Using Multi-Layer Perceptron Driven Diagnosis to Compare Biomarkers for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Nicholas Riina, Alon Harris, Brent A Siesky, Lukas Ritzer, Louis R Pasquale, James C Tsai, James Keller, Barbara Wirostko, Julia Arciero, Brendan Fry, George Eckert, Alice Verticchio Vercellin, Gal Antman, Paul A Sidoti, Giovanna Guidoboni
{"title":"Using Multi-Layer Perceptron Driven Diagnosis to Compare Biomarkers for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.","authors":"Nicholas Riina, Alon Harris, Brent A Siesky, Lukas Ritzer, Louis R Pasquale, James C Tsai, James Keller, Barbara Wirostko, Julia Arciero, Brendan Fry, George Eckert, Alice Verticchio Vercellin, Gal Antman, Paul A Sidoti, Giovanna Guidoboni","doi":"10.1167/iovs.65.11.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To use neural network machine learning (ML) models to identify the most relevant ocular biomarkers for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neural network models, also known as multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), were trained on a prospectively collected observational dataset comprised of 93 glaucoma patients confirmed by a glaucoma specialist and 113 control subjects. The base model used only intraocular pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and visual field (VF) parameters to diagnose glaucoma. The following models were given the base parameters in addition to one of the following biomarkers: structural features (optic nerve parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell complex [GCC] and macular thickness), choroidal thickness, and RNFL and GCC thickness only, by optical coherence tomography (OCT); and vascular features by OCT angiography (OCTA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MLPs of three different structures were evaluated with tenfold cross validation. The testing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the models were compared with independent samples t-tests. The vascular and structural models both had significantly higher accuracies than the base model, with the hemodynamic AUC (0.819) insignificantly outperforming the structural set AUC (0.816). The GCC + RNFL model and the model containing all structural and vascular features were also significantly more accurate than the base model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neural network models indicate that OCTA optic nerve head vascular biomarkers are equally useful for ML diagnosis of POAG when compared to OCT structural biomarker features alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.65.11.16","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To use neural network machine learning (ML) models to identify the most relevant ocular biomarkers for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: Neural network models, also known as multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), were trained on a prospectively collected observational dataset comprised of 93 glaucoma patients confirmed by a glaucoma specialist and 113 control subjects. The base model used only intraocular pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and visual field (VF) parameters to diagnose glaucoma. The following models were given the base parameters in addition to one of the following biomarkers: structural features (optic nerve parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell complex [GCC] and macular thickness), choroidal thickness, and RNFL and GCC thickness only, by optical coherence tomography (OCT); and vascular features by OCT angiography (OCTA).

Results: MLPs of three different structures were evaluated with tenfold cross validation. The testing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the models were compared with independent samples t-tests. The vascular and structural models both had significantly higher accuracies than the base model, with the hemodynamic AUC (0.819) insignificantly outperforming the structural set AUC (0.816). The GCC + RNFL model and the model containing all structural and vascular features were also significantly more accurate than the base model.

Conclusions: Neural network models indicate that OCTA optic nerve head vascular biomarkers are equally useful for ML diagnosis of POAG when compared to OCT structural biomarker features alone.

利用多层感知器驱动诊断比较原发性开角型青光眼的生物标记物。
目的:利用神经网络机器学习(ML)模型确定与诊断原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)最相关的眼部生物标志物:神经网络模型(又称多层感知器(MLP))在前瞻性收集的观察数据集上进行训练,该数据集由青光眼专家确诊的93名青光眼患者和113名对照组受试者组成。基础模型仅使用眼压、血压、心率和视野(VF)参数来诊断青光眼。以下模型在基本参数的基础上增加了以下一种生物标志物:结构特征(视神经参数、视网膜神经纤维层[RNFL]、神经节细胞复合体[GCC]和黄斑厚度)、脉络膜厚度、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检测的仅有 RNFL 和 GCC 厚度;以及 OCT 血管造影(OCTA)检测的血管特征:通过十倍交叉验证对三种不同结构的 MLP 进行了评估。通过独立样本 t 检验比较了模型的接收器工作特征曲线下的测试面积(AUC)。血管模型和结构模型的准确度都明显高于基础模型,其中血液动力学 AUC(0.819)明显优于结构集 AUC(0.816)。GCC + RNFL 模型和包含所有结构和血管特征的模型的准确度也明显高于基础模型:神经网络模型表明,与单独的 OCT 结构生物标志物特征相比,OCTA 视神经头血管生物标志物对 POAG 的 ML 诊断同样有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信