A nomogram for predicting nutritional risk before gastric cancer surgery.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Changhua Li, Jinlu Liu, Congjun Wang, Yihuan Luo, Lanhui Qin, Peiyin Chen, Junqiang Chen
{"title":"A nomogram for predicting nutritional risk before gastric cancer surgery.","authors":"Changhua Li, Jinlu Liu, Congjun Wang, Yihuan Luo, Lanhui Qin, Peiyin Chen, Junqiang Chen","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Patients with GC have higher nutritional risk. This study aimed to construct a nomogram model for predicting preoperative nutritional risk in patients with GC in order to assess preoperative nutritional risk in patients more precisely.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>Patients diagnosed with GC and undergoing surgical treatment were included in this study. Data was collected through clinical information, laboratory testing, and radiomics-derived characteristics. Least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and multi-variable logistic regression were employed to construct a clinical prediction model, which takes the form of a logistic nomogram. The effectiveness of the nomogram model was evaluated using receiver operat-ing characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of three predictors, namely body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin (Hb) and radiomics characteristic score (Radscore) were identified by LASSO regression analysis from a total of 21 variables studied. The model constructed using these three predictors displayed medium prediction ability. The area under the ROC curve was 0.895 (95% CI 0.844-0.945) in the training set, with a cutoff value of 0.651, precision of 0.957, and sensitivity of 0.718. In the validation set, it was 0.880 (95% CI 0.806-0.954), with a cutoff value of 0.655, precision of 0.930, and sensitivity of 0.698. DCA also confirmed the clinical benefit of the combined model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This simple and dependable nomogram model for clinical prediction can assist physicians in assessing preoperative nutritional risk in GC patients in a time-efficient and accurate manner to facilitate early identification and diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Patients with GC have higher nutritional risk. This study aimed to construct a nomogram model for predicting preoperative nutritional risk in patients with GC in order to assess preoperative nutritional risk in patients more precisely.

Methods and study design: Patients diagnosed with GC and undergoing surgical treatment were included in this study. Data was collected through clinical information, laboratory testing, and radiomics-derived characteristics. Least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and multi-variable logistic regression were employed to construct a clinical prediction model, which takes the form of a logistic nomogram. The effectiveness of the nomogram model was evaluated using receiver operat-ing characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: A total of three predictors, namely body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin (Hb) and radiomics characteristic score (Radscore) were identified by LASSO regression analysis from a total of 21 variables studied. The model constructed using these three predictors displayed medium prediction ability. The area under the ROC curve was 0.895 (95% CI 0.844-0.945) in the training set, with a cutoff value of 0.651, precision of 0.957, and sensitivity of 0.718. In the validation set, it was 0.880 (95% CI 0.806-0.954), with a cutoff value of 0.655, precision of 0.930, and sensitivity of 0.698. DCA also confirmed the clinical benefit of the combined model.

Conclusions: This simple and dependable nomogram model for clinical prediction can assist physicians in assessing preoperative nutritional risk in GC patients in a time-efficient and accurate manner to facilitate early identification and diagnosis.

预测胃癌手术前营养风险的提名图。
背景和目的:胃癌(GC)是全球第四大癌症死因。胃癌患者的营养风险较高。本研究旨在构建一个预测 GC 患者术前营养风险的提名图模型,以便更准确地评估患者的术前营养风险:方法和研究设计:本研究纳入了确诊为 GC 并接受手术治疗的患者。通过临床信息、实验室检测和放射组学特征收集数据。采用最小绝对收缩选择算子(LASSO)回归分析和多变量逻辑回归构建临床预测模型,该模型采用逻辑提名图的形式。结果显示,共有三个预测因子,分别是 "胰腺癌"、"胃癌 "和 "乳腺癌":结果:通过 LASSO 回归分析,从总共 21 个研究变量中找出了三个预测因子,即体重指数(BMI)、血红蛋白(Hb)和放射组学特征评分(Radscore)。利用这三个预测因子构建的模型显示出中等预测能力。训练集的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.895(95% CI 0.844-0.945),临界值为 0.651,精确度为 0.957,灵敏度为 0.718。在验证集中,该值为 0.880(95% CI 0.806-0.954),临界值为 0.655,精确度为 0.930,灵敏度为 0.698。DCA也证实了组合模型的临床益处:这一简单可靠的临床预测提名图模型可以帮助医生及时准确地评估 GC 患者的术前营养风险,从而促进早期识别和诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition (APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish original research reports, reviews, short communications and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信