Subjective discomfort and lack of volitional drive with neuroleptic pharmacotherapy - a phenomenological case study

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
L. Korošec Hudnik, I. Kosmačin
{"title":"Subjective discomfort and lack of volitional drive with neuroleptic pharmacotherapy - a phenomenological case study","authors":"L. Korošec Hudnik, I. Kosmačin","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>In comparison to extrapyramidal and metabolic side effects, the subjective aspects of neuroleptic treatment have been less extensively researched. Nevertheless, they are equally significant given their potential to influence adherence and functional outcome. Historically, terms such as “neuroleptic dysphoria,” “neuroleptic-induced psychic indifference,” and “neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome” were used to characterize a range of unpleasant mood states on the one hand and a documented and observable motivational deficit on the other. The latter aligns with the findings from preclinical neuroscientific studies and animal models highlighting the significant involvement of mesolimbic dopamine in motivational processes. Despite an abundance of anecdotal data these adverse effects are often undetectable in large-scale clinical studies that utilize standardized assessment measures.</p><span>Objectives</span><p>To present adverse subjective changes in arousal, mood and volitional drive resulting from neuroleptic intake from a patient’s perspective.</p><span>Methods</span><p>The subject is a patient, with no reported negative symptoms or lasting functional impairment described, who underwent a gradual 6-month discontinuation of risperidone in an outpatient setting following a complete recovery after a single psychotic episode. A semi-structured interview modelled after The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) was conducted. We aimed to elicit descriptions of the subjective experience while ensuring our approach remained non-suggestive.</p><span>Results</span><p>In addition to describing potential akathisia and lethargy at higher doses, the subject reported a significant lack of motivation and a notably reduced willingness to exert effort towards achieving specific goals or engaging in activities that he still found rewarding or pleasurable. Furthermore, he consistently noted gradual improvements across various psycho-social aspects following the discontinuation of the medication. These adverse and unpleasant experiences were presented as the primary reason for wanting to discontinue pharmacological treatment.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Certain adverse effects of antipsychotic medications can only be elucidated by the clinician through the examination of the patient’s subjective experiences. Medication induced dysphoria and volitional deficits have the potential to profoundly impact treatment adherence, leading to unrecommended discontinuation of neuroleptics, and can cause important functional impairment.</p><span>Disclosure of Interest</span><p>None Declared</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1729","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In comparison to extrapyramidal and metabolic side effects, the subjective aspects of neuroleptic treatment have been less extensively researched. Nevertheless, they are equally significant given their potential to influence adherence and functional outcome. Historically, terms such as “neuroleptic dysphoria,” “neuroleptic-induced psychic indifference,” and “neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome” were used to characterize a range of unpleasant mood states on the one hand and a documented and observable motivational deficit on the other. The latter aligns with the findings from preclinical neuroscientific studies and animal models highlighting the significant involvement of mesolimbic dopamine in motivational processes. Despite an abundance of anecdotal data these adverse effects are often undetectable in large-scale clinical studies that utilize standardized assessment measures.

Objectives

To present adverse subjective changes in arousal, mood and volitional drive resulting from neuroleptic intake from a patient’s perspective.

Methods

The subject is a patient, with no reported negative symptoms or lasting functional impairment described, who underwent a gradual 6-month discontinuation of risperidone in an outpatient setting following a complete recovery after a single psychotic episode. A semi-structured interview modelled after The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) was conducted. We aimed to elicit descriptions of the subjective experience while ensuring our approach remained non-suggestive.

Results

In addition to describing potential akathisia and lethargy at higher doses, the subject reported a significant lack of motivation and a notably reduced willingness to exert effort towards achieving specific goals or engaging in activities that he still found rewarding or pleasurable. Furthermore, he consistently noted gradual improvements across various psycho-social aspects following the discontinuation of the medication. These adverse and unpleasant experiences were presented as the primary reason for wanting to discontinue pharmacological treatment.

Conclusions

Certain adverse effects of antipsychotic medications can only be elucidated by the clinician through the examination of the patient’s subjective experiences. Medication induced dysphoria and volitional deficits have the potential to profoundly impact treatment adherence, leading to unrecommended discontinuation of neuroleptics, and can cause important functional impairment.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

神经安定药物治疗带来的主观不适和缺乏意志驱动力--一项现象学案例研究
导言:与锥体外系和代谢副作用相比,神经安定剂治疗的主观方面的研究较少。尽管如此,这些副作用同样重要,因为它们有可能影响患者的依从性和功能结果。从历史上看,"神经安定剂性焦虑症"、"神经安定剂诱发的精神淡漠 "和 "神经安定剂诱发的动力缺失综合征 "等术语一方面被用来描述一系列不愉快的情绪状态,另一方面也被用来描述有记录的、可观察到的动力缺失。后者与临床前神经科学研究和动物模型的研究结果一致,强调了间叶多巴胺在动机过程中的重要作用。尽管有大量的轶事数据,但在使用标准化评估方法进行的大规模临床研究中,这些不良反应往往无法被检测到。方法受试者是一名患者,没有任何负面症状或持久功能障碍的报告,在一次精神病发作后完全康复,在门诊环境中逐渐停用利培酮 6 个月。我们仿照阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS)的模式进行了一次半结构化访谈。结果除了描述高剂量时可能出现的自动症和嗜睡外,受试者还报告说他明显缺乏动力,并且明显不愿意努力实现特定目标或从事他仍然认为有意义或有乐趣的活动。此外,他一直注意到,在停药后,他的社会心理各方面逐渐得到改善。这些不良和不愉快的经历是他希望停止药物治疗的主要原因。药物引起的焦虑症和意志缺陷有可能对治疗的依从性产生深远影响,导致不建议患者停用神经安定药物,并可能造成重要的功能损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信