Association of Quantity and Diversity of Different Types of Fruit Intake with New-Onset Kidney Stones

IF 4.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xiaoqin Gan, Sisi Yang, Chun Zhou, Panpan He, Ziliang Ye, Mengyi Liu, Yanjun Zhang, Yu Huang, Hao Xiang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xianhui Qin
{"title":"Association of Quantity and Diversity of Different Types of Fruit Intake with New-Onset Kidney Stones","authors":"Xiaoqin Gan,&nbsp;Sisi Yang,&nbsp;Chun Zhou,&nbsp;Panpan He,&nbsp;Ziliang Ye,&nbsp;Mengyi Liu,&nbsp;Yanjun Zhang,&nbsp;Yu Huang,&nbsp;Hao Xiang,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Xianhui Qin","doi":"10.1002/mnfr.202400373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Scope</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to assess the association between intake of different types of fruit (citrus, pomes, tropical fruits, berries, gourds, drupes, dried fruits, and other fruits), the intake diversity of fruit types, and risk of new-onset kidney stones in general population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 205 896 participants with at least one completed 24-h dietary recall from the UK Biobank are included. During a median follow-up of 11.6 years, 2074 cases of kidney stones are documented. Compared with nonconsumers, participants with higher intake of citrus (50–&lt;100 g day<sup>−1</sup>; hazards ratio [HR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–0.91; ≥100 g day<sup>−1</sup>; HR = 0.75; 95%CI, 0.63–0.89), pomes (≥100 g day<sup>−1</sup>; HR = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.77–0.96), or tropical fruits (50–&lt;100 g day<sup>−1</sup>; HR = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.75–0.99; ≥100 g day<sup>−1</sup>; HR = 0.88; 95%CI, 0.79–0.99) have a lower risk of new-onset kidney stones. However, there is no significant association of intake of berries, gourds, drupes, dried fruits, and other fruits with kidney stones. A higher fruit variety score is significantly associated with a lower risk of new-onset kidney stones (per 1-score increment, HR = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.81–0.91).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Higher intake of citruses (≥50 g day<sup>−1</sup>), pomes (≥100 g day<sup>−1</sup>), and tropical fruits (≥50 g day<sup>−1</sup>), as well as increasing diversity of intake of these three fruits, are associated with a lower risk of new-onset kidney stones.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":212,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research","volume":"68 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mnfr.202400373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scope

This study aims to assess the association between intake of different types of fruit (citrus, pomes, tropical fruits, berries, gourds, drupes, dried fruits, and other fruits), the intake diversity of fruit types, and risk of new-onset kidney stones in general population.

Methods and results

A total of 205 896 participants with at least one completed 24-h dietary recall from the UK Biobank are included. During a median follow-up of 11.6 years, 2074 cases of kidney stones are documented. Compared with nonconsumers, participants with higher intake of citrus (50–<100 g day−1; hazards ratio [HR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–0.91; ≥100 g day−1; HR = 0.75; 95%CI, 0.63–0.89), pomes (≥100 g day−1; HR = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.77–0.96), or tropical fruits (50–<100 g day−1; HR = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.75–0.99; ≥100 g day−1; HR = 0.88; 95%CI, 0.79–0.99) have a lower risk of new-onset kidney stones. However, there is no significant association of intake of berries, gourds, drupes, dried fruits, and other fruits with kidney stones. A higher fruit variety score is significantly associated with a lower risk of new-onset kidney stones (per 1-score increment, HR = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.81–0.91).

Conclusions

Higher intake of citruses (≥50 g day−1), pomes (≥100 g day−1), and tropical fruits (≥50 g day−1), as well as increasing diversity of intake of these three fruits, are associated with a lower risk of new-onset kidney stones.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同种类水果的摄入量和多样性与新发肾结石的关系
研究范围本研究旨在评估不同类型水果(柑橘、柚子、热带水果、浆果、葫芦、核果、干果和其他水果)的摄入量、水果类型摄入量的多样性与普通人群新发肾结石风险之间的关系:共纳入了英国生物库中至少完成过一次 24 小时饮食回忆的 205 896 名参与者。在11.6年的中位随访期间,共记录了2074例肾结石病例。此外,吃水果(≥100 克/天-1;HR = 0.86;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.77-0.96)或热带水果(50--1;HR = 0.86;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.75-0.99;≥100 克/天-1;HR = 0.88;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.79-0.99)的人患新发肾结石的风险较低。然而,浆果、葫芦、核果、干果和其他水果的摄入量与肾结石没有明显的关联。水果种类得分越高,新发肾结石的风险越低(每增加1分,HR=0.86;95%CI,0.81-0.91):结论:柠檬(≥50 克/天-1)、柚子(≥100 克/天-1)和热带水果(≥50 克/天-1)的摄入量越高,以及这三种水果摄入量的多样性越多,新发肾结石的风险就越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Nutrition & Food Research is a primary research journal devoted to health, safety and all aspects of molecular nutrition such as nutritional biochemistry, nutrigenomics and metabolomics aiming to link the information arising from related disciplines: Bioactivity: Nutritional and medical effects of food constituents including bioavailability and kinetics. Immunology: Understanding the interactions of food and the immune system. Microbiology: Food spoilage, food pathogens, chemical and physical approaches of fermented foods and novel microbial processes. Chemistry: Isolation and analysis of bioactive food ingredients while considering environmental aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信