Worksheet-Based Delivery System to Improve Participation and Engagement in Basic Science

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jocelyn Powell DO , Stephanie Chairs C-TAGME , Christopher R. D'Adamo PhD , Joshua Wolf MD, FACS, FASCRS , Marcie Feinman MD, MEHP, FACS
{"title":"Worksheet-Based Delivery System to Improve Participation and Engagement in Basic Science","authors":"Jocelyn Powell DO ,&nbsp;Stephanie Chairs C-TAGME ,&nbsp;Christopher R. D'Adamo PhD ,&nbsp;Joshua Wolf MD, FACS, FASCRS ,&nbsp;Marcie Feinman MD, MEHP, FACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>THE CHALLENGE</h3><p>A basic science curriculum is foundational to surgical training. However, engagement in, and satisfaction with, standard lectures is notoriously poor and antithetical to adult education principles.</p></div><div><h3>THE TOOL</h3><p>We developed a worksheet-based delivery system to improve participation and engagement in basic science.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>The SCORE curriculum objectives were used to create interactive worksheets that could be filled out in advance and were reviewed as a group during protected education time. All PGY levels in our community-based academically affiliated program participated (19 residents total). The worksheets were created by a resident in her research year and vetted by the attending moderating each session. The same amount of time allotted for our former basic science lectures was used for worksheet review as a group. The frequency of active resident participation was recorded before and after implementing the worksheet-based curriculum. A survey was created to determine resident satisfaction with the curriculum and was sent out before and after the implementation of the new curriculum. Mean resident survey scores with lecture-based and worksheet-based curriculum were compared utilizing paired t-tests.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Fourteen residents responded to the survey. With the lecture-based format, active participation was noted 30% of the time or less. With the worksheet-based format, engagement increased to 100% of the time. Additionally, there was a statistically significant increase in the resident opinion of the utility of the sessions, congruence with their learning style, and improvement in knowledge. About 64% of the residents who completed the survey either “always” or “sometimes” completed the worksheets ahead of time and 92% of the residents who completed the worksheets ahead of time felt like it allowed them to increase their engagement in didactics.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Engagement is a core tenet of adult education and changing from lectures to worksheets in the delivery of basic science capitalizes on this concept, leading to increased resident satisfaction. This initiative is easily translatable to any type of residency program and can be completed within the currently allotted timeframe for the basic science conference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 11","pages":"Pages 1558-1564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424003507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

THE CHALLENGE

A basic science curriculum is foundational to surgical training. However, engagement in, and satisfaction with, standard lectures is notoriously poor and antithetical to adult education principles.

THE TOOL

We developed a worksheet-based delivery system to improve participation and engagement in basic science.

METHODS

The SCORE curriculum objectives were used to create interactive worksheets that could be filled out in advance and were reviewed as a group during protected education time. All PGY levels in our community-based academically affiliated program participated (19 residents total). The worksheets were created by a resident in her research year and vetted by the attending moderating each session. The same amount of time allotted for our former basic science lectures was used for worksheet review as a group. The frequency of active resident participation was recorded before and after implementing the worksheet-based curriculum. A survey was created to determine resident satisfaction with the curriculum and was sent out before and after the implementation of the new curriculum. Mean resident survey scores with lecture-based and worksheet-based curriculum were compared utilizing paired t-tests.

RESULTS

Fourteen residents responded to the survey. With the lecture-based format, active participation was noted 30% of the time or less. With the worksheet-based format, engagement increased to 100% of the time. Additionally, there was a statistically significant increase in the resident opinion of the utility of the sessions, congruence with their learning style, and improvement in knowledge. About 64% of the residents who completed the survey either “always” or “sometimes” completed the worksheets ahead of time and 92% of the residents who completed the worksheets ahead of time felt like it allowed them to increase their engagement in didactics.

CONCLUSIONS

Engagement is a core tenet of adult education and changing from lectures to worksheets in the delivery of basic science capitalizes on this concept, leading to increased resident satisfaction. This initiative is easily translatable to any type of residency program and can be completed within the currently allotted timeframe for the basic science conference.

基于工作表的交付系统,提高基础科学的参与度和投入度
挑战基础科学课程是外科培训的基础。工具我们开发了一种基于工作表的授课系统,以提高基础科学课程的参与度。方法使用 SCORE 课程目标创建互动工作表,这些工作表可以提前填写,并在受保护的教育时间内进行集体复习。我们社区学术附属项目的所有 PGY 级别的住院医师(共 19 名)均参与了此次活动。工作表由一名研究年级的住院医师制作,并由主持每节课的主治医师审核。我们将以前基础科学讲座的时间分配给了工作表小组审查。在实施基于工作表的课程前后,我们记录了住院医生积极参与的频率。为确定住院医师对课程的满意度,我们制作了一份调查问卷,并在新课程实施前后进行了发放。通过配对 t 检验比较了住院医师对以讲座为基础的课程和以工作表为基础的课程的平均调查得分。在以讲座为基础的课程中,积极参与的比例为 30% 或更少。而采用基于工作表的形式后,参与率提高到了 100%。此外,住院医师对课程的实用性、与其学习风格的一致性以及知识的提高等方面的评价也有了明显的提高。在完成调查的住院医师中,约有 64% 的人 "总是 "或 "有时 "提前完成工作表,而在提前完成工作表的住院医师中,有 92% 的人认为这能提高他们对教学的参与度。这一举措很容易应用于任何类型的住院医师培训项目,并可在目前分配的基础科学会议时间框架内完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信