Robust and multiresolution sparse processing particle image velocimetry for improvement in spatial resolution

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Chihaya Abe, Naoki Kanda, Kumi Nakai, Taku Nonomura
{"title":"Robust and multiresolution sparse processing particle image velocimetry for improvement in spatial resolution","authors":"Chihaya Abe, Naoki Kanda, Kumi Nakai, Taku Nonomura","doi":"10.1007/s12650-024-01016-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, robustness of sparse processing particle image velocimetry (SPPIV) of high spatial resolution was improved, and the flow velocity field was measured in real time by improved SPPIV, whereas SPPIV estimates the entire flow field from limited results of sparsely located PIV analysis interrogation windows in real time but suffers from estimating high spatial resolution field because of outliers appearing in the cross correlation analysis. The high-resolution velocity field estimation was conducted by reducing the interrogation window size from <span>\\(32\\times 32\\;\\text {pixel}^2\\)</span> to <span>\\(16\\times 16\\)</span> and <span>\\(8 \\times 8\\;\\text {pixel}^2\\)</span>, and the robustness of the improved SPPIV was investigated. We developed two methods of high-resolution SPPIV which is capable of real-time flow field measurement. One is robust SPPIV which incorporates with robust Kalman filter and eliminates the outliers, while the other is multiresolution SPPIV which adopts the large interrogation area for real-time measurements and projects it into the high-resolution velocity fields. Robust and multiresolution SPPIV can estimate the velocity fields more accurately than high-resolution standard SPPIV with <span>\\(16 \\times 16\\)</span> or <span>\\(8 \\times 8\\;\\text {pixel}^2\\)</span> interrogation windows. The detailed discussion and comparison of those two methods are conducted. In addition, the sensor optimization is compared in the present framework and it shows that the sensors optimized by the Kalman filter index are better than those by the snapshot-to-snapshot index for SPPIV application.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":54756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visualization","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-024-01016-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, robustness of sparse processing particle image velocimetry (SPPIV) of high spatial resolution was improved, and the flow velocity field was measured in real time by improved SPPIV, whereas SPPIV estimates the entire flow field from limited results of sparsely located PIV analysis interrogation windows in real time but suffers from estimating high spatial resolution field because of outliers appearing in the cross correlation analysis. The high-resolution velocity field estimation was conducted by reducing the interrogation window size from \(32\times 32\;\text {pixel}^2\) to \(16\times 16\) and \(8 \times 8\;\text {pixel}^2\), and the robustness of the improved SPPIV was investigated. We developed two methods of high-resolution SPPIV which is capable of real-time flow field measurement. One is robust SPPIV which incorporates with robust Kalman filter and eliminates the outliers, while the other is multiresolution SPPIV which adopts the large interrogation area for real-time measurements and projects it into the high-resolution velocity fields. Robust and multiresolution SPPIV can estimate the velocity fields more accurately than high-resolution standard SPPIV with \(16 \times 16\) or \(8 \times 8\;\text {pixel}^2\) interrogation windows. The detailed discussion and comparison of those two methods are conducted. In addition, the sensor optimization is compared in the present framework and it shows that the sensors optimized by the Kalman filter index are better than those by the snapshot-to-snapshot index for SPPIV application.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

提高空间分辨率的稳健多分辨率稀疏处理粒子图像测速仪
本研究提高了高空间分辨率稀疏处理粒子图像测速仪(SPPIV)的鲁棒性,并通过改进的SPPIV实时测量了流速场,而SPPIV是通过实时稀疏定位PIV分析询问窗口的有限结果估算整个流场,但由于交叉相关分析中出现的异常值,在估算高空间分辨率场时受到影响。通过将询问窗口大小从(32乘以32)减小到(16乘以16)和(8乘以8)来进行高分辨率速度场估计,并研究了改进后的SPPIV的鲁棒性。我们开发了两种能够实时测量流场的高分辨率 SPPIV 方法。一种是鲁棒 SPPIV,它结合了鲁棒卡尔曼滤波器并消除了异常值;另一种是多分辨率 SPPIV,它采用了实时测量的大探测区域并将其投射到高分辨率速度场中。与高分辨率标准SPPIV相比,鲁棒和多分辨率SPPIV能更精确地估计速度场,其询问窗口为(16乘以16)或(8乘以8;文本{像素}^2)。对这两种方法进行了详细的讨论和比较。此外,还对本框架下的传感器优化进行了比较,结果表明,在SPPIV应用中,采用卡尔曼滤波指标优化的传感器优于采用快照到快照指标优化的传感器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Visualization
Journal of Visualization COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Visualization is an interdisciplinary imaging science devoted to making the invisible visible through the techniques of experimental visualization and computer-aided visualization. The scope of the Journal is to provide a place to exchange information on the latest visualization technology and its application by the presentation of latest papers of both researchers and technicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信