A case study of students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards BYOD and its use within their history classrooms

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David Chilton, Kim Wilson, Janet Dutton
{"title":"A case study of students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards BYOD and its use within their history classrooms","authors":"David Chilton, Kim Wilson, Janet Dutton","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-13006-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, laptop and ‘Bring Your Own Device’ (BYOD) programs have become an integral part of teaching and learning in many Australian schools. For history teachers, the presence of BYOD in the classroom potentially provides the opportunity to align two key teaching goals: historical research skills; and information, communication and technology (ICT) skills. However, there is a dearth of literature that focuses on BYOD for history teaching and learning. This paper reports on the findings of a case study examining Year 9 students’ (13-15-year-olds) and teachers’ attitudes towards the uses of BYOD in their history classes. The findings are from a larger study that examined the way that BYOD was being used for the teaching and learning of historical research skills online. This study uses reflexive thematic analysis to analyse student questionnaires where students reflected on their learning and attitudes. Teachers completed questionnaires and participated in semi-structured interviews. This study has found that the presence of BYOD has heightened an underlying constructivist approach to history teaching. Both students and teachers greatly value the access that BYOD provides for student-centred historical inquiry, as well as valuing BYOD as a perceived labour saver. However, participants seemed to underestimate the role that BYOD is playing in narrowing students’ understanding of history to facts about the past. Despite the limits of its small sample size, this case study has important implications for history educators, which are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13006-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, laptop and ‘Bring Your Own Device’ (BYOD) programs have become an integral part of teaching and learning in many Australian schools. For history teachers, the presence of BYOD in the classroom potentially provides the opportunity to align two key teaching goals: historical research skills; and information, communication and technology (ICT) skills. However, there is a dearth of literature that focuses on BYOD for history teaching and learning. This paper reports on the findings of a case study examining Year 9 students’ (13-15-year-olds) and teachers’ attitudes towards the uses of BYOD in their history classes. The findings are from a larger study that examined the way that BYOD was being used for the teaching and learning of historical research skills online. This study uses reflexive thematic analysis to analyse student questionnaires where students reflected on their learning and attitudes. Teachers completed questionnaires and participated in semi-structured interviews. This study has found that the presence of BYOD has heightened an underlying constructivist approach to history teaching. Both students and teachers greatly value the access that BYOD provides for student-centred historical inquiry, as well as valuing BYOD as a perceived labour saver. However, participants seemed to underestimate the role that BYOD is playing in narrowing students’ understanding of history to facts about the past. Despite the limits of its small sample size, this case study has important implications for history educators, which are discussed.

Abstract Image

关于学生和教师对 BYOD 及其在历史课堂中使用的态度的案例研究
近年来,笔记本电脑和 "自带设备"(BYOD)计划已成为澳大利亚许多学校教学中不可或缺的一部分。对于历史教师来说,BYOD 在课堂上的出现有可能为实现两个关键的教学目标提供机会:历史研究技能和信息、通信和技术(ICT)技能。然而,关注 BYOD 在历史教学中的应用的文献却十分匮乏。本文报告了一项案例研究的结果,该研究考察了九年级学生(13-15 岁)和教师对在历史课上使用 BYOD 的态度。这些研究结果来自一项规模更大的研究,该研究考察了 BYOD 在历史研究技能在线教学中的使用方式。本研究采用反思性主题分析法对学生问卷进行分析,学生在问卷中对自己的学习和态度进行了反思。教师填写了调查问卷,并参加了半结构式访谈。本研究发现,BYOD 的存在增强了历史教学中潜在的建构主义方法。学生和教师都非常重视 BYOD 为以学生为中心的历史探究提供的途径,并认为 BYOD 可以节省人力。然而,参与者似乎低估了 BYOD 在将学生对历史的理解缩小到过去的事实方面所起的作用。尽管样本量较小,但本案例研究对历史教育工作者有重要的启示,我们将对此进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信