The Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenosis in Japan: A Subanalysis of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 4.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2024-11-15 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0115
Satoru Fujiwara, Akira Ishii, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Nobuyuki Ohara, Michi Kawamoto, Koji Iihara, Hirotoshi Imamura, Yuji Matsumaru, Chiaki Sakai, Tetsu Satow, Shinichi Yoshimura, Nobuyuki Sakai
{"title":"The Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenosis in Japan: A Subanalysis of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 4.","authors":"Satoru Fujiwara, Akira Ishii, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Nobuyuki Ohara, Michi Kawamoto, Koji Iihara, Hirotoshi Imamura, Yuji Matsumaru, Chiaki Sakai, Tetsu Satow, Shinichi Yoshimura, Nobuyuki Sakai","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a potential therapeutic option for extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenosis; however, its efficacy or optimal procedures remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the recent status of EVT for extracranial VA stenosis in Japan using a nationwide registry. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 4 that enrolled patients who underwent EVT at 166 hospitals in Japan from 2015 to 2019. The outcomes of this study were as follows: procedural success indicating that the planned procedure was completed, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 30 days, and procedure-related complications evaluated according to the procedure during EVT (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty vs. stenting and with or without the use of embolic protection devices [EPDs]). Of 308 eligible patients, 301 (95%) were treated for atherosclerotic stenosis, predominantly by stenting (74%). EPDs were used in 43%, primarily with the distal balloon (63%). The proportion of procedural success was 98%. Functional independence (mRS of 0-2) at 30 days was achieved in 80% of the total cohort, and there were no differences between patients treated with or without stenting or EPDs (74% vs. 82%, p = 0.12, and 80% vs. 80%, p = 0.93). Procedural complications occurred in 28 (9.1%) patients similarly in each group, with distal embolism and vessel dissection being common. In conclusion, EVT is a reasonable option for extracranial VA stenosis as a daily clinical practice. This study emphasizes the potential of EVT in managing extracranial VA stenosis and the need for further research to refine treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"387-394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a potential therapeutic option for extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenosis; however, its efficacy or optimal procedures remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the recent status of EVT for extracranial VA stenosis in Japan using a nationwide registry. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 4 that enrolled patients who underwent EVT at 166 hospitals in Japan from 2015 to 2019. The outcomes of this study were as follows: procedural success indicating that the planned procedure was completed, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 30 days, and procedure-related complications evaluated according to the procedure during EVT (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty vs. stenting and with or without the use of embolic protection devices [EPDs]). Of 308 eligible patients, 301 (95%) were treated for atherosclerotic stenosis, predominantly by stenting (74%). EPDs were used in 43%, primarily with the distal balloon (63%). The proportion of procedural success was 98%. Functional independence (mRS of 0-2) at 30 days was achieved in 80% of the total cohort, and there were no differences between patients treated with or without stenting or EPDs (74% vs. 82%, p = 0.12, and 80% vs. 80%, p = 0.93). Procedural complications occurred in 28 (9.1%) patients similarly in each group, with distal embolism and vessel dissection being common. In conclusion, EVT is a reasonable option for extracranial VA stenosis as a daily clinical practice. This study emphasizes the potential of EVT in managing extracranial VA stenosis and the need for further research to refine treatment strategies.

日本颅外椎动脉狭窄的血管内治疗现状:日本神经血管内治疗注册的子分析 4.
血管内治疗(EVT)是治疗颅外椎动脉(VA)狭窄的一种潜在疗法;然而,其疗效或最佳治疗程序仍是未知数。本研究旨在通过一项全国范围的登记,调查日本颅外椎动脉狭窄的 EVT 近况。我们对 "日本神经血管内治疗登记 4 "进行了事后分析,该登记纳入了 2015 年至 2019 年期间在日本 166 家医院接受 EVT 的患者。这项研究的结果如下:程序成功表示计划的程序已完成、30 天时的改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分,以及根据 EVT 期间的程序(经皮腔内血管成形术与支架植入术,以及使用或不使用栓塞保护装置 [EPDs])评估的程序相关并发症。在308名符合条件的患者中,301人(95%)接受了动脉粥样硬化性狭窄治疗,主要是支架植入术(74%)。43%的患者使用了EPD,主要是远端球囊(63%)。手术成功率为 98%。80%的患者在 30 天后实现了功能独立(mRS 为 0-2),使用或不使用支架或 EPD 治疗的患者之间没有差异(74% 对 82%,p = 0.12;80% 对 80%,p = 0.93)。两组患者中均有 28 例(9.1%)发生了手术并发症,其中远端栓塞和血管夹层较为常见。总之,在日常临床实践中,EVT 是治疗颅外血管狭窄的合理选择。本研究强调了EVT在治疗颅外血管狭窄方面的潜力,以及进一步研究完善治疗策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信