How Do Patients and Their Supports Experience Temperament Based Therapy With Support (TBT-S)? A Qualitative Study

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Kristin Stedal, Ingrid Funderud, Katarina Lindstedt
{"title":"How Do Patients and Their Supports Experience Temperament Based Therapy With Support (TBT-S)? A Qualitative Study","authors":"Kristin Stedal,&nbsp;Ingrid Funderud,&nbsp;Katarina Lindstedt","doi":"10.1002/eat.24289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Temperament Based Therapy with Support (TBT-S) is an emerging intervention based on empirically supported neurobiological models. Due to its novelty, only a handful of studies to date have examined TBT-S, and none of these previous studies have provided a qualitative evaluation of how TBT-S is perceived by the target population. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to provide an increased understanding of how TBT-S is experienced by patients with an eating disorder and their supports.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-six patients with an eating disorder and 63 supports consented to be included in the study. The participants provided written responses to six open-ended questions during the post-treatment assessment, detailing their treatment experiences and offering additional feedback. Thematic analysis (TA) was used to analyze their written responses, aiming for a combination of latent and semantic themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results reveal a substantial overlap between patients' and supports' experiences with TBT-S. In both groups, identified themes suggest increased knowledge and hopefulness as key benefits of the intervention. While both patients and support persons considered TBT-S to be worthwhile, patients also reported finding the intervention quite challenging. Additionally, both groups emphasized the neurobiological rationale as an essential component of TBT-S.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The qualitative evaluations from this study offer new insights into how TBT-S is experienced by the target population. The findings provide an opportunity to incorporate participant suggestions for improving the treatment, and serve as an important building block for future studies aimed at assessing the effectiveness of TBT-S as an augmentation to treatment-as-usual.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"57 12","pages":"2370-2379"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eat.24289","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Temperament Based Therapy with Support (TBT-S) is an emerging intervention based on empirically supported neurobiological models. Due to its novelty, only a handful of studies to date have examined TBT-S, and none of these previous studies have provided a qualitative evaluation of how TBT-S is perceived by the target population. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to provide an increased understanding of how TBT-S is experienced by patients with an eating disorder and their supports.

Method

Forty-six patients with an eating disorder and 63 supports consented to be included in the study. The participants provided written responses to six open-ended questions during the post-treatment assessment, detailing their treatment experiences and offering additional feedback. Thematic analysis (TA) was used to analyze their written responses, aiming for a combination of latent and semantic themes.

Results

The results reveal a substantial overlap between patients' and supports' experiences with TBT-S. In both groups, identified themes suggest increased knowledge and hopefulness as key benefits of the intervention. While both patients and support persons considered TBT-S to be worthwhile, patients also reported finding the intervention quite challenging. Additionally, both groups emphasized the neurobiological rationale as an essential component of TBT-S.

Conclusions

The qualitative evaluations from this study offer new insights into how TBT-S is experienced by the target population. The findings provide an opportunity to incorporate participant suggestions for improving the treatment, and serve as an important building block for future studies aimed at assessing the effectiveness of TBT-S as an augmentation to treatment-as-usual.

Abstract Image

患者及其支持者如何体验支持性气质疗法(TBT-S)?定性研究
背景情绪支持疗法(TBT-S)是一种基于经验支持的神经生物学模型的新兴干预方法。由于它的新颖性,迄今为止只有少数几项研究对 TBT-S 进行了研究,而且这些研究都没有对目标人群如何看待 TBT-S 进行定性评估。因此,本研究旨在进一步了解进食障碍患者及其支持者是如何体验 TBT-S 的。在治疗后评估过程中,参与者对六个开放式问题进行了书面回答,详细介绍了他们的治疗经历并提供了其他反馈意见。研究采用主题分析法(TA)对他们的书面回答进行分析,旨在将潜在主题和语义主题相结合。在这两个群体中,已确定的主题表明,增加知识和充满希望是干预的主要益处。虽然患者和支持者都认为 TBT-S 是值得的,但患者也报告说他们发现这项干预相当具有挑战性。此外,两个小组都强调神经生物学原理是 TBT-S 的重要组成部分。结论本研究的定性评估为了解目标人群如何体验 TBT-S 提供了新的视角。研究结果提供了一个机会,可借以采纳参与者的建议,改进治疗方法,并为今后旨在评估 TBT-S 作为常规治疗的辅助手段的有效性的研究提供重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信