Response to letter to the Editor from R. R. Patyar and S. Patyar on “Beyond the label: Investigating clinical ramifications of plant-based milk alternatives”

IF 15.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Pui Yee Lee, Sze Ying Leong, Indrawati Oey
{"title":"Response to letter to the Editor from R. R. Patyar and S. Patyar on “Beyond the label: Investigating clinical ramifications of plant-based milk alternatives”","authors":"Pui Yee Lee,&nbsp;Sze Ying Leong,&nbsp;Indrawati Oey","doi":"10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-dairy milk is still considered as a relatively new food product category and has been a debatable topic until today, from its name, nutritional benefits, labelling, to whether the product sensory characteristics should be similar or different to cow's milk. In this letter, we firstly clarified the term “Protein Blend” to describe blends of whole plant milks and plant-dairy ingredients, rather than isolated proteins or protein-rich fractions. We also addressed the inaccurate categorisation of quinoa and buckwheat as cereals instead of pseudo-cereals from a scientific view. Secondly, we acknowledged the potential for food-drug interactions in plant-based milk alternative (PMBA) products, and stress the need for consumer education and systematic research to mitigate these risks and ensure safe pharmacotherapy. Lastly, we explored whether shelf-life of PMBA products is important in influencing consumer perceptions. In conclusion, PBMAs represent an emergent, sophisticated, and controversial topic within food science. This emerging field combines advanced technological developments with shifting consumer preferences, sparking debates across nutritional, environmental, and economic implications. The original article by Lee et al. (2024) was written through the lens of consumer perceptions, using terminologies that predominantly reflect consumer language, which may differ from more technical or scientific definitions. This notable discrepancy underlines the need for further research to bridge the gap between consumer understanding and scientific discourse. We hope this letter clarifies the discussed issues and encourages further research aimed at aligning scientific understanding with consumer perceptions, and fostering collaboration among food lawmakers, food scientists, and health professionals to ensure accurate labelling, and the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy involving PBMAs, particularly in light of potential food-drug interactions within this emerging product category.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":441,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Food Science & Technology","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 104680"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Food Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422442400356X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-dairy milk is still considered as a relatively new food product category and has been a debatable topic until today, from its name, nutritional benefits, labelling, to whether the product sensory characteristics should be similar or different to cow's milk. In this letter, we firstly clarified the term “Protein Blend” to describe blends of whole plant milks and plant-dairy ingredients, rather than isolated proteins or protein-rich fractions. We also addressed the inaccurate categorisation of quinoa and buckwheat as cereals instead of pseudo-cereals from a scientific view. Secondly, we acknowledged the potential for food-drug interactions in plant-based milk alternative (PMBA) products, and stress the need for consumer education and systematic research to mitigate these risks and ensure safe pharmacotherapy. Lastly, we explored whether shelf-life of PMBA products is important in influencing consumer perceptions. In conclusion, PBMAs represent an emergent, sophisticated, and controversial topic within food science. This emerging field combines advanced technological developments with shifting consumer preferences, sparking debates across nutritional, environmental, and economic implications. The original article by Lee et al. (2024) was written through the lens of consumer perceptions, using terminologies that predominantly reflect consumer language, which may differ from more technical or scientific definitions. This notable discrepancy underlines the need for further research to bridge the gap between consumer understanding and scientific discourse. We hope this letter clarifies the discussed issues and encourages further research aimed at aligning scientific understanding with consumer perceptions, and fostering collaboration among food lawmakers, food scientists, and health professionals to ensure accurate labelling, and the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy involving PBMAs, particularly in light of potential food-drug interactions within this emerging product category.

对 R. R. Patyar 和 S. Patyar 就 "标签之外:调查植物基牛奶替代品的临床影响"
非乳仍被视为一个相对较新的食品类别,从其名称、营养益处、标签到产品的感官特征应与牛奶相似还是不同,直到今天仍是一个备受争议的话题。在这封信中,我们首先澄清了 "蛋白质混合物 "一词,它指的是全植物乳和植物乳成分的混合物,而不是孤立的蛋白质或富含蛋白质的部分。我们还从科学角度解决了将藜麦和荞麦归类为谷物而不是伪谷物的不准确问题。其次,我们认识到植物基牛奶替代品(PMBA)中可能存在食物-药物相互作用,并强调有必要开展消费者教育和系统研究,以降低这些风险,确保安全的药物治疗。最后,我们探讨了 PMBA 产品的保质期是否会对消费者的看法产生重要影响。总之,PBMA 是食品科学中一个新兴的、复杂的和有争议的课题。这一新兴领域结合了先进的技术发展和不断变化的消费者偏好,引发了有关营养、环境和经济影响的争论。Lee 等人(2024 年)的原创文章从消费者的角度出发,使用了主要反映消费者语言的术语,这些术语可能不同于技术或科学定义。这种明显的差异强调了进一步研究的必要性,以弥合消费者理解与科学论述之间的差距。我们希望这封信能澄清所讨论的问题,并鼓励开展进一步研究,使科学理解与消费者认知相一致,促进食品立法者、食品科学家和卫生专业人员之间的合作,以确保标签准确无误,并确保涉及 PBMAs 的药物疗法的安全性和有效性,特别是考虑到这一新兴产品类别中潜在的食物与药物之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Trends in Food Science & Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
32.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
322
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Food Science & Technology is a prestigious international journal that specializes in peer-reviewed articles covering the latest advancements in technology, food science, and human nutrition. It serves as a bridge between specialized primary journals and general trade magazines, providing readable and scientifically rigorous reviews and commentaries on current research developments and their potential applications in the food industry. Unlike traditional journals, Trends in Food Science & Technology does not publish original research papers. Instead, it focuses on critical and comprehensive reviews to offer valuable insights for professionals in the field. By bringing together cutting-edge research and industry applications, this journal plays a vital role in disseminating knowledge and facilitating advancements in the food science and technology sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信