Subjective Cognitive Dysfunction in Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Western Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1177/01939459241272039
Heather Cuevas, Elizabeth Heitkemper, Jeeyeon Kim
{"title":"Subjective Cognitive Dysfunction in Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.","authors":"Heather Cuevas, Elizabeth Heitkemper, Jeeyeon Kim","doi":"10.1177/01939459241272039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Qualitative studies have examined the experiences of subjective cognitive dysfunction in specific populations or specific disease stages, but there has not yet been a systematic synthesis and evaluation of findings related to perceptions of subjective cognitive dysfunction in nondementia-related chronic illnesses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was 2-fold: (1) to undertake a systematic review of experiences of subjective cognitive dysfunction in people with nondementia-related chronic disease and (2) to develop an explanatory framework to describe the experiences of living with subjective cognitive dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were systematically searched for studies on subjective cognitive dysfunction up to June 2023. Qualitative synthesis was conducted on the final sample (N = 25) using Sandelowski's adaptation of Nobilt and Hare's reciprocal transactional analysis method. Critical appraisal was completed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through constant comparison of key concepts, findings were organized within 4 interrelated themes that informed a conceptual explanatory model of adapting to living with subjective cognitive dysfunction: (1) symptoms, (2) health care, (3) perceptions of self, and (4) relationships. Participants highlighted how subjective cognitive dysfunction affected interactions in health care settings and involved other symptoms that in turn complicated meaning, self-enhancement, and mastery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our model of the process of adapting provides a new way to conceptualize cognitive dysfunction in chronic illness and suggests opportunities for health care professionals to support patients and their families. The results highlight the need for more research to better understand the role of subjective cognitive dysfunction in nondementia-related chronic illnesses.The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021231410).</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241272039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Qualitative studies have examined the experiences of subjective cognitive dysfunction in specific populations or specific disease stages, but there has not yet been a systematic synthesis and evaluation of findings related to perceptions of subjective cognitive dysfunction in nondementia-related chronic illnesses.

Objective: The aim of this study was 2-fold: (1) to undertake a systematic review of experiences of subjective cognitive dysfunction in people with nondementia-related chronic disease and (2) to develop an explanatory framework to describe the experiences of living with subjective cognitive dysfunction.

Methods: Four databases were systematically searched for studies on subjective cognitive dysfunction up to June 2023. Qualitative synthesis was conducted on the final sample (N = 25) using Sandelowski's adaptation of Nobilt and Hare's reciprocal transactional analysis method. Critical appraisal was completed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist.

Results: Through constant comparison of key concepts, findings were organized within 4 interrelated themes that informed a conceptual explanatory model of adapting to living with subjective cognitive dysfunction: (1) symptoms, (2) health care, (3) perceptions of self, and (4) relationships. Participants highlighted how subjective cognitive dysfunction affected interactions in health care settings and involved other symptoms that in turn complicated meaning, self-enhancement, and mastery.

Conclusions: Our model of the process of adapting provides a new way to conceptualize cognitive dysfunction in chronic illness and suggests opportunities for health care professionals to support patients and their families. The results highlight the need for more research to better understand the role of subjective cognitive dysfunction in nondementia-related chronic illnesses.The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021231410).

慢性疾病中的主观认知功能障碍:系统回顾与元综合》。
背景:定性研究对特定人群或特定疾病阶段的主观认知功能障碍体验进行了研究,但尚未对非痴呆相关慢性病患者的主观认知功能障碍体验进行系统的总结和评估:本研究有两个目的:(1)对非痴呆症相关慢性病患者的主观认知功能障碍体验进行系统综述;(2)建立一个解释框架,以描述主观认知功能障碍患者的生活体验:系统检索了四个数据库中截至 2023 年 6 月有关主观认知功能障碍的研究。采用桑德洛夫斯基对诺比尔特和黑尔的互惠交易分析方法的改编,对最终样本(N = 25)进行了定性综合。批判性评估采用批判性评估技能计划核对表完成:通过对关键概念的不断比较,研究结果被归纳为 4 个相互关联的主题,为适应主观认知功能障碍患者的生活提供了一个概念解释模型:(1)症状;(2)医疗保健;(3)自我认知;(4)人际关系。参与者强调了主观认知功能障碍如何影响医疗保健环境中的互动,并涉及到其他症状,而这些症状反过来又使意义、自我提升和掌握复杂化:我们的适应过程模型为慢性病认知功能障碍的概念化提供了一种新方法,并为医护人员提供了支持患者及其家人的机会。研究结果突出表明,有必要开展更多研究,以更好地了解主观认知功能障碍在非老年痴呆症相关慢性病中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信