{"title":"The impact of powerful CFOs in M&A: evidence from U.S. acquisitions","authors":"Frederic Lammers, Ulrich Pape","doi":"10.1007/s11846-024-00803-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Practitioners and researchers have long been interested in gaining a better understanding of the factors driving Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) outcomes. While studies are increasingly adopting an upper-echelons perspective in this regard, the role of individual decision-makers, other than the chief executive officer, remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigate how acquiring companies’ chief financial officers (CFOs), who possess greater managerial power to influence crucial decisions in the acquisition process, can affect M&A outcomes. We expect greater decision authority to enable CFOs to contribute valuable financial expertise at different stages of a deal, ultimately enhancing the takeover’s overall value creation. Utilizing a large sample of U.S. transactions that occurred from 1996 to 2018, our results suggest that more powerful CFOs improve M&A performance in large deals where shareholders presume CFO financial expertise will be especially valuable. Further analyses of specific mechanisms through which CFOs improve M&A outcomes reveal the importance of distinguishing between the multiple dimensions through which CFOs gain influence in a firm. In this context, we find that CFOs' M&A experience (i.e., their expertise power) is the most persistent dimension of improved deal outcomes, as reduced takeover premiums and lower third-party advisory fees make clear.</p>","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00803-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Practitioners and researchers have long been interested in gaining a better understanding of the factors driving Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) outcomes. While studies are increasingly adopting an upper-echelons perspective in this regard, the role of individual decision-makers, other than the chief executive officer, remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigate how acquiring companies’ chief financial officers (CFOs), who possess greater managerial power to influence crucial decisions in the acquisition process, can affect M&A outcomes. We expect greater decision authority to enable CFOs to contribute valuable financial expertise at different stages of a deal, ultimately enhancing the takeover’s overall value creation. Utilizing a large sample of U.S. transactions that occurred from 1996 to 2018, our results suggest that more powerful CFOs improve M&A performance in large deals where shareholders presume CFO financial expertise will be especially valuable. Further analyses of specific mechanisms through which CFOs improve M&A outcomes reveal the importance of distinguishing between the multiple dimensions through which CFOs gain influence in a firm. In this context, we find that CFOs' M&A experience (i.e., their expertise power) is the most persistent dimension of improved deal outcomes, as reduced takeover premiums and lower third-party advisory fees make clear.
期刊介绍:
Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.