Motoric cognitive risk syndrome as a predictive factor of cognitive impairment and dementia – A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 12.5 1区 医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
Nicholas E.-Kai Lim , Brian Sheng Yep Yeo , Rachel Siying Lee , Jun Xiang Lim , Yiong Huak Chan , Nagaendran Kandiah , Roger Ho , Cyrus Su Hui Ho , Jean Woo , Hidenori Arai , Reshma Aziz Merchant
{"title":"Motoric cognitive risk syndrome as a predictive factor of cognitive impairment and dementia – A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nicholas E.-Kai Lim ,&nbsp;Brian Sheng Yep Yeo ,&nbsp;Rachel Siying Lee ,&nbsp;Jun Xiang Lim ,&nbsp;Yiong Huak Chan ,&nbsp;Nagaendran Kandiah ,&nbsp;Roger Ho ,&nbsp;Cyrus Su Hui Ho ,&nbsp;Jean Woo ,&nbsp;Hidenori Arai ,&nbsp;Reshma Aziz Merchant","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is defined as the presence of slow gait-speed and subjective cognitive decline in older individuals without mobility disability or dementia. While some studies suggest that MCR is a pre-dementia syndrome and may help predict the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, not all studies concur. The objective of this study is to comprehensively summarize and synthesize evidence to assess the association between MCR and cognitive impairment and dementia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following a pre-specified protocol, two authors systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library from inception to 19 August 2024 for observational or randomized studies pertaining to the association between MCR and cognitive impairment and dementia. We favoured maximally adjusted hazards and odds ratios to determine the longitudinal and cross-sectional risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. We investigated for potential sources of heterogeneity and also conducted sensitivity and subgroup analyses by continent and the type of cognitive outcome. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 20 studies comprising a combined cohort of 1206,782 participants, of which 17 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled analysis outlined that individuals with MCR exhibited 2.20-fold higher risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, compared to controls (RR=2.20; 95 %CI=1.91–2.53). These findings remained robust across all subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and assessments of publication bias.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MCR may be considered a predictive factor for long-term cognitive impairment and dementia. This should be taken into consideration when clinically evaluating the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia but further research is required to lend greater clarity to this association.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55545,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Research Reviews","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102470"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724002885","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is defined as the presence of slow gait-speed and subjective cognitive decline in older individuals without mobility disability or dementia. While some studies suggest that MCR is a pre-dementia syndrome and may help predict the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, not all studies concur. The objective of this study is to comprehensively summarize and synthesize evidence to assess the association between MCR and cognitive impairment and dementia.

Methods

Following a pre-specified protocol, two authors systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library from inception to 19 August 2024 for observational or randomized studies pertaining to the association between MCR and cognitive impairment and dementia. We favoured maximally adjusted hazards and odds ratios to determine the longitudinal and cross-sectional risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. We investigated for potential sources of heterogeneity and also conducted sensitivity and subgroup analyses by continent and the type of cognitive outcome. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

Results

We included 20 studies comprising a combined cohort of 1206,782 participants, of which 17 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled analysis outlined that individuals with MCR exhibited 2.20-fold higher risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, compared to controls (RR=2.20; 95 %CI=1.91–2.53). These findings remained robust across all subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and assessments of publication bias.

Conclusion

MCR may be considered a predictive factor for long-term cognitive impairment and dementia. This should be taken into consideration when clinically evaluating the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia but further research is required to lend greater clarity to this association.

运动性认知风险综合征是认知障碍和痴呆症的预测因素--系统回顾和元分析。
背景:运动性认知风险综合征(MCR)是指没有行动障碍或痴呆症的老年人出现步速缓慢和主观认知能力下降。一些研究表明,运动认知风险综合征是痴呆症的前期综合征,可能有助于预测认知障碍和痴呆症的风险,但并非所有研究都同意这一观点。本研究旨在全面总结和归纳证据,以评估 MCR 与认知障碍和痴呆之间的关联:按照预先指定的方案,两位作者系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆从开始到 2024 年 8 月 19 日有关 MCR 与认知障碍和痴呆症之间关系的观察性或随机研究。我们倾向于采用最大调整危险度和几率比来确定认知障碍和痴呆症的纵向和横向风险。我们对潜在的异质性来源进行了调查,并按大陆和认知结果类型进行了敏感性和亚组分析。证据质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)框架进行评估:我们纳入了 20 项研究,包括 1,206,782 名参与者,其中 17 项研究纳入了定量分析。汇总分析结果表明,与对照组相比,MCR 患者发生认知障碍和痴呆症的风险高出 2.20 倍(RR=2.20;95%CI=1.91-2.53)。这些结果在所有亚组分析、敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估中都保持稳定:MCR可被视为长期认知障碍和痴呆症的预测因素。在临床评估认知功能障碍和痴呆症风险时应考虑到这一点,但还需要进一步的研究来进一步明确这种关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ageing Research Reviews
Ageing Research Reviews 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: With the rise in average human life expectancy, the impact of ageing and age-related diseases on our society has become increasingly significant. Ageing research is now a focal point for numerous laboratories, encompassing leaders in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and behavior. Ageing Research Reviews (ARR) serves as a cornerstone in this field, addressing emerging trends. ARR aims to fill a substantial gap by providing critical reviews and viewpoints on evolving discoveries concerning the mechanisms of ageing and age-related diseases. The rapid progress in understanding the mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival is unveiling new insights into the regulation of ageing. From telomerase to stem cells, and from energy to oxyradical metabolism, we are witnessing an exciting era in the multidisciplinary field of ageing research. The journal explores the cellular and molecular foundations of interventions that extend lifespan, such as caloric restriction. It identifies the underpinnings of manipulations that extend lifespan, shedding light on novel approaches for preventing age-related diseases. ARR publishes articles on focused topics selected from the expansive field of ageing research, with a particular emphasis on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the aging process. This includes age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders. The journal also covers applications of basic ageing research to lifespan extension and disease prevention, offering a comprehensive platform for advancing our understanding of this critical field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信