Analytical Platform to Determine Similarities and Dissimilarities between Cell-Cultured Coffee and Farm-Grown Coffee

IF 2.6 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jaloliddin Khushvakov*, Sebastian E. W. Opitz, Nadja Plüss, Jasmin Sun, Linda Josefine Manthey, Heiko Rischer* and Chahan Yeretzian*, 
{"title":"Analytical Platform to Determine Similarities and Dissimilarities between Cell-Cultured Coffee and Farm-Grown Coffee","authors":"Jaloliddin Khushvakov*,&nbsp;Sebastian E. W. Opitz,&nbsp;Nadja Plüss,&nbsp;Jasmin Sun,&nbsp;Linda Josefine Manthey,&nbsp;Heiko Rischer* and Chahan Yeretzian*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c0023810.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >With global demand for coffee on the rise, coffee cultivation faces multiple challenges, e.g. ensuring supply and reducing their environmental impact. To address these, alternatives to traditional coffee (TC) are proposed such as coffee substitutes and cell-cultured coffees (CC). To assess similarities and differences between traditional and alternative coffees, a three-step analysis is introduced, encompassing precursor analysis in unroasted, aroma in roasted, and sensory in brew. Unroasted CC has higher monosaccharide, lower amino acids and lipids content, and different organic acid profile. Chlorogenic acids, caffeine and trigonelline, were low to absent. Roasted CC revealed lower aroma compound intensity in S- and N-containing compounds, Strecker aldehydes and guaiacols. Nevertheless, furfurals, higher homologous aldehydes, and hydrocarbons were abundant. This provides a protocol for mapping out the performance of alternatives to TC and guiding their optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":72048,"journal":{"name":"ACS food science & technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00238","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS food science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With global demand for coffee on the rise, coffee cultivation faces multiple challenges, e.g. ensuring supply and reducing their environmental impact. To address these, alternatives to traditional coffee (TC) are proposed such as coffee substitutes and cell-cultured coffees (CC). To assess similarities and differences between traditional and alternative coffees, a three-step analysis is introduced, encompassing precursor analysis in unroasted, aroma in roasted, and sensory in brew. Unroasted CC has higher monosaccharide, lower amino acids and lipids content, and different organic acid profile. Chlorogenic acids, caffeine and trigonelline, were low to absent. Roasted CC revealed lower aroma compound intensity in S- and N-containing compounds, Strecker aldehydes and guaiacols. Nevertheless, furfurals, higher homologous aldehydes, and hydrocarbons were abundant. This provides a protocol for mapping out the performance of alternatives to TC and guiding their optimization.

Abstract Image

确定细胞培养咖啡与农场种植咖啡异同的分析平台
随着全球对咖啡需求的不断增长,咖啡种植面临着多重挑战,如确保供应和减少对环境的影响。为此,人们提出了传统咖啡(TC)的替代品,如咖啡替代品和细胞培养咖啡(CC)。为评估传统咖啡和替代咖啡的异同,引入了三步分析法,包括未烘焙咖啡的前体分析、烘焙咖啡的香气分析和冲泡咖啡的感官分析。未烘焙 CC 的单糖含量较高,氨基酸和脂类含量较低,有机酸含量也不同。绿原酸、咖啡因和三尖杉酯碱含量较低甚至没有。烘焙 CC 的含 S 和 N 化合物、Strecker 醛和愈创木酚的香气强度较低。不过,呋喃类、高同源醛类和碳氢化合物含量丰富。这为绘制三氯乙烷替代品的性能图和指导其优化提供了一个方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信