{"title":"How I Do It: Process Control in Medical Student Experiences of Surgery","authors":"Lauren Hackney , Emmet Dorrian , Julie Scoffield , Stephen O'Neill","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Extreme variation exists in teaching and clinical exposure for medical students, both from specialty-to-specialty but also between universities. There is mounting literature highlighting the need to reform and standardize surgical education to allow for unified graduate competency. In line with the recommendations from the GMC and the Royal College of Surgeons England (RCSEng), Queens University Belfast (QUB) significantly revised their undergraduate medical programme. Within this new curriculum is the introduction of Specialty Focus week in Surgery. This report reviews the processes used in the introduction of this week.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>The initial week was formulated with a weekly timetable consisting of tutorials, bedside teaching and students following a peri-operative case. Run charts were populated with an alert when feedback dropped below a certain standard, which then triggered an intervention.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>Feedback was collected via a QR code from the first 200 surgical student.</p></div><div><h3>SETTINGS</h3><p>Belfast City Hospital in association with QUB undergraduate curriculum.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Run charts resulted in an alert when feedback dropped below 8/10. Following this we implemented smaller group bedside teaching. There was a significant improvement in feedback post intervention (p = 0.04) with no further alerts. Overall feedback had a nonsignificant feedback improvement post intervention (p = 0.07) with once again, no further alerts.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>This review has shown how we have provided some standardization of local surgical teaching, as well as having a process centered model of monitoring. This approach is easy to implement and could be reproduced elsewhere.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 11","pages":"Pages 1632-1636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004136/pdfft?md5=a069e43576e95145c3f06b752e5d8f1a&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424004136-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Extreme variation exists in teaching and clinical exposure for medical students, both from specialty-to-specialty but also between universities. There is mounting literature highlighting the need to reform and standardize surgical education to allow for unified graduate competency. In line with the recommendations from the GMC and the Royal College of Surgeons England (RCSEng), Queens University Belfast (QUB) significantly revised their undergraduate medical programme. Within this new curriculum is the introduction of Specialty Focus week in Surgery. This report reviews the processes used in the introduction of this week.
DESIGN
The initial week was formulated with a weekly timetable consisting of tutorials, bedside teaching and students following a peri-operative case. Run charts were populated with an alert when feedback dropped below a certain standard, which then triggered an intervention.
PARTICIPANTS
Feedback was collected via a QR code from the first 200 surgical student.
SETTINGS
Belfast City Hospital in association with QUB undergraduate curriculum.
RESULTS
Run charts resulted in an alert when feedback dropped below 8/10. Following this we implemented smaller group bedside teaching. There was a significant improvement in feedback post intervention (p = 0.04) with no further alerts. Overall feedback had a nonsignificant feedback improvement post intervention (p = 0.07) with once again, no further alerts.
CONCLUSION
This review has shown how we have provided some standardization of local surgical teaching, as well as having a process centered model of monitoring. This approach is easy to implement and could be reproduced elsewhere.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.