Development and psychometric evaluation of a new domain-specific coparenting measure: Coparenting Children's Emotion Scale.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1111/famp.13031
Christina C Ambrosi, Phillip S Kavanagh, Subhadra Evans, Sophie S Havighurst
{"title":"Development and psychometric evaluation of a new domain-specific coparenting measure: Coparenting Children's Emotion Scale.","authors":"Christina C Ambrosi, Phillip S Kavanagh, Subhadra Evans, Sophie S Havighurst","doi":"10.1111/famp.13031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caregivers play an integral role in supporting children's development, not only through their individual parenting practices but also how they work together as coparents. The literature on coparenting is extensive; however, most of the research has relied on global measures to assess the quality and functioning of the coparenting relationship. Examining the coparenting relationship with domain-specific measures enables a deeper understanding of this complex family process. One domain of particular interest is emotion socialization given the vast and long-term consequences emotion socialization has on children's emotional, social, behavioral, and psychological functioning. Emotion socialization literature would benefit from a domain-specific coparenting measure, as researchers have rarely explored how coparents work together when responding to their children's emotions (i.e., coparenting children's emotions). As such, an emotion-focused coparenting measure could address gaps in both coparenting and emotion socialization literature. This study outlines the development and psychometric evaluation of a domain-specific measure of coparenting, the Coparenting Children's Emotion Scale (CCES), which assesses how parents work together when responding to their children's emotions. In the current study, the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the CCES were examined in an Australian sample. Findings from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the CCES comprises two subscales that capture coparents' levels of support/cooperation and undermining. In the current sample, both CCES subscales demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency, and good convergent and concurrent validity. The CCES will provide researchers and practitioners with a domain-specific measure to use in exploratory and intervention research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caregivers play an integral role in supporting children's development, not only through their individual parenting practices but also how they work together as coparents. The literature on coparenting is extensive; however, most of the research has relied on global measures to assess the quality and functioning of the coparenting relationship. Examining the coparenting relationship with domain-specific measures enables a deeper understanding of this complex family process. One domain of particular interest is emotion socialization given the vast and long-term consequences emotion socialization has on children's emotional, social, behavioral, and psychological functioning. Emotion socialization literature would benefit from a domain-specific coparenting measure, as researchers have rarely explored how coparents work together when responding to their children's emotions (i.e., coparenting children's emotions). As such, an emotion-focused coparenting measure could address gaps in both coparenting and emotion socialization literature. This study outlines the development and psychometric evaluation of a domain-specific measure of coparenting, the Coparenting Children's Emotion Scale (CCES), which assesses how parents work together when responding to their children's emotions. In the current study, the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the CCES were examined in an Australian sample. Findings from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the CCES comprises two subscales that capture coparents' levels of support/cooperation and undermining. In the current sample, both CCES subscales demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency, and good convergent and concurrent validity. The CCES will provide researchers and practitioners with a domain-specific measure to use in exploratory and intervention research.

针对特定领域的新型共同养育测量方法的开发和心理测量评估:养育子女情绪量表。
照顾者在支持儿童发展方面发挥着不可或缺的作用,这不仅体现在他们个人的养育行为上,还体现在他们作为共同父母的合作方式上。有关共同养育的文献很多,但大多数研究都依赖于全面的测量方法来评估共同养育关系的质量和功能。使用特定领域的测量方法来研究共同养育关系,可以更深入地了解这一复杂的家庭过程。鉴于情感社会化对儿童的情感、社交、行为和心理功能产生巨大而长期的影响,情感社会化是一个特别值得关注的领域。情绪社会化文献将受益于特定领域的共同养育测量方法,因为研究人员很少探讨共同父母在应对子女情绪时如何合作(即共同养育子女的情绪)。因此,以情绪为重点的共同养育测量可以弥补共同养育和情绪社会化文献的不足。本研究概述了一种特定领域的共同养育测量--共同养育子女情绪量表(CCES)--的开发和心理测量学评估,该量表可评估父母在应对子女情绪时的合作情况。本研究以澳大利亚样本为研究对象,对 CCES 的因子结构、信度和效度进行了检验。探索性和确认性因素分析的结果表明,CCES 包括两个子量表,分别反映了父母双方的支持/合作水平和破坏水平。在目前的样本中,CCES 的两个分量表都表现出良好甚至极佳的内部一致性,以及良好的收敛性和并发性。CCES将为研究人员和从业人员提供一种特定领域的测量方法,用于探索性研究和干预研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信