Impact of Frailty Risk on Functional Outcome after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Historical Cohort Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yoshinori Yamamoto, Shinsuke Hori, Kenta Ushida, Yuka Shirai, Miho Shimizu, Yuki Kato, Ryo Momosaki
{"title":"Impact of Frailty Risk on Functional Outcome after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Historical Cohort Study.","authors":"Yoshinori Yamamoto, Shinsuke Hori, Kenta Ushida, Yuka Shirai, Miho Shimizu, Yuki Kato, Ryo Momosaki","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) as a predictor of adverse events post-hospitalization in a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures due to aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). This historical cohort study analyzed the data of patients hospitalized with aneurysmal SAH (n = 1,343) between April 2014 and August 2020 who were registered in the JMDC database. We used HFRS to classify the patients into the low-frailty risk group (HFRS < 5) and high-frailty risk group (HFRS ≥ 5). The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 points at discharge. Of 1,343 patients, 1,001 (74.5%) and 342 (25.5%) were in the low- and high-frailty risk groups, respectively. A high-frailty risk was negatively associated with a mRS score of 0-2 at discharge (high-frailty risk group: odds ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3-0.6) and home discharge (high-frailty risk group: odds ratio 0.5; 95% CI: 0.4-0.7). A high-frailty risk was negatively associated with Barthel Index gain (high-frailty risk group: coefficient -10.4, 95% CI: -14.7 to -6.2) and had a longer length of stay (high-frailty risk group: coefficient 8.4, 95% CI: 5.1-11.7). HFRS could predict adverse outcomes during hospitalization of aneurysmal SAH patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated the utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) as a predictor of adverse events post-hospitalization in a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures due to aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). This historical cohort study analyzed the data of patients hospitalized with aneurysmal SAH (n = 1,343) between April 2014 and August 2020 who were registered in the JMDC database. We used HFRS to classify the patients into the low-frailty risk group (HFRS < 5) and high-frailty risk group (HFRS ≥ 5). The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 points at discharge. Of 1,343 patients, 1,001 (74.5%) and 342 (25.5%) were in the low- and high-frailty risk groups, respectively. A high-frailty risk was negatively associated with a mRS score of 0-2 at discharge (high-frailty risk group: odds ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3-0.6) and home discharge (high-frailty risk group: odds ratio 0.5; 95% CI: 0.4-0.7). A high-frailty risk was negatively associated with Barthel Index gain (high-frailty risk group: coefficient -10.4, 95% CI: -14.7 to -6.2) and had a longer length of stay (high-frailty risk group: coefficient 8.4, 95% CI: 5.1-11.7). HFRS could predict adverse outcomes during hospitalization of aneurysmal SAH patients.

虚弱风险对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后功能预后的影响:历史队列研究
我们对因动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)而接受神经外科手术的患者进行了回顾性分析,评估了医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)作为住院后不良事件预测指标的实用性。这项历史队列研究分析了2014年4月至2020年8月期间在JMDC数据库登记的动脉瘤性SAH住院患者(n = 1,343)的数据。我们使用 HFRS 将患者分为低虚弱风险组(HFRS < 5)和高虚弱风险组(HFRS ≥ 5)。主要结果是出院时改良朗肯量表(mRS)评分为 0-2 分。在 1343 名患者中,分别有 1001 人(74.5%)和 342 人(25.5%)属于低虚弱风险组和高虚弱风险组。高虚弱风险与出院时 mRS 评分为 0-2 分呈负相关(高虚弱风险组:几率比 0.4;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.3-0.6):0.3-0.6)和出院回家(高体弱风险组:几率比 0.5;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.4-0.7)。高虚弱风险与 Barthel 指数的增加呈负相关(高虚弱风险组:系数-10.4,95% CI:-14.7 至 -6.2),并且住院时间更长(高虚弱风险组:系数 8.4,95% CI:5.1 至 11.7)。HFRS可预测动脉瘤性SAH患者住院期间的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信