Jelena Jovanović, Andrew Zamecnik, Abhinava Barthakur, Shane Dawson
{"title":"Curriculum analytics: Exploring assessment objectives, types, and grades in a study program","authors":"Jelena Jovanović, Andrew Zamecnik, Abhinava Barthakur, Shane Dawson","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-13015-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Higher education institutions are increasingly seeking ways to leverage the available educational data to make program and course quality improvements. The development of automated curriculum analytics can play a substantial role in this effort by bringing novel and timely insights into course and program quality. However, the adoption of curriculum analytics for program quality assurance has been impeded by a lack of accessible and scalable data-informed methods that can be employed to evaluate assessment practices and ensure their alignment with the curriculum objectives. Presently, this work remains a manual and resource intensive endeavour. In response to this challenge, we present an exploratory curriculum analytics approach that allows for scalable, semi-automated examination of the alignment between assessments and learning objectives at the program level. The method employs a comprehensive representation of assessment objectives (i.e., learning objectives associated with assessments), to encode the domain specific and general knowledge, as well as the specific skills the implemented assessments are designed to measure. The proposed method uses this representation for clustering assessment objectives within a study program, and proceeds with an exploratory analysis of the resulting clusters of objectives in relation to the corresponding assessment types and student assessment grades. We demonstrate and discuss the capacity of the proposed method to offer an initial insight into alignment of assessment objectives and practice, using the assessment-related data from an undergraduate study program in information systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13015-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Higher education institutions are increasingly seeking ways to leverage the available educational data to make program and course quality improvements. The development of automated curriculum analytics can play a substantial role in this effort by bringing novel and timely insights into course and program quality. However, the adoption of curriculum analytics for program quality assurance has been impeded by a lack of accessible and scalable data-informed methods that can be employed to evaluate assessment practices and ensure their alignment with the curriculum objectives. Presently, this work remains a manual and resource intensive endeavour. In response to this challenge, we present an exploratory curriculum analytics approach that allows for scalable, semi-automated examination of the alignment between assessments and learning objectives at the program level. The method employs a comprehensive representation of assessment objectives (i.e., learning objectives associated with assessments), to encode the domain specific and general knowledge, as well as the specific skills the implemented assessments are designed to measure. The proposed method uses this representation for clustering assessment objectives within a study program, and proceeds with an exploratory analysis of the resulting clusters of objectives in relation to the corresponding assessment types and student assessment grades. We demonstrate and discuss the capacity of the proposed method to offer an initial insight into alignment of assessment objectives and practice, using the assessment-related data from an undergraduate study program in information systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments.
The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts. The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.