Association between visual attention and parent-reported social problems in pediatric cancer survivors.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nicole Kubinec, Kimberley P Heinrich, Annette E Richard, Elise K Hodges, Kaitlin A Oswald-McCloskey
{"title":"Association between visual attention and parent-reported social problems in pediatric cancer survivors.","authors":"Nicole Kubinec, Kimberley P Heinrich, Annette E Richard, Elise K Hodges, Kaitlin A Oswald-McCloskey","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2397950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social deficits in pediatric cancer survivors have been well documented and have been linked to neurocognitive late effects, particularly attention deficits. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between components of attention, both parent-report and a performance-based measure, with parent-reported social functioning in survivors of pediatric cancer. The study included data from outpatient neuropsychological evaluations of 76 survivors of pediatric cancer. The Integrated Visual and Auditory (IVA) continuous performance test was used to evaluate the components of attention with variables corresponding to Posner's model of attention. Assessment of inattention and peer problems were derived from the Conner's Parent Rating Scale, third edition. Parent-reported attention symptoms were significantly associated with worse auditory prudence (<i>r</i> = -0.382, <i>p</i> < .001) and visual consistency (<i>r</i> = -0.234, <i>p</i> = .046) and higher parent-reported peer problems (<i>r</i> = 0.302, <i>p</i> = .008). Auditory attention domains were not significantly predictive of peer problems (<i>p</i> > .05). When controlling for FSIQ and type of cancer, worse visual consistency (<i>p</i> = .029) and visual speed (<i>p</i> = .036) were significantly associated with more peer problems. Parent-reported inattention was associated with only some domains of performance-based attention, highlighting the importance of using multi-modal assessments of attention. This study also revealed an important relationship between visual attention and peer problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2397950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social deficits in pediatric cancer survivors have been well documented and have been linked to neurocognitive late effects, particularly attention deficits. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between components of attention, both parent-report and a performance-based measure, with parent-reported social functioning in survivors of pediatric cancer. The study included data from outpatient neuropsychological evaluations of 76 survivors of pediatric cancer. The Integrated Visual and Auditory (IVA) continuous performance test was used to evaluate the components of attention with variables corresponding to Posner's model of attention. Assessment of inattention and peer problems were derived from the Conner's Parent Rating Scale, third edition. Parent-reported attention symptoms were significantly associated with worse auditory prudence (r = -0.382, p < .001) and visual consistency (r = -0.234, p = .046) and higher parent-reported peer problems (r = 0.302, p = .008). Auditory attention domains were not significantly predictive of peer problems (p > .05). When controlling for FSIQ and type of cancer, worse visual consistency (p = .029) and visual speed (p = .036) were significantly associated with more peer problems. Parent-reported inattention was associated with only some domains of performance-based attention, highlighting the importance of using multi-modal assessments of attention. This study also revealed an important relationship between visual attention and peer problems.

儿科癌症幸存者的视觉注意力与家长报告的社会问题之间的关联。
儿科癌症幸存者的社交障碍已被充分证实,并与神经认知的后期影响有关,尤其是注意力障碍。本研究的目的是通过家长报告和基于表现的测量方法,研究注意力的组成部分与家长报告的儿科癌症幸存者社会功能之间的关联。这项研究包括了 76 名儿科癌症幸存者的门诊神经心理学评估数据。综合视听(IVA)连续表现测试被用来评估注意力的组成部分,其变量与波斯纳的注意力模型相对应。对注意力不集中和同伴问题的评估来自康纳家长评定量表(第三版)。家长报告的注意力症状与较差的听觉审慎性(r = -0.382,p r = -0.234,p = .046)和较高的家长报告的同伴问题(r = 0.302,p = .008)明显相关。听觉注意领域对同伴问题的预测作用不明显(p > .05)。在控制了 FSIQ 和癌症类型后,视觉一致性(p = .029)和视觉速度(p = .036)较差与同伴问题较多有明显关联。家长报告的注意力不集中只与基于表现的注意力的某些领域有关,这突出了使用多模态注意力评估的重要性。本研究还揭示了视觉注意力与同伴问题之间的重要关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信