Implementation of the WHO Standards to assess the quality of paediatric care using health workers as source of data: findings of a multicentre study (CHOICE) in Italy.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Ilaria Liguoro, Ilaria Mariani, Andrea Iuorio, Francesca Tirelli, Marcella Massarotto, Fabio Cardinale, Roberta Parrino, Sara Dal Bo, Sara Rivellini, Gian Luca Trobia, Kevin Valentino, Silvia Sordelli, Riccardo Lubrano, Giuseppina De Rosa, Michela Pandullo, Vita Antonella Di Stefano, Vanessa Martucci, Valentina Baltag, Egidio Barbi, Marzia Lazzerini
{"title":"Implementation of the WHO Standards to assess the quality of paediatric care using health workers as source of data: findings of a multicentre study (CHOICE) in Italy.","authors":"Ilaria Liguoro, Ilaria Mariani, Andrea Iuorio, Francesca Tirelli, Marcella Massarotto, Fabio Cardinale, Roberta Parrino, Sara Dal Bo, Sara Rivellini, Gian Luca Trobia, Kevin Valentino, Silvia Sordelli, Riccardo Lubrano, Giuseppina De Rosa, Michela Pandullo, Vita Antonella Di Stefano, Vanessa Martucci, Valentina Baltag, Egidio Barbi, Marzia Lazzerini","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is little experience in implementing the WHO Standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children. We describe the use of 75 WHO-Standard based Quality Measures to assess paediatric QOC, using health workers (HWs) as data sources.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>12 Italian hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The minimum target of 75% of HWs was reached in all facilities; answers from 598 HWs were analysed.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>75 prioritised WHO Quality Measures were collected using a validated, and Italian-language questionnaire exploring views of HWs providing care to children. A QOC index was also calculated based on the assessed Quality Measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both the domain of resources and work organisation, most Quality Measures showed a high overall frequency of reported 'need for improvement', with high variability across hospitals. Key needs for improvement included: availability of clear and complete protocols (eg, on paediatric emergencies: 44.6%; range 10.6%-92.6%); clear hospitalisation criteria for diarrhoea (50.5%; range 30.3%-71.7%); number of hand-washing stations (13.2%; range 3.4%-37.0%); equipped working rooms with computers for HWs (66.1%; range: 32.1%-97.0%); training (eg, on pain management: 43.5%; range 17.9%-76.7%), periodic discussion of clinical cases (43.5%; range 8.1%-83.7%) audits (48.8%; range 29.7%-76.7%); and all indicators related to system to improve QOC. Factors significantly associated with a lower QOC Index included HWs working in facilities in Southern Italy (p=0.001) and absence of a paediatric emergency department (p=0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the 75 prioritised Quality Measures, specific to HWs provide valuable data on paediatric QOC, which can be used to drive a quality improvement process.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There is little experience in implementing the WHO Standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children. We describe the use of 75 WHO-Standard based Quality Measures to assess paediatric QOC, using health workers (HWs) as data sources.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: 12 Italian hospitals.

Participants: The minimum target of 75% of HWs was reached in all facilities; answers from 598 HWs were analysed.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: 75 prioritised WHO Quality Measures were collected using a validated, and Italian-language questionnaire exploring views of HWs providing care to children. A QOC index was also calculated based on the assessed Quality Measures.

Results: In both the domain of resources and work organisation, most Quality Measures showed a high overall frequency of reported 'need for improvement', with high variability across hospitals. Key needs for improvement included: availability of clear and complete protocols (eg, on paediatric emergencies: 44.6%; range 10.6%-92.6%); clear hospitalisation criteria for diarrhoea (50.5%; range 30.3%-71.7%); number of hand-washing stations (13.2%; range 3.4%-37.0%); equipped working rooms with computers for HWs (66.1%; range: 32.1%-97.0%); training (eg, on pain management: 43.5%; range 17.9%-76.7%), periodic discussion of clinical cases (43.5%; range 8.1%-83.7%) audits (48.8%; range 29.7%-76.7%); and all indicators related to system to improve QOC. Factors significantly associated with a lower QOC Index included HWs working in facilities in Southern Italy (p=0.001) and absence of a paediatric emergency department (p=0.011).

Conclusions: The use of the 75 prioritised Quality Measures, specific to HWs provide valuable data on paediatric QOC, which can be used to drive a quality improvement process.

实施世界卫生组织标准,以卫生工作者为数据来源评估儿科护理质量:意大利多中心研究(CHOICE)的结果。
目标:实施世界卫生组织标准以提高儿童护理质量(QOC)的经验很少。我们介绍了以卫生工作者(HWs)为数据来源,使用 75 项基于世界卫生组织标准的质量衡量标准来评估儿科护理质量的情况:设计:横断面研究:参与者:12 家意大利医院主要和次要结果指标:通过一份经过验证的意大利语调查问卷,收集了75项优先考虑的世界卫生组织质量衡量标准,以了解为儿童提供护理的保健医生的意见。此外,还根据所评估的质量衡量标准计算了 QOC 指数:结果:在资源和工作组织这两个领域,大多数质量衡量标准都显示出较高的 "需要改进 "的总体频率,而且各医院之间的差异很大。需要改进的主要方面包括:提供清晰完整的规程(例如,儿科急诊:44.6%;范围 10.6%-92.6%);明确的腹泻住院标准(50.5%;范围 30.3%-71.7%);洗手台的数量(13.2%;范围 3.4%-37.0%);配备电脑的工作间。0%);配备电脑的保健医生工作间(66.1%;范围:32.1%-97.0%);培训(如疼痛管理:43.5%;范围:17.9%-76.7%);定期讨论临床病例(43.5%;范围:8.1%-83.7%);审计(48.8%;范围:29.7%-76.7%);以及所有与改善 QOC 系统有关的指标。与 QOC 指数较低明显相关的因素包括在意大利南部医疗机构工作的保健人员(p=0.001)和没有儿科急诊部门(p=0.011):结论:使用 75 项针对保健医生的优先质量措施可提供有关儿科 QOC 的宝贵数据,可用于推动质量改进进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信