The Developmental Collision Hypothesis: An Empirical Test With Three Generations of Sexual Minority Youth

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Meg D. Bishop, Jessica N. Fish, Stephen T. Russell
{"title":"The Developmental Collision Hypothesis: An Empirical Test With Three Generations of Sexual Minority Youth","authors":"Meg D. Bishop, Jessica N. Fish, Stephen T. Russell","doi":"10.1007/s10964-024-02075-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sexual minority youth experience disproportionate rates of mental health symptomatology relative to their heterosexual peers. Less is known about why these disparities have persisted despite growing public awareness of sexual diversity. The <i>developmental collision hypothesis</i> states that increased cultural visibility of sexual diversity has accelerated the developmental timing of sexual minority identity formation processes such that they collide with early adolescence, a uniquely sensitive period for experiencing identity-based stigma and associated mental health vulnerability. To test this hypothesis, levels and relations between ages of sexual minority identity development milestones, frequency of LGBT-related victimization, and depressive symptoms were examined across three age-matched but cohort-distinct samples of sexual minority adolescents. Data come from three secondary datasets of sexual minority youth who were adolescents in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s, respectively: the Challenges and Coping Study, the Victimization and Mental Health among High Risk Youths Study, and the Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide among Sexual Minority Youth Study (<i>n</i> = 1312; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 17.34, SD = 1.30; 52% female). Adolescents from more recent cohorts reported earlier mean ages of several milestones but similar frequencies of LGBT-related victimization relative to those from less recent cohorts. Path analysis models showed that earlier milestones were associated indirectly with more depressive symptoms through LGBT-related victimization. Notably, earlier ages of self-identification and disclosure of a sexual minority identity were also directly related to less depressive symptoms. Few generational differences in relations between constructs emerged. Findings garner initial support for the developmental collision hypothesis and suggest that LGBT-related victimization, rather than earlier milestones themselves, increases mental health vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-02075-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual minority youth experience disproportionate rates of mental health symptomatology relative to their heterosexual peers. Less is known about why these disparities have persisted despite growing public awareness of sexual diversity. The developmental collision hypothesis states that increased cultural visibility of sexual diversity has accelerated the developmental timing of sexual minority identity formation processes such that they collide with early adolescence, a uniquely sensitive period for experiencing identity-based stigma and associated mental health vulnerability. To test this hypothesis, levels and relations between ages of sexual minority identity development milestones, frequency of LGBT-related victimization, and depressive symptoms were examined across three age-matched but cohort-distinct samples of sexual minority adolescents. Data come from three secondary datasets of sexual minority youth who were adolescents in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s, respectively: the Challenges and Coping Study, the Victimization and Mental Health among High Risk Youths Study, and the Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide among Sexual Minority Youth Study (n = 1312; Mage = 17.34, SD = 1.30; 52% female). Adolescents from more recent cohorts reported earlier mean ages of several milestones but similar frequencies of LGBT-related victimization relative to those from less recent cohorts. Path analysis models showed that earlier milestones were associated indirectly with more depressive symptoms through LGBT-related victimization. Notably, earlier ages of self-identification and disclosure of a sexual minority identity were also directly related to less depressive symptoms. Few generational differences in relations between constructs emerged. Findings garner initial support for the developmental collision hypothesis and suggest that LGBT-related victimization, rather than earlier milestones themselves, increases mental health vulnerability.

Abstract Image

发展碰撞假说:对三代性少数群体青少年的实证检验
与异性恋同龄人相比,性少数群体青少年的心理健康症状发生率过高。尽管公众对性多样性的认识不断提高,但对这些差异为何持续存在却知之甚少。发展碰撞假说认为,性多样性文化能见度的提高加速了性少数群体身份形成过程的发展时间,使其与青春期早期发生碰撞,而青春期早期是经历身份污名和相关心理健康脆弱性的独特敏感期。为了验证这一假设,我们在三个年龄匹配但队列不同的性少数群体青少年样本中,研究了性少数群体身份发展里程碑的年龄、与 LGBT 相关的受害频率以及抑郁症状之间的水平和关系。数据分别来自 1990 年代、2000 年代和 2010 年代性少数群体青少年的三个二手数据集:《挑战与应对研究》、《高风险青少年受害与心理健康研究》和《性少数群体青少年自杀风险与保护因素研究》(n = 1312;Mage = 17.34,SD = 1.30;52% 为女性)。与较新队列的青少年相比,较新队列的青少年报告的几个里程碑的平均年龄较早,但与 LGBT 相关的受害频率相似。路径分析模型显示,较早的里程碑与更多的抑郁症状间接相关,因为他们受到了与 LGBT 相关的伤害。值得注意的是,较早自我认同和披露性少数群体身份的年龄也与较少抑郁症状直接相关。各构念之间的关系很少出现代际差异。研究结果为发展碰撞假说提供了初步支持,并表明与 LGBT 相关的受害行为,而不是较早的里程碑本身,会增加心理健康的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信