Iria Santos, Miguel A. Casal, João Correia, Álvaro Torrente-Patiño, Penousal Machado, Juan Romero
{"title":"Towards Robust Evaluation of Aesthetic and Photographic Quality Metrics: Insights from a Comprehensive Dataset","authors":"Iria Santos, Miguel A. Casal, João Correia, Álvaro Torrente-Patiño, Penousal Machado, Juan Romero","doi":"10.1155/2024/8223586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In recent years, the development of metrics to evaluate image aesthetics and photographic quality has proliferated. However, validating these metrics presents challenges due to the inherently subjective nature of aesthetics and photographic quality, which can be influenced by cultural contexts and individual preferences that evolve over time. This article presents a novel validation methodology utilizing a dataset assessed by individuals from two distinct nationalities: the United States and Spain. Evaluation criteria include photographic quality and aesthetic value, with the dataset comprising images previously rated on the DPChallenge photographic portal. We analyze the correlation between these values and provide the dataset for future research endeavors. Our investigation encompasses several metrics, including BRISQUE for assessing photographic quality, NIMA aesthetic and NIMA technical for evaluating both aesthetic and technical aspects, Diffusion Aesthetics (employed in Stable Diffusion), and PhotoILike for gauging the commercial appeal of real estate images. Our findings reveal a significant correlation between the Diffusion Aesthetics metric and aesthetic measures, as well as with the NIMA aesthetics metric, suggesting them as good potential candidates to capture aesthetic value.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50653,"journal":{"name":"Complexity","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8223586","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8223586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, the development of metrics to evaluate image aesthetics and photographic quality has proliferated. However, validating these metrics presents challenges due to the inherently subjective nature of aesthetics and photographic quality, which can be influenced by cultural contexts and individual preferences that evolve over time. This article presents a novel validation methodology utilizing a dataset assessed by individuals from two distinct nationalities: the United States and Spain. Evaluation criteria include photographic quality and aesthetic value, with the dataset comprising images previously rated on the DPChallenge photographic portal. We analyze the correlation between these values and provide the dataset for future research endeavors. Our investigation encompasses several metrics, including BRISQUE for assessing photographic quality, NIMA aesthetic and NIMA technical for evaluating both aesthetic and technical aspects, Diffusion Aesthetics (employed in Stable Diffusion), and PhotoILike for gauging the commercial appeal of real estate images. Our findings reveal a significant correlation between the Diffusion Aesthetics metric and aesthetic measures, as well as with the NIMA aesthetics metric, suggesting them as good potential candidates to capture aesthetic value.
期刊介绍:
Complexity is a cross-disciplinary journal focusing on the rapidly expanding science of complex adaptive systems. The purpose of the journal is to advance the science of complexity. Articles may deal with such methodological themes as chaos, genetic algorithms, cellular automata, neural networks, and evolutionary game theory. Papers treating applications in any area of natural science or human endeavor are welcome, and especially encouraged are papers integrating conceptual themes and applications that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. Complexity is not meant to serve as a forum for speculation and vague analogies between words like “chaos,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” that are often used in completely different ways in science and in daily life.