A survey of the Nutrition Care Process in Japanese acute care hospitals using a nationwide web-based questionnaire.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Keisuke Maeda, Fumie Egashira, Junko Ueshima, Yuri Horikoshi, Satoru Kamoshita
{"title":"A survey of the Nutrition Care Process in Japanese acute care hospitals using a nationwide web-based questionnaire.","authors":"Keisuke Maeda, Fumie Egashira, Junko Ueshima, Yuri Horikoshi, Satoru Kamoshita","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Study aim was to determine the levels and barriers of the Nutrition Care Process (NCP), a practical method of individualized nutrition support.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>Delegate of registered dietitians (RDs) from acute-care hospitals answered our nationwide web-based questionnaire (April-June, 2023) to determine the implementation status of screening, assessment, intervention (including planning), and monitoring (components of the NCP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5,378 institutions contacted, 905 (16.8%) responded. For Screening, 80.0% screened all inpatients: primary personnel in charge were RDs (57.6%); the most used screening tool was Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) (49.2%). For Assessment, 66.1% assessed all inpatients: food intake (93.3%) was most evaluated whereas muscle mass and strength (13.0%, 8.8%) were least evaluated. For Intervention, 43.9% did so within 48h of hospital admission: oral nutritional supplement (92.9%) was the most common RDs intervention and parenteral nutrition (29.9%) was used less. For Monitoring, 18.5% of institutions had monitoring frequency of ≥ 3 times/week whilst 23.0% had monitoring less than once a week for severely malnourished patients. Energy and protein intake (93.7%, 84.3%) were most monitored and lipid intake (30.1%) was less monitored.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers of NCP included inefficient staffing systems and unsuitable tools in Screening, inaccurate patient targeting and lack of important evaluation items in Assessment, delayed timing and incomplete contents in Intervention, and inadequate fre-quency and lack of important evaluation items in Monitoring. An increase in RDs staffing in acute-care general wards, widespread NCP instruction manuals, and education about the tools and evaluation items utilized in nutritional management are possible solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"33 4","pages":"515-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Study aim was to determine the levels and barriers of the Nutrition Care Process (NCP), a practical method of individualized nutrition support.

Methods and study design: Delegate of registered dietitians (RDs) from acute-care hospitals answered our nationwide web-based questionnaire (April-June, 2023) to determine the implementation status of screening, assessment, intervention (including planning), and monitoring (components of the NCP).

Results: Of 5,378 institutions contacted, 905 (16.8%) responded. For Screening, 80.0% screened all inpatients: primary personnel in charge were RDs (57.6%); the most used screening tool was Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) (49.2%). For Assessment, 66.1% assessed all inpatients: food intake (93.3%) was most evaluated whereas muscle mass and strength (13.0%, 8.8%) were least evaluated. For Intervention, 43.9% did so within 48h of hospital admission: oral nutritional supplement (92.9%) was the most common RDs intervention and parenteral nutrition (29.9%) was used less. For Monitoring, 18.5% of institutions had monitoring frequency of ≥ 3 times/week whilst 23.0% had monitoring less than once a week for severely malnourished patients. Energy and protein intake (93.7%, 84.3%) were most monitored and lipid intake (30.1%) was less monitored.

Conclusions: Barriers of NCP included inefficient staffing systems and unsuitable tools in Screening, inaccurate patient targeting and lack of important evaluation items in Assessment, delayed timing and incomplete contents in Intervention, and inadequate fre-quency and lack of important evaluation items in Monitoring. An increase in RDs staffing in acute-care general wards, widespread NCP instruction manuals, and education about the tools and evaluation items utilized in nutritional management are possible solutions.

使用全国性网络问卷对日本急症护理医院的营养护理流程进行调查。
背景和目的:研究目的是确定营养护理程序(NCP)的水平和障碍:研究目的是确定营养护理流程(NCP)的水平和障碍,这是一种个体化营养支持的实用方法:来自急诊医院的注册营养师(RDs)代表回答了我们的全国性网络问卷(2023 年 4 月至 6 月),以确定筛查、评估、干预(包括计划)和监测(NCP 的组成部分)的实施情况:结果:在所联系的 5378 家机构中,有 905 家(16.8%)做出了回应。在筛查方面,80.0%的机构对所有住院患者进行了筛查:主要负责人员为研发人员(57.6%);最常用的筛查工具是主观全面评估(SGA)(49.2%)。在评估方面,66.1% 对所有住院患者进行了评估:食物摄入量(93.3%)评估最多,而肌肉质量和力量(13.0%、8.8%)评估最少。在干预方面,43.9%的机构在入院 48 小时内进行了干预:口服营养补充剂(92.9%)是最常见的研发干预措施,而肠外营养(29.9%)使用较少。在监测方面,18.5%的机构监测频率≥每周 3 次,23.0%的机构对严重营养不良患者的监测频率少于每周 1 次。能量和蛋白质摄入量(93.7%、84.3%)监测最多,而脂质摄入量(30.1%)监测较少:国家营养计划的障碍包括筛查中的人员配备系统效率低下和工具不合适,评估中的患者定位不准确和缺乏重要的评估项目,干预中的时间延误和内容不完整,监测中的频率不足和缺乏重要的评估项目。增加急症护理普通病房的营养师人手、普及 NCP 指导手册以及开展有关营养管理中使用的工具和评估项目的教育是可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition (APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish original research reports, reviews, short communications and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信