How I Do It: Process Control in Medical Student Experiences of Surgery

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"How I Do It: Process Control in Medical Student Experiences of Surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Extreme variation exists in teaching and clinical exposure for medical students, both from specialty-to-specialty but also between universities. There is mounting literature highlighting the need to reform and standardize surgical education to allow for unified graduate competency. In line with the recommendations from the GMC and the Royal College of Surgeons England (RCSEng), Queens University Belfast (QUB) significantly revised their undergraduate medical programme. Within this new curriculum is the introduction of Specialty Focus week in Surgery. This report reviews the processes used in the introduction of this week.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>The initial week was formulated with a weekly timetable consisting of tutorials, bedside teaching and students following a peri-operative case. Run charts were populated with an alert when feedback dropped below a certain standard, which then triggered an intervention.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>Feedback was collected via a QR code from the first 200 surgical student.</p></div><div><h3>SETTINGS</h3><p>Belfast City Hospital in association with QUB undergraduate curriculum.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Run charts resulted in an alert when feedback dropped below 8/10. Following this we implemented smaller group bedside teaching. There was a significant improvement in feedback post intervention (p = 0.04) with no further alerts. Overall feedback had a nonsignificant feedback improvement post intervention (p = 0.07) with once again, no further alerts.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>This review has shown how we have provided some standardization of local surgical teaching, as well as having a process centered model of monitoring. This approach is easy to implement and could be reproduced elsewhere.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004136/pdfft?md5=a069e43576e95145c3f06b752e5d8f1a&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424004136-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Extreme variation exists in teaching and clinical exposure for medical students, both from specialty-to-specialty but also between universities. There is mounting literature highlighting the need to reform and standardize surgical education to allow for unified graduate competency. In line with the recommendations from the GMC and the Royal College of Surgeons England (RCSEng), Queens University Belfast (QUB) significantly revised their undergraduate medical programme. Within this new curriculum is the introduction of Specialty Focus week in Surgery. This report reviews the processes used in the introduction of this week.

DESIGN

The initial week was formulated with a weekly timetable consisting of tutorials, bedside teaching and students following a peri-operative case. Run charts were populated with an alert when feedback dropped below a certain standard, which then triggered an intervention.

PARTICIPANTS

Feedback was collected via a QR code from the first 200 surgical student.

SETTINGS

Belfast City Hospital in association with QUB undergraduate curriculum.

RESULTS

Run charts resulted in an alert when feedback dropped below 8/10. Following this we implemented smaller group bedside teaching. There was a significant improvement in feedback post intervention (p = 0.04) with no further alerts. Overall feedback had a nonsignificant feedback improvement post intervention (p = 0.07) with once again, no further alerts.

CONCLUSION

This review has shown how we have provided some standardization of local surgical teaching, as well as having a process centered model of monitoring. This approach is easy to implement and could be reproduced elsewhere.

我是怎么做的:医学生体验外科手术的过程控制
目的医科学生的教学和临床经验存在极大差异,不仅存在于不同专业之间,也存在于不同大学之间。越来越多的文献强调,有必要改革外科教育并使之标准化,以便统一毕业生的能力。贝尔法斯特皇后大学(QUB)根据英国医疗管理委员会(GMC)和英国皇家外科学院(RCSEng)的建议,对其医学本科课程进行了重大修订。在新课程中引入了外科专业重点周。本报告回顾了在引入该周过程中使用的流程。设计最初的一周制定了每周时间表,包括辅导、床旁教学和学生跟进围手术期病例。当反馈意见低于一定标准时,运行图会发出警报,从而触发干预措施。参与者通过二维码收集前 200 名外科学生的反馈意见。结果当反馈意见低于 8/10 时,运行图会发出警报。随后,我们实施了小组床旁教学。干预后,反馈有了明显改善(p = 0.04),没有再发出警报。总体反馈在干预后有了不明显的改善(p = 0.07),同样没有再发出警报。这种方法易于实施,可在其他地方推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信