Kristine Mendoza, Patricia Calero, Caroline Etland, Cynthia D Connelly
{"title":"Food Insecurity Status and Health Care Utilization Among COPD Patients: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Kristine Mendoza, Patricia Calero, Caroline Etland, Cynthia D Connelly","doi":"10.1177/01939459241274850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Government programs-targeting chronic disease patients with high health care costs-focus on clinical conditions, factors internal to the health care system, and individual patient education, not on addressing modifiable social determinants of health to reduce health care utilization.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate differences in sociodemographic variables and health care utilization between patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who reported food insecurity and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the electronic health records of a convenience sample of 854 participants with a discharge diagnosis of COPD or COPD with acute exacerbation, admitted via the emergency department of participating hospitals in Southern California. Chi-square (or Fisher's exact) tests and <i>t</i> tests were used to evaluate group differences, and multivariate (or Firth) logistic regression to identify factors that increased the odds of emergency department visits and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences between groups were identified for food insecurity (sometimes or often vs never insecure) and age (<i>P</i> < .001), race (<i>P</i> = .022), medical insurance (<i>P</i> < .001), zip code (<i>P</i> = .022), homeless status (<i>P</i> < .001), smoking status (<i>P</i> < .001), and emergency department visits (<i>P</i> = .033). No significant differences were found for food insecurity and hospitalizations (<i>P</i> = .592).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes to the growing body of research supporting the association of upstream social factors (food insecurity, homelessness, zip code) and downstream health outcomes (repeated emergency room visits), and how existing programs can be effectively utilized to impact downstream health outcomes such as health care utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241274850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Government programs-targeting chronic disease patients with high health care costs-focus on clinical conditions, factors internal to the health care system, and individual patient education, not on addressing modifiable social determinants of health to reduce health care utilization.
Objective: To evaluate differences in sociodemographic variables and health care utilization between patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who reported food insecurity and those who did not.
Methods: This descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the electronic health records of a convenience sample of 854 participants with a discharge diagnosis of COPD or COPD with acute exacerbation, admitted via the emergency department of participating hospitals in Southern California. Chi-square (or Fisher's exact) tests and t tests were used to evaluate group differences, and multivariate (or Firth) logistic regression to identify factors that increased the odds of emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
Results: Significant differences between groups were identified for food insecurity (sometimes or often vs never insecure) and age (P < .001), race (P = .022), medical insurance (P < .001), zip code (P = .022), homeless status (P < .001), smoking status (P < .001), and emergency department visits (P = .033). No significant differences were found for food insecurity and hospitalizations (P = .592).
Conclusion: This study contributes to the growing body of research supporting the association of upstream social factors (food insecurity, homelessness, zip code) and downstream health outcomes (repeated emergency room visits), and how existing programs can be effectively utilized to impact downstream health outcomes such as health care utilization.
背景:针对医疗费用高昂的慢性病患者的政府计划侧重于临床条件、医疗系统内部因素和患者个人教育,而不是解决可改变的健康社会决定因素以减少医疗利用率:评估报告食物无保障和未报告食物无保障的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者在社会人口学变量和医疗服务利用率方面的差异:这项描述性回顾性横断面研究使用了 854 名通过南加州参与研究的医院急诊科入院、出院诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病或慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重的参与者的电子健康记录数据。采用卡方检验(或费雪精确检验)和 t 检验来评估组间差异,并采用多变量(或费斯)逻辑回归来确定增加急诊就诊和住院几率的因素:在食物不安全(有时或经常与从不安全)、年龄(P P = .022)、医疗保险(P P = .022)、无家可归者状况(P P = .033)方面,各组之间存在显著差异。在食物不安全和住院治疗方面没有发现明显差异(P = .592):这项研究为越来越多支持上游社会因素(食物不安全、无家可归、邮政编码)与下游健康结果(重复急诊就诊)相关性的研究,以及如何有效利用现有计划来影响下游健康结果(如医疗保健利用率)的研究做出了贡献。