European Union border technology in Africa: Experiences en route

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Ngozi Louis Uzomah
{"title":"European Union border technology in Africa: Experiences en route","authors":"Ngozi Louis Uzomah","doi":"10.1002/psp.2824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The EU externalisation policy on border management and migration control in Africa has increasingly relied on the use of technology in recent times. This paper examines how these technological interventions for border governance in Africa infringe on migrants' rights and mobility patterns. Exploring the effect of deployment of Migration Information Data Analysis System in Nigeria, risk analysis cells in Niger and biometric registration of migrants in Mauritania, the study finds infringements on the migration pattern of the people. The biometric exercise in Mauritania hampers the northward movement of mainly male migrants, aged between 18 and 46, who are mostly from Senegal, Gambia, Nigeria, Guinea Conakry and Mali. Data collected from these migrants, are shared on EU digital platforms, between IOM, Europol and FRONTEX, and can be used to facilitate their deportation as they approach Europe's border space. While emphasising the significance of this work on the geography of population movement, this paper argues that the use of EU-funded technological projects for border management infringes on the historical cross-border mobility in North and West Africa which is essential for socioeconomic exchanges and escaping conflicts. It highlights these restrictive practices as mirroring the hegemonic relationship between Europe and Africa that reinforces colonial-era violence at Africa's border space. The paper draws from non-participatory observation, instant interactions and 78 semi-structured interviews conducted with migrants, cross-border traders, government officials, civil society organisations, motorists, residents and the media along two major migration routes: between Nigeria and Niger and between Mauritania and Western Sahara (Morocco).</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"30 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.2824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The EU externalisation policy on border management and migration control in Africa has increasingly relied on the use of technology in recent times. This paper examines how these technological interventions for border governance in Africa infringe on migrants' rights and mobility patterns. Exploring the effect of deployment of Migration Information Data Analysis System in Nigeria, risk analysis cells in Niger and biometric registration of migrants in Mauritania, the study finds infringements on the migration pattern of the people. The biometric exercise in Mauritania hampers the northward movement of mainly male migrants, aged between 18 and 46, who are mostly from Senegal, Gambia, Nigeria, Guinea Conakry and Mali. Data collected from these migrants, are shared on EU digital platforms, between IOM, Europol and FRONTEX, and can be used to facilitate their deportation as they approach Europe's border space. While emphasising the significance of this work on the geography of population movement, this paper argues that the use of EU-funded technological projects for border management infringes on the historical cross-border mobility in North and West Africa which is essential for socioeconomic exchanges and escaping conflicts. It highlights these restrictive practices as mirroring the hegemonic relationship between Europe and Africa that reinforces colonial-era violence at Africa's border space. The paper draws from non-participatory observation, instant interactions and 78 semi-structured interviews conducted with migrants, cross-border traders, government officials, civil society organisations, motorists, residents and the media along two major migration routes: between Nigeria and Niger and between Mauritania and Western Sahara (Morocco).

欧盟在非洲的边境技术:途中的经验
近来,欧盟关于非洲边境管理和移民控制的外部化政策越来越依赖于技术的使用。本文探讨了这些用于非洲边境管理的技术干预措施如何侵害移民的权利和流动模式。本研究探讨了在尼日利亚部署移民信息数据分析系统、在尼日尔部署风险分析单元以及在毛里塔尼亚对移民进行生物识别登记所产生的影响,发现这些措施侵犯了人们的移民模式。毛里塔尼亚的生物识别工作阻碍了主要来自塞内加尔、冈比亚、尼日利亚、几内亚科纳克里和马里的 18 至 46 岁男性移民向北迁移。从这些移民那里收集到的数据可在欧盟数字平台上共享,在国际移民组织、欧洲刑警组织和法国国家边境署之间共享,当他们接近欧洲边境空间时,这些数据可用于协助将他们驱逐出境。本文在强调这项工作对人口流动地理学意义重大的同时,认为利用欧盟资助的技术项目进行边境管理侵犯了北非和西非历史上的跨境流动性,而这种流动性对社会经济交流和逃避冲突至关重要。本文强调这些限制性做法反映了欧洲与非洲之间的霸权关系,这种关系强化了非洲边境空间殖民时代的暴力。本文采用非参与性观察、即时互动和 78 次半结构式访谈的方法,对尼日利亚和尼日尔之间以及毛里塔尼亚和西撒哈拉(摩洛哥)之间两条主要移民路线沿线的移民、跨境贸易商、政府官员、民间社会组织、驾车者、居民和媒体进行了采访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信