Outpatient Pediatric Palliative Care Development: Guidance on Building Sustainable Programs.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0148
Casie James, Suraj Sarvode Mothi, Elissa G Miller, Erica C Kaye, Alexis Morvant, Caroline Stafford, Ashley K Autrey
{"title":"Outpatient Pediatric Palliative Care Development: Guidance on Building Sustainable Programs.","authors":"Casie James, Suraj Sarvode Mothi, Elissa G Miller, Erica C Kaye, Alexis Morvant, Caroline Stafford, Ashley K Autrey","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Context:</i></b> As pediatric palliative care (PPC) expands within institutions and nationally, little guidance is available on building outpatient programs. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> We asked outpatient PPC (OPPC) program leaders in the United States about clinic development experiences to gather advice for growing programs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> As part of a larger OPPC study, 48 freestanding children's hospitals with inpatient PPC programs were invited to complete a survey on OPPC. Self-selected participants were sent a follow-up survey soliciting free-text responses about development experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Qualitative data underwent inductive content analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-six hospitals completed the initial survey, and 28 (78%) reported practicing clinic-based OPPC. Twenty-two of 28 completed program development questions. More than half (12/22, 55%) recommended a minimum total billable full-time equivalent (FTE) ≥3 before expanding into the outpatient setting. About two-thirds (14/22, 64%) suggested a minimum billable FTE ≥4 for 24/7 coverage. Half (50%) reported that their program grew from subspecialty clinics, most frequently hematology-oncology (10/11, 91%). Half (50%) placed initial limits on referrals, with many restricting schedule availability (7/11, 64%). Six of 12 participants (50%) willing to share more about their development experience completed a follow-up survey, from which three themes emerged: program logistics, expectations and boundaries, and establishing role and workflow. Participants focused advice on slow programmatic growth to optimize sustainability. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Program leaders offer tangible guidance informed by their OPPC development experience. Future work is needed to leverage this advice within institutions to promote resilient and sustainable PPC growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1489-1496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: As pediatric palliative care (PPC) expands within institutions and nationally, little guidance is available on building outpatient programs. Objectives: We asked outpatient PPC (OPPC) program leaders in the United States about clinic development experiences to gather advice for growing programs. Methods: As part of a larger OPPC study, 48 freestanding children's hospitals with inpatient PPC programs were invited to complete a survey on OPPC. Self-selected participants were sent a follow-up survey soliciting free-text responses about development experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Qualitative data underwent inductive content analysis. Results: Thirty-six hospitals completed the initial survey, and 28 (78%) reported practicing clinic-based OPPC. Twenty-two of 28 completed program development questions. More than half (12/22, 55%) recommended a minimum total billable full-time equivalent (FTE) ≥3 before expanding into the outpatient setting. About two-thirds (14/22, 64%) suggested a minimum billable FTE ≥4 for 24/7 coverage. Half (50%) reported that their program grew from subspecialty clinics, most frequently hematology-oncology (10/11, 91%). Half (50%) placed initial limits on referrals, with many restricting schedule availability (7/11, 64%). Six of 12 participants (50%) willing to share more about their development experience completed a follow-up survey, from which three themes emerged: program logistics, expectations and boundaries, and establishing role and workflow. Participants focused advice on slow programmatic growth to optimize sustainability. Conclusion: Program leaders offer tangible guidance informed by their OPPC development experience. Future work is needed to leverage this advice within institutions to promote resilient and sustainable PPC growth.

儿科姑息关怀门诊发展:建立可持续计划指南》。
背景:随着儿科姑息关怀(PPC)在医疗机构和全国范围内的扩展,关于门诊项目建设的指导却少之又少。目标:我们向美国的门诊姑息关怀项目(OPPC)负责人询问了诊所的发展经验,为项目的发展收集建议。方法:作为一项大型 OPPC 研究的一部分,我们邀请了 48 家拥有 PPC 住院项目的独立儿童医院完成一项关于 OPPC 的调查。我们向自主选择的参与者发送了一份后续调查,征求他们对发展经验的自由文本回复。对定量数据进行了描述性统计分析。对定性数据进行归纳内容分析。结果:有 36 家医院完成了初步调查,其中 28 家(78%)报告说它们开展了以诊所为基础的 OPPC。28 家医院中有 22 家完成了项目开发问题。超过半数的医院(12/22,55%)建议在将业务扩展到门诊环境之前,至少要达到可收费全职当量(FTE)≥3。约三分之二(14/22,64%)的人建议,全天候服务的最低计费全职当量≥4。半数(50%)报告称,他们的项目是从亚专科诊所发展起来的,最常见的是血液肿瘤科(10/11,91%)。半数参与者(50%)对转诊进行了初步限制,其中许多人限制了时间安排(7/11,64%)。愿意分享更多发展经验的 12 位参与者中,有 6 位(50%)完成了后续调查,从中发现了三个主题:项目后勤、期望和界限,以及确立角色和工作流程。参与者主要建议计划缓慢增长,以优化可持续性。结论:计划领导者根据其 OPPC 的发展经验提供了切实可行的指导。今后需要开展工作,在各机构内利用这些建议,促进计划伙伴关系中心的弹性和可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信