Personal Psychedelic Experience as a Training Qualification for Facilitators: A Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Interviews with Psilocybin Experts.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ar Wilson-Poe, Ka Hoffman, K Pertl, Jb Luoma, A Bazinet, Cs Stauffer, D McCarty, Pt Korthuis
{"title":"Personal Psychedelic Experience as a Training Qualification for Facilitators: A Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Interviews with Psilocybin Experts.","authors":"Ar Wilson-Poe, Ka Hoffman, K Pertl, Jb Luoma, A Bazinet, Cs Stauffer, D McCarty, Pt Korthuis","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2024.2401982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emerging legal frameworks in Oregon and Colorado license facilitators to support adults receiving psychedelic services. The current legal frameworks are silent regarding facilitators' personal experience with psychedelics. An e-Delphi process recruited 36 experts with at least 5 years' experience facilitating psilocybin experiences in ceremonial settings, indigenous practices, or clinical trials. Respondents completed in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews via secure web links. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Thematic Analysis. Experts with a mean of 15.2 (SD 13.1) years' experience providing psilocybin services expressed the importance of first-hand experience with psychedelics as a qualification for the emerging workforce. One participant questioned the necessity of personal psychedelic experience. Experts suggested that personal experience may indirectly support high-quality care because it enhances facilitators' personal wellbeing, and may help facilitators understand the complexity and nature of their clients' psychedelic experiences. Novel state-legal psychedelic paradigms create a real-world opportunity to assess associations between facilitators' personal psychedelic experience and the safety and outcomes of psychedelic services.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2024.2401982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerging legal frameworks in Oregon and Colorado license facilitators to support adults receiving psychedelic services. The current legal frameworks are silent regarding facilitators' personal experience with psychedelics. An e-Delphi process recruited 36 experts with at least 5 years' experience facilitating psilocybin experiences in ceremonial settings, indigenous practices, or clinical trials. Respondents completed in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews via secure web links. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Thematic Analysis. Experts with a mean of 15.2 (SD 13.1) years' experience providing psilocybin services expressed the importance of first-hand experience with psychedelics as a qualification for the emerging workforce. One participant questioned the necessity of personal psychedelic experience. Experts suggested that personal experience may indirectly support high-quality care because it enhances facilitators' personal wellbeing, and may help facilitators understand the complexity and nature of their clients' psychedelic experiences. Novel state-legal psychedelic paradigms create a real-world opportunity to assess associations between facilitators' personal psychedelic experience and the safety and outcomes of psychedelic services.

将个人迷幻体验作为促进者的培训资格:对迷幻剂专家定性访谈的主题分析。
俄勒冈州和科罗拉多州新出现的法律框架允许促进者为接受迷幻药服务的成年人提供支持。目前的法律框架对促进者使用迷幻药的个人经历只字未提。我们通过电子德尔菲程序招募了 36 名专家,他们至少有 5 年在仪式环境、土著实践或临床试验中促进迷幻剂体验的经验。受访者通过安全的网络链接完成了深入的半结构化定性访谈。对访谈进行了记录、转录,并使用主题分析法进行了分析。平均拥有 15.2 年(标准差 13.1 年)提供迷幻剂服务经验的专家们表示,对于新兴的从业人员来说,拥有使用迷幻剂的第一手经验非常重要。一位与会者对个人迷幻药经验的必要性提出了质疑。专家建议,个人经历可以间接支持高质量的护理,因为它可以提高促进者的个人幸福感,还可以帮助促进者理解客户迷幻体验的复杂性和性质。国家合法的新型迷幻药范例为评估促进者的个人迷幻药体验与迷幻药服务的安全性和结果之间的关联创造了一个现实的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信