Cereal-maize vs. legume-maize double-cropping: Impact on crop productivity and nitrogen dynamics under flood-irrigated Mediterranean conditions

IF 4.8 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
María Alonso-Ayuso , Samuel Franco-Luesma, Victoria Lafuente, Ana Bielsa, Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes
{"title":"Cereal-maize vs. legume-maize double-cropping: Impact on crop productivity and nitrogen dynamics under flood-irrigated Mediterranean conditions","authors":"María Alonso-Ayuso ,&nbsp;Samuel Franco-Luesma,&nbsp;Victoria Lafuente,&nbsp;Ana Bielsa,&nbsp;Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Double-cropping is an interesting diversification strategy to increase profitability and sustainability. Besides, by including legumes, it may reduce the N inputs dependency. However, its management with flood irrigation can be challenging. The was the evaluation of the impact of two double-cropping and different nitrogen (N) rates on productivity and N dynamics under flood irrigation. Two double-cropping (barley-maize; pea-maize) and three N rates (unfertilized, 0N; medium: MN; high rate, HN) were evaluated in a field experiment located in NE Spain during two years. In barley-maize, N rates were 0, 125 and 250 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, and 0, 200 and 400 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> for barley and maize phases, respectively. In pea-maize, pea did not receive N, and the MN and HN rates in the maize were reduced (150 and 350 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively).</p><p>Crop productivity and N uptake were evaluated. The economic return and N use efficiency (NUE) were calculated. Soil inorganic N (Nmin) was measured after harvest.</p><p>The pea-maize double-cropping allowed the saving of N fertilizer without yield penalties. Besides, a pre-crop effect of pea in the maize yield was observed. Regarding the cropping system, pea-maize obtained a higher economic return the first year. Besides, the economic return was higher the first year, due to crop penalties. In general, NUE was greater in 0N, and no differences were observed between fertilized treatments. Soil Nmin after pea/barley was higher the first year, coincident with a higher productivity. After maize harvest, the barley-maize led to larger residual Nmin.</p><p>Therefore, in this study, pea-maize allowed a reduction in the N rate, showed greater potential to increase the economic return and reduced the N leaching risk. However, crop yield penalties associated with flood-irrigation, indicate that farmers should be aware of facing a more challenging management or consider other irrigation method to ensure profitability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 101357"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154324003946/pdfft?md5=809bebd5ad1e3dc4e5a1550160b2a1b1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666154324003946-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154324003946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Double-cropping is an interesting diversification strategy to increase profitability and sustainability. Besides, by including legumes, it may reduce the N inputs dependency. However, its management with flood irrigation can be challenging. The was the evaluation of the impact of two double-cropping and different nitrogen (N) rates on productivity and N dynamics under flood irrigation. Two double-cropping (barley-maize; pea-maize) and three N rates (unfertilized, 0N; medium: MN; high rate, HN) were evaluated in a field experiment located in NE Spain during two years. In barley-maize, N rates were 0, 125 and 250 kg N ha−1, and 0, 200 and 400 kg N ha−1 for barley and maize phases, respectively. In pea-maize, pea did not receive N, and the MN and HN rates in the maize were reduced (150 and 350 kg N ha−1, respectively).

Crop productivity and N uptake were evaluated. The economic return and N use efficiency (NUE) were calculated. Soil inorganic N (Nmin) was measured after harvest.

The pea-maize double-cropping allowed the saving of N fertilizer without yield penalties. Besides, a pre-crop effect of pea in the maize yield was observed. Regarding the cropping system, pea-maize obtained a higher economic return the first year. Besides, the economic return was higher the first year, due to crop penalties. In general, NUE was greater in 0N, and no differences were observed between fertilized treatments. Soil Nmin after pea/barley was higher the first year, coincident with a higher productivity. After maize harvest, the barley-maize led to larger residual Nmin.

Therefore, in this study, pea-maize allowed a reduction in the N rate, showed greater potential to increase the economic return and reduced the N leaching risk. However, crop yield penalties associated with flood-irrigation, indicate that farmers should be aware of facing a more challenging management or consider other irrigation method to ensure profitability.

Abstract Image

谷物-玉米与豆科-玉米复种:洪水灌溉的地中海条件下对作物产量和氮动态的影响
双季种植是一种有趣的多样化战略,可提高收益率和可持续性。此外,通过种植豆科植物,可以减少对氮投入的依赖。然而,洪水灌溉对双季作物的管理是一项挑战。本研究评估了在漫灌条件下,两种双季作物和不同的氮肥施用率对生产力和氮动态的影响。在西班牙东北部进行的一项田间试验中,对两种双季作物(大麦-玉米;豌豆-玉米)和三种氮肥施用率(未施肥,0N;中等氮肥施用率:MN;高氮肥施用率:HN)进行了为期两年的评估。在大麦-玉米阶段,氮肥施用量分别为 0、125 和 250 千克/公顷;在大麦和玉米阶段,氮肥施用量分别为 0、200 和 400 千克/公顷。在豌豆-玉米中,豌豆不吸收氮,玉米中的 MN 和 HN 含量减少(分别为每公顷 150 千克氮和 350 千克氮)。对作物产量和氮吸收量进行了评估,并计算了经济收益和氮利用效率(NUE)。收获后对土壤无机氮(Nmin)进行了测量。豌豆-玉米双季种植可以节省氮肥,而不会影响产量。此外,还观察到豌豆对玉米产量的前作效应。在耕作制度方面,豌豆-玉米第一年的经济收益较高。此外,由于作物惩罚,第一年的经济收益更高。一般来说,0N 的氮利用效率更高,施肥处理之间没有差异。豌豆/大麦种植后第一年的土壤氮含量较高,这与较高的生产率相吻合。因此,在这项研究中,豌豆-玉米可以减少氮肥用量,显示出增加经济收益和降低氮沥滤风险的更大潜力。然而,大水漫灌会导致作物减产,这表明农民应意识到面临的管理挑战更大,或考虑采用其他灌溉方法以确保收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信