Jaime Kulisevsky, Henrique B Ferraz, Antonio Suppa, Heinz Reichmann
{"title":"Effects of Safinamide on Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Motor Fluctuations.","authors":"Jaime Kulisevsky, Henrique B Ferraz, Antonio Suppa, Heinz Reichmann","doi":"10.1159/000541362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) involves the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons, leading to motor and non-motor symptoms that significantly impact patients' quality of life. Safinamide modulates dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems, offering a promising treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of safinamide as an add-on therapy to levodopa for PD patients with motor fluctuations. Following PRISMA guidelines, literature searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase (2014-2022). Inclusion criteria were studies on adult PD patients receiving safinamide with levodopa. Outcomes included on-time without troublesome dyskinesia, off-time, UPDRS Part III motor scores, UPDRS Part II activities of daily living scores, PDQ-39 emotional well-being, and GRID-HAMD scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among thirteen eligible studies, safinamide significantly improved on-time without troublesome dyskinesia at 100 mg/day (mean difference [MD]: -0.90; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.67; p < 0.00001) and 50 mg/day (MD: -0.77; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.34; p = 0.0005) compared to placebo. It also reduced off-time (100 mg/day: MD: -0.94; 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.70; p < 0.00001; 50 mg/day: MD: -0.72; 95% CI: -1.03 to -0.41; p < 0.00001) and improved UPDRS-III motor scores (100 mg/day: MD: -3.01; 95% CI: -4.15 to -1.86; p < 0.00001; 50 mg/day: MD: -2.93; 95% CI: -5.14 to -0.71; p = 0.001). Mood improvements were noted in PDQ-39 emotional well-being scores (MD: -5.22; 95% CI: -6.90 to -3.54) and GRID-HAMD scores (MD: -0.60; 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.25; p = 0.0009). Safinamide also positively affected pain (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to placebo, safinamide significantly benefits motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients, but further research is necessary to fully explore its therapeutic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"291-305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) involves the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons, leading to motor and non-motor symptoms that significantly impact patients' quality of life. Safinamide modulates dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems, offering a promising treatment approach.
Methods: This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of safinamide as an add-on therapy to levodopa for PD patients with motor fluctuations. Following PRISMA guidelines, literature searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase (2014-2022). Inclusion criteria were studies on adult PD patients receiving safinamide with levodopa. Outcomes included on-time without troublesome dyskinesia, off-time, UPDRS Part III motor scores, UPDRS Part II activities of daily living scores, PDQ-39 emotional well-being, and GRID-HAMD scores.
Results: Among thirteen eligible studies, safinamide significantly improved on-time without troublesome dyskinesia at 100 mg/day (mean difference [MD]: -0.90; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.67; p < 0.00001) and 50 mg/day (MD: -0.77; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.34; p = 0.0005) compared to placebo. It also reduced off-time (100 mg/day: MD: -0.94; 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.70; p < 0.00001; 50 mg/day: MD: -0.72; 95% CI: -1.03 to -0.41; p < 0.00001) and improved UPDRS-III motor scores (100 mg/day: MD: -3.01; 95% CI: -4.15 to -1.86; p < 0.00001; 50 mg/day: MD: -2.93; 95% CI: -5.14 to -0.71; p = 0.001). Mood improvements were noted in PDQ-39 emotional well-being scores (MD: -5.22; 95% CI: -6.90 to -3.54) and GRID-HAMD scores (MD: -0.60; 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.25; p = 0.0009). Safinamide also positively affected pain (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.18).
Conclusion: Compared to placebo, safinamide significantly benefits motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients, but further research is necessary to fully explore its therapeutic potential.
简介帕金森病(Parkinson's disease,PD)是一种多巴胺能神经元逐渐丧失的疾病,会导致运动和非运动症状,严重影响患者的生活质量。沙芬那胺能调节多巴胺能和谷氨酸能系统,是一种很有前景的治疗方法:这项荟萃分析评估了沙芬那胺作为左旋多巴的附加疗法对伴有运动波动的帕金森病患者的疗效。根据PRISMA指南,在PubMed和Embase(2014-2022年)中进行了文献检索。纳入标准是有关成年帕金森病患者接受沙芬胺与左旋多巴治疗的研究。研究结果包括按时服药而无运动障碍、非按时服药、UPDRS 第三部分运动评分、UPDRS 第二部分日常生活活动评分、PDQ-39 情绪健康评分和 GRID-HAMD 评分:在13项符合条件的研究中,与安慰剂相比,100毫克/天(平均差(MD):-0.90;95% CI-1.12至-0.67;P<0.00001)和50毫克/天(MD:-0.77;95% CI-1.21至-0.34;P=0.0005)的沙芬那胺可明显改善无运动障碍的开动时间。它还能减少脱机时间(100 毫克/天:MD: -0.94; 95% CI -1.19 to -0.70; P<0.00001; 50 mg/天:MD:-0.72;95% CI -1.03 至 -0.41;P<0.00001),并改善 UPDRS-III 运动评分(100 mg/天:MD: -3.01; 95% CI -4.15 to -1.86; P<0.00001; 50 mg/天:MD: -2.93; 95% CI -5.14 to -0.71; P=0.001)。PDQ-39情绪健康评分(MD:-5.22;95% CI -6.90至-3.54)和GRID-HAMD评分(MD:-0.60;95% CI -0.95至-0.25;P=0.0009)均有改善。萨非那胺对疼痛也有积极影响(RR:1.10;95% CI 1.03 至 1.18):与安慰剂相比,沙芬那胺能明显改善帕金森病患者的运动和非运动症状,但要充分挖掘其治疗潜力,还需要进一步的研究。
期刊介绍:
''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.