Freshness in Salmon by Hand-Held Devices: Methods in Feature Selection and Data Fusion for Spectroscopy

IF 2.6 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mike Hardy, Hossein Kashani Zadeh, Angelis Tzouchas, Fartash Vasefi, Nicholas MacKinnon, Gregory Bearman, Yaroslav Sokolov, Simon A. Haughey, Christopher T. Elliott
{"title":"Freshness in Salmon by Hand-Held Devices: Methods in Feature Selection and Data Fusion for Spectroscopy","authors":"Mike Hardy, Hossein Kashani Zadeh, Angelis Tzouchas, Fartash Vasefi, Nicholas MacKinnon, Gregory Bearman, Yaroslav Sokolov, Simon A. Haughey, Christopher T. Elliott","doi":"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Salmon fillet was analyzed via hand-held optical devices: fluorescence (@340 nm) and absorption spectroscopy across the visible and near-infrared (NIR) range (400–1900 nm). Spectroscopic measurements were benchmarked with nucleotide assays and potentiometry in an exploratory set of experiments over 11 days, with changes to spectral profiles noted. A second enlarged spectroscopic data set, over a 17 day period, was then acquired, and fillet freshness was classified ±1 day via four machine learning (ML) algorithms: linear discriminant analysis, Gaussian naïve, weighted <i>K</i>-nearest neighbors, and an ensemble bagged tree method. Dual-mode data fusion returned almost perfect accuracies (mean = 99.5 ± 0.51%), while single-mode ML analyses (fluorescence, visible absorbance, and NIR absorbance) returned lower mean accuracies at greater spread (77.1 ± 10.1%). Single-mode fluorescence accuracy was especially poor; however, via principal component analysis, we found that a truncated fluorescence data set of four variables (wavelengths) could predict “fresh” and “spoilt” salmon fillet based on a subtle peak redshift as the fillet aged, albeit marginally short of statistical significance (95% confidence ellipse). Thus, whether by feature selection of one spectral data set, or the combination of multiple data sets through different modes, this study lays the foundation for better determination of fish freshness within the context of rapid spectroscopic analyses.","PeriodicalId":72048,"journal":{"name":"ACS food science & technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS food science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salmon fillet was analyzed via hand-held optical devices: fluorescence (@340 nm) and absorption spectroscopy across the visible and near-infrared (NIR) range (400–1900 nm). Spectroscopic measurements were benchmarked with nucleotide assays and potentiometry in an exploratory set of experiments over 11 days, with changes to spectral profiles noted. A second enlarged spectroscopic data set, over a 17 day period, was then acquired, and fillet freshness was classified ±1 day via four machine learning (ML) algorithms: linear discriminant analysis, Gaussian naïve, weighted K-nearest neighbors, and an ensemble bagged tree method. Dual-mode data fusion returned almost perfect accuracies (mean = 99.5 ± 0.51%), while single-mode ML analyses (fluorescence, visible absorbance, and NIR absorbance) returned lower mean accuracies at greater spread (77.1 ± 10.1%). Single-mode fluorescence accuracy was especially poor; however, via principal component analysis, we found that a truncated fluorescence data set of four variables (wavelengths) could predict “fresh” and “spoilt” salmon fillet based on a subtle peak redshift as the fillet aged, albeit marginally short of statistical significance (95% confidence ellipse). Thus, whether by feature selection of one spectral data set, or the combination of multiple data sets through different modes, this study lays the foundation for better determination of fish freshness within the context of rapid spectroscopic analyses.

Abstract Image

用手持设备检测三文鱼的新鲜度:光谱学的特征选择和数据融合方法
鲑鱼片通过手持式光学设备进行分析:可见光和近红外(NIR)范围(400-1900 nm)内的荧光(@340 nm)和吸收光谱。在 11 天的探索性实验中,光谱测量结果与核苷酸测定法和电位测定法进行了比对,并记录了光谱曲线的变化。随后又获取了 17 天内的第二个扩大光谱数据集,并通过四种机器学习 (ML) 算法对鱼片新鲜度进行了±1 天的分类:线性判别分析、高斯天真法、加权 K 近邻法和集合袋装树法。双模式数据融合的准确率几乎完美(平均值 = 99.5 ± 0.51%),而单模式 ML 分析(荧光、可见光吸光度和近红外吸光度)的平均准确率较低,且差异较大(77.1 ± 10.1%)。单模式荧光的准确性尤其差;不过,通过主成分分析,我们发现由四个变量(波长)组成的截断荧光数据集可以根据鱼片老化过程中的细微峰值红移来预测 "新鲜 "和 "变质 "鲑鱼片,尽管在统计意义上略有不足(95% 置信椭圆)。因此,无论是通过对一个光谱数据集进行特征选择,还是通过不同模式对多个数据集进行组合,这项研究都为在快速光谱分析的背景下更好地确定鱼的新鲜度奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信