Implementation of the WHO standards to assess the quality of care for children with acute diarrhoea: findings of a multicentre study (CHOICE) in Italy.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Marzia Lazzerini, Idanna Sforzi, Ilaria Liguoro, Enrico Felici, Stefano Martelossi, Silvia Bressan, Gian Luca Trobia, Riccardo Lubrano, Silvia Fasoli, Angela Troisi, Michela Pandullo, Marta Gagliardi, Paola Moras, Silvia Galiazzo, Marta Arrabito, Mariateresa Sanseviero, Mariangela Labruzzo, Sara Dal Bo, Valentina Baltag, Paolo Dalena
{"title":"Implementation of the WHO standards to assess the quality of care for children with acute diarrhoea: findings of a multicentre study (CHOICE) in Italy.","authors":"Marzia Lazzerini, Idanna Sforzi, Ilaria Liguoro, Enrico Felici, Stefano Martelossi, Silvia Bressan, Gian Luca Trobia, Riccardo Lubrano, Silvia Fasoli, Angela Troisi, Michela Pandullo, Marta Gagliardi, Paola Moras, Silvia Galiazzo, Marta Arrabito, Mariateresa Sanseviero, Mariangela Labruzzo, Sara Dal Bo, Valentina Baltag, Paolo Dalena","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no documented experience in the use of the WHO standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at the facility level. We describe the use of 10 prioritised WHO-Standard-based Quality Measures to assess QOC for children with acute diarrhoea (AD) in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicentre observational study in 11 paediatric emergency departments with different characteristics and geographical location, we collected data on 3061 children aged 6 months to 15 years with AD and no complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study findings highlighted both good practices and gaps in QoC, with major differences in QOC across facilities. Documentation of body weight and temperature varied from 7.7% to 98.5% and from 50% to 97.7%, respectively (p<0.001); antibiotic and probiotic prescription rates ranged from 0% to 10.1% and from 0% to 80.8%, respectively (p<0.001); hospitalisations rates ranged between 8.5% and 62.8% (p<0.001); written indications for reassessment were provided in 10.4%-90.2% of cases (p<0.001). When corrected for children's individual characteristics, the variable more consistently associated with each analysed outcome was the individual facility. Higher rates of antibiotics prescription (+7.6%, p=0.04) and hospitalisation (+52.9%, p<0.001) were observed for facilities in Southern Italy, compared with university centres (-36%, p<0.001), independently from children characteristics. Children's clinical characteristics in each centre were not associated with either hospitalisation or antibiotic prescription rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 10 prioritised WHO-Standard-based Quality Measures allow a rapid assessment of QOC in children with AD. Action is needed to identify and implement sustainable and effective interventions to ensure high QOC for all children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no documented experience in the use of the WHO standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at the facility level. We describe the use of 10 prioritised WHO-Standard-based Quality Measures to assess QOC for children with acute diarrhoea (AD) in Italy.

Methods: In a multicentre observational study in 11 paediatric emergency departments with different characteristics and geographical location, we collected data on 3061 children aged 6 months to 15 years with AD and no complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

Results: Study findings highlighted both good practices and gaps in QoC, with major differences in QOC across facilities. Documentation of body weight and temperature varied from 7.7% to 98.5% and from 50% to 97.7%, respectively (p<0.001); antibiotic and probiotic prescription rates ranged from 0% to 10.1% and from 0% to 80.8%, respectively (p<0.001); hospitalisations rates ranged between 8.5% and 62.8% (p<0.001); written indications for reassessment were provided in 10.4%-90.2% of cases (p<0.001). When corrected for children's individual characteristics, the variable more consistently associated with each analysed outcome was the individual facility. Higher rates of antibiotics prescription (+7.6%, p=0.04) and hospitalisation (+52.9%, p<0.001) were observed for facilities in Southern Italy, compared with university centres (-36%, p<0.001), independently from children characteristics. Children's clinical characteristics in each centre were not associated with either hospitalisation or antibiotic prescription rates.

Conclusions: The 10 prioritised WHO-Standard-based Quality Measures allow a rapid assessment of QOC in children with AD. Action is needed to identify and implement sustainable and effective interventions to ensure high QOC for all children.

世界卫生组织急性腹泻患儿护理质量评估标准的实施情况:意大利多中心研究(CHOICE)的结果。
背景:在设施层面使用世界卫生组织标准来提高儿童护理质量(QOC)方面,还没有记录在案的经验。我们介绍了在意大利使用 10 项基于世界卫生组织标准的优先质量措施来评估急性腹泻(AD)患儿护理质量的情况:我们在 11 个具有不同特点和地理位置的儿科急诊室开展了一项多中心观察研究,收集了 3061 名年龄在 6 个月至 15 岁之间、患有急性腹泻且无并发症的儿童的数据。研究进行了单变量和多变量分析:研究结果表明,在质量控制方面既有好的做法,也有不足之处,各医疗机构在质量控制方面存在很大差异。体重和体温的记录率分别从 7.7% 到 98.5% 和从 50% 到 97.7% 不等(p 结论:基于世界卫生组织标准的 10 项优先质量衡量标准可快速评估 AD 儿童的 QOC。需要采取行动,确定并实施可持续的有效干预措施,以确保所有儿童都能获得较高的质量分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信