Comparing educational frameworks: unpacking differences between fink's and bloom's taxonomies in nursing education

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING
Beverly W. Dabney PhD, RN , Fatima Eid MPH
{"title":"Comparing educational frameworks: unpacking differences between fink's and bloom's taxonomies in nursing education","authors":"Beverly W. Dabney PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Fatima Eid MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Modern healthcare's dynamic and complex nature demands that nursing education evolves. Traditional reliance on Bloom's Taxonomy, while effective for cognitive development, falls short of addressing the holistic needs of nursing education. The integration of affective and practical dimensions is crucial, making Fink's Taxonomy of Significant Learning a valuable alternative.</p></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><p>Fink's Taxonomy, introduced in 2003, extends beyond the cognitive to include the human dimension, caring, and learning how to learn. These domains are vital for preparing nurses who can apply their knowledge effectively in diverse healthcare settings. This article delves into the benefits and challenges of implementing Fink's Taxonomy in nursing education and its compatibility with the profession's evolving demands. It also underscores the scant research on its application in nursing education, advocating for comprehensive studies.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>Adopting Fink's Taxonomy could enhance the competence, empathy, and adaptability of nursing professionals, better equipping them for modern healthcare challenges. To ascertain Fink's efficacy in developing nursing skills and competencies, extensive research employing varied methodologies is imperative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Modern healthcare's dynamic and complex nature demands that nursing education evolves. Traditional reliance on Bloom's Taxonomy, while effective for cognitive development, falls short of addressing the holistic needs of nursing education. The integration of affective and practical dimensions is crucial, making Fink's Taxonomy of Significant Learning a valuable alternative.

Summary

Fink's Taxonomy, introduced in 2003, extends beyond the cognitive to include the human dimension, caring, and learning how to learn. These domains are vital for preparing nurses who can apply their knowledge effectively in diverse healthcare settings. This article delves into the benefits and challenges of implementing Fink's Taxonomy in nursing education and its compatibility with the profession's evolving demands. It also underscores the scant research on its application in nursing education, advocating for comprehensive studies.

Discussion and conclusion

Adopting Fink's Taxonomy could enhance the competence, empathy, and adaptability of nursing professionals, better equipping them for modern healthcare challenges. To ascertain Fink's efficacy in developing nursing skills and competencies, extensive research employing varied methodologies is imperative.

比较教育框架:解读芬克分类法和布鲁姆分类法在护理教育中的差异
背景现代医疗保健的动态性和复杂性要求护理教育不断发展。传统的布鲁姆分类法虽然对认知发展有效,但无法满足护理教育的整体需求。摘要芬克的分类法于 2003 年推出,它超越了认知范畴,将人文维度、关爱和学会如何学习纳入其中。这些领域对于培养能够在不同医疗环境中有效应用知识的护士至关重要。本文深入探讨了在护理教育中实施芬克分类法的益处和挑战,以及芬克分类法与护理专业不断发展的需求之间的兼容性。讨论与结论采用芬克分类法可以提高护理专业人员的能力、同理心和适应性,使他们更好地应对现代医疗挑战。要确定芬克分类法在培养护理技能和能力方面的功效,必须采用各种方法进行广泛研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信