Valentin Loser, Andrea O Rossetti, Marija Rasic, Jan Novy, Kaspar A Schindler, Stephan Rüegg, Vincent Alvarez, Isabelle Beuchat
{"title":"Relevance of Continuous EEG versus Routine EEG for Outcome Prediction after Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Valentin Loser, Andrea O Rossetti, Marija Rasic, Jan Novy, Kaspar A Schindler, Stephan Rüegg, Vincent Alvarez, Isabelle Beuchat","doi":"10.1159/000541335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In a cohort of adult patients with disturbance of consciousness after TBI, we aimed to explore the relationship of continuous video-EEG (cEEG) versus routine EEG (rEEG) with mortality and functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (CERTA), in which adults with disorder of consciousness and needing EEG (excluding those with proven seizures/SE just before) were randomized 1:1 to cEEG or two rEEG. In TBI patients, correlation between EEG duration, mortality, and modified Rankin score (mRs, good 0-2) at 6 months was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 364 patients, 44 presenting with consciousness impairment after TBI were included; 29 randomized to cEEG and 15 to rEEG. Mortality (p = 0.88) and functional outcome (p = 0.58) at 6 months were similar between groups. There was a nonsignificant tendency toward more seizure/status epilepticus detection with cEEG (p = 0.08). In multivariable regression, cEEG was not related to functional outcome (OR: 0.75 [0.13-4.24], p = 0.745) or mortality (OR: 7.11 [0.51-99.32], p = 0.145).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite allowing increased seizure detections in TBI patients, cEEG does not seem to be associated with better functional outcome or mortality over rEEG. Pending larger trials, repeated rEEG might be acceptable in post-TBI disorder of consciousness, especially in resource-limited environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"306-311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In a cohort of adult patients with disturbance of consciousness after TBI, we aimed to explore the relationship of continuous video-EEG (cEEG) versus routine EEG (rEEG) with mortality and functional outcome.
Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (CERTA), in which adults with disorder of consciousness and needing EEG (excluding those with proven seizures/SE just before) were randomized 1:1 to cEEG or two rEEG. In TBI patients, correlation between EEG duration, mortality, and modified Rankin score (mRs, good 0-2) at 6 months was assessed.
Results: Among 364 patients, 44 presenting with consciousness impairment after TBI were included; 29 randomized to cEEG and 15 to rEEG. Mortality (p = 0.88) and functional outcome (p = 0.58) at 6 months were similar between groups. There was a nonsignificant tendency toward more seizure/status epilepticus detection with cEEG (p = 0.08). In multivariable regression, cEEG was not related to functional outcome (OR: 0.75 [0.13-4.24], p = 0.745) or mortality (OR: 7.11 [0.51-99.32], p = 0.145).
Conclusion: Despite allowing increased seizure detections in TBI patients, cEEG does not seem to be associated with better functional outcome or mortality over rEEG. Pending larger trials, repeated rEEG might be acceptable in post-TBI disorder of consciousness, especially in resource-limited environments.
期刊介绍:
''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.