Gastrointestinal cancer surgery in the elderly: The effects of preoperative oral nutritional supplements - A retrospective study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Shu-An Wang, Jingyue Gu, Xiaotian Chen, Jiayao Yang, Yan Xu
{"title":"Gastrointestinal cancer surgery in the elderly: The effects of preoperative oral nutritional supplements - A retrospective study.","authors":"Shu-An Wang, Jingyue Gu, Xiaotian Chen, Jiayao Yang, Yan Xu","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The current study aimed to explore the effect of nutritional prehabilitation on the clinical prognosis of elderly patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted, where participants were divided into two groups based on whether they received oral nutritional supplementation at the first outpatient visit. The nutritional prehabilitation group (n=41) adopted a nutritional prehabilitation mode (a standard energy intake of 25-30 kcal/kg· d was recommended). While the control group (n=55) received routine care. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Changes in nutritional status, complications, psychological status, symptoms, hospitalization days, and expenditures were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups of patients experienced weight loss. However, the decline in body weight in the prehabilitation group was less than that in the control group (-1.88 vs. -2.56 kg, p < 0.001). In the comparison of nutritional prehabilitation group and control group, significant improvements were observed in the Hospital Anxiety Scale scores (5 vs. 5, p = 0.01) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory scores (3 vs. 0, p < 0.001) respectively. The infection rate in the nutritional prehabilitation group was lower than that in the control group (17.1% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.04). Additionally, patients in the nutritional prehabilitation group had significantly fewer hospitalization days at discharge (14.3 vs. 17.1 days, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In elderly patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, a nutritional prehabilitation model may help maintain better physical and mental status, reduce infection rates, and shorten hospitalization days.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"33 4","pages":"581-588"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The current study aimed to explore the effect of nutritional prehabilitation on the clinical prognosis of elderly patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.

Methods and study design: A retrospective study was conducted, where participants were divided into two groups based on whether they received oral nutritional supplementation at the first outpatient visit. The nutritional prehabilitation group (n=41) adopted a nutritional prehabilitation mode (a standard energy intake of 25-30 kcal/kg· d was recommended). While the control group (n=55) received routine care. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Changes in nutritional status, complications, psychological status, symptoms, hospitalization days, and expenditures were compared between the two groups.

Results: Both groups of patients experienced weight loss. However, the decline in body weight in the prehabilitation group was less than that in the control group (-1.88 vs. -2.56 kg, p < 0.001). In the comparison of nutritional prehabilitation group and control group, significant improvements were observed in the Hospital Anxiety Scale scores (5 vs. 5, p = 0.01) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory scores (3 vs. 0, p < 0.001) respectively. The infection rate in the nutritional prehabilitation group was lower than that in the control group (17.1% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.04). Additionally, patients in the nutritional prehabilitation group had significantly fewer hospitalization days at discharge (14.3 vs. 17.1 days, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: In elderly patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, a nutritional prehabilitation model may help maintain better physical and mental status, reduce infection rates, and shorten hospitalization days.

老年人胃肠道癌症手术:术前口服营养补充剂的效果 - 一项回顾性研究。
研究背景和目的本研究旨在探讨营养预康复对接受腹部癌症手术的老年患者临床预后的影响:研究采用回顾性研究方法,根据首次门诊时是否接受口服营养补充剂将参与者分为两组。营养预康复组(41 人)采用营养预康复模式(建议标准能量摄入量为 25-30 千卡/千克-天)。对照组(55 人)接受常规护理。所有患者均根据美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南接受腹腔镜手术。对两组患者的营养状况、并发症、心理状态、症状、住院天数和支出的变化进行比较:结果:两组患者的体重都有所下降。结果:两组患者的体重均有下降,但康复前组的体重下降幅度小于对照组(-1.88 千克对 -2.56 千克,P < 0.001)。营养康复前组与对照组相比,医院焦虑量表评分(5 分对 5 分,P = 0.01)和 MD 安德森症状量表评分(3 分对 0 分,P < 0.001)分别有显著改善。营养康复组的感染率低于对照组(17.1% 对 36.4%,P = 0.04)。此外,营养康复组患者出院时的住院天数明显减少(14.3 天 vs. 17.1 天,p = 0.03):结论:对于接受腹部癌症手术的老年患者,营养康复模式可能有助于维持更好的身体和精神状态、降低感染率并缩短住院天数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition (APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish original research reports, reviews, short communications and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信