腱病)评分、坐立和行走耐受力以及侧卧耐受力:术后一年,患者的 NRS 评分下降,VISA-G 评分和所有功能指标均有所上升,表明疼痛和功能均有显著改善(P < 0.001)。83%的患者治疗成功,即疼痛和侧卧耐受性减少50%。无重大并发症报告:局限性:缺乏可比队列降低了数据的解释意义。如果有对照组,就能对接受治疗和未接受治疗的患者进行统计比较,从而对手术的益处进行有效评估:这项研究证明了GMed-ITB PUT联合疗法作为治疗CMM失败患者GTPS的新疗法的可行性和有效性。结果显示,随访一年后,患者的疼痛、功能和生活质量都得到了明显而持久的改善。我们的研究表明,ITB 和 GMed 肌腱都参与了 GTPS 的发病机制。本研究与以往报告单独使用 ITB PUT 或 GMed PUT 治疗效果的研究相比效果更佳,这意味着将两种方法结合使用可能会带来更好的疗效。此外,该研究还具有一些优点,如使用了经过验证的结果测量方法(VISA-G)、消除了独立从业人员的偏见以及纳入了具有严重疼痛的困难人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信