Prognostic frailty-based determinants of long-term mortality in older patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Fiammetta Monacelli, Alessio Nencioni, Michele Cea, Mariya Muzyka, Silvia Ottaviani, Alessio Signori, Luca Tagliafico, Andrea Casabella, Irene Caffa, Marta Ponzano, Cristina Marelli, Roberto Lemoli, Tommaso Bonfiglio, Erica Parisi, Ana Guijarro
{"title":"Prognostic frailty-based determinants of long-term mortality in older patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma","authors":"Fiammetta Monacelli, Alessio Nencioni, Michele Cea, Mariya Muzyka, Silvia Ottaviani, Alessio Signori, Luca Tagliafico, Andrea Casabella, Irene Caffa, Marta Ponzano, Cristina Marelli, Roberto Lemoli, Tommaso Bonfiglio, Erica Parisi, Ana Guijarro","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.15.24312039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm predominantly diagnosed in older adults. However, the significance of defining patient frailty, as well as identifying the most suitable and reliable tools for its assessment, remains to be firmly established.\nMaterials and Methods: This retrospective observational study investigated 36 patients, aged 65 or older, who underwent Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). The average patient age was 76 (SD 6.22), with 33.3% being female. Patients were evaluated using the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG-FI) and the 40-item Rockwood’s Frailty Index (FI) at the Oncogeriatrics clinic of the IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy, between December 2017 and August 2021. Laboratory, cancer-specific, demographic, and clinical variables were collected. Survival analysis and frailty comparison were conducted using Stata version 17.0.\nResults: Stepwise multivariate analysis identified Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.09-1.78, p=0.008) and Rockwood’s Frailty Index (FI) (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.29-3.87, p=0.004) as significant prognostic predictors, adjusted for sex, ISS stage, and multimorbility. Comparison between Rockwood’s FI and IMWG-FI using Spearman correlation coefficient showed no statistically significant correlation (r=0.268, p=0.114). Multivariate Cox model, adjusting for sex, International Staging System (ISS) stage, and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) comorbidity index, demonstrated the superior predictive ability of Rockwood’s FI over IMWG-FI (C-index 0.775 vs 0.749).\nDiscussion: the 40-item Rockwood FI emerges as a valuable tool for prognostication in old MM patients, surpassing the traditional IMWG-FI in predictive accuracy, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach considering both disease-specific and patient-related factors.","PeriodicalId":501025,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.15.24312039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm predominantly diagnosed in older adults. However, the significance of defining patient frailty, as well as identifying the most suitable and reliable tools for its assessment, remains to be firmly established. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study investigated 36 patients, aged 65 or older, who underwent Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). The average patient age was 76 (SD 6.22), with 33.3% being female. Patients were evaluated using the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG-FI) and the 40-item Rockwood’s Frailty Index (FI) at the Oncogeriatrics clinic of the IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy, between December 2017 and August 2021. Laboratory, cancer-specific, demographic, and clinical variables were collected. Survival analysis and frailty comparison were conducted using Stata version 17.0. Results: Stepwise multivariate analysis identified Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.09-1.78, p=0.008) and Rockwood’s Frailty Index (FI) (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.29-3.87, p=0.004) as significant prognostic predictors, adjusted for sex, ISS stage, and multimorbility. Comparison between Rockwood’s FI and IMWG-FI using Spearman correlation coefficient showed no statistically significant correlation (r=0.268, p=0.114). Multivariate Cox model, adjusting for sex, International Staging System (ISS) stage, and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) comorbidity index, demonstrated the superior predictive ability of Rockwood’s FI over IMWG-FI (C-index 0.775 vs 0.749). Discussion: the 40-item Rockwood FI emerges as a valuable tool for prognostication in old MM patients, surpassing the traditional IMWG-FI in predictive accuracy, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach considering both disease-specific and patient-related factors.
新诊断多发性骨髓瘤老年患者长期死亡率的预后脆弱性决定因素
导言:多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种浆细胞肿瘤,主要在老年人中确诊。然而,界定患者虚弱程度的意义以及确定最合适、最可靠的评估工具仍有待进一步确定:这项回顾性观察研究调查了 36 名 65 岁或以上的患者,他们都接受了老年病综合评估(CGA)。患者平均年龄为 76 岁(SD 6.22),33.3% 为女性。2017年12月至2021年8月期间,患者在意大利热那亚IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino医院肿瘤老年病诊所接受了国际骨髓瘤工作组虚弱指数(IMWG-FI)和40项洛克伍德虚弱指数(FI)评估。研究人员收集了实验室、癌症特异性、人口统计学和临床变量。使用Stata 17.0版本进行生存分析和虚弱程度比较:经性别、ISS分期和多病状态调整后,逐步多变量分析发现,数值评定量表(NRS)(HR 1.40,95% CI 1.09-1.78,p=0.008)和罗克伍德虚弱指数(FI)(HR 2.23,95% CI 1.29-3.87,p=0.004)是重要的预后预测因素。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数对洛克伍德 FI 和 IMWG-FI 进行比较后发现,两者之间没有统计学意义上的显著相关性(r=0.268,p=0.114)。多变量 Cox 模型对性别、国际分期系统(ISS)分期和累积疾病评定量表(CIRS)合并症指数进行了调整,结果显示 Rockwood FI 的预测能力优于 IMWG-FI(C 指数为 0.775 vs 0.749)。讨论:40 个项目的 Rockwood FI 成为老年 MM 患者预后预测的重要工具,其预测准确性超过了传统的 IMWG-FI,强调了综合考虑疾病特异性和患者相关因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信